@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:Wrongidy wrong.
Ive advocated against several aspects of assault weapons.
http://able2know.org/topic/203766-54#post-5201295
http://able2know.org/topic/206143-5#post-5231166
http://able2know.org/topic/203766-20#post-5197620
farmerman wrote:ONCE more, Im against the capacity and the construction of the gun to receive , say, a banana clip.
If a gun can accept a detachable magazine
at all, it is possible to make a banana clip that will fit that gun.
farmerman wrote:State hunting laws govern the top number of shells that can be within the breech or slide. In Pa and NY and most of the hunting world, Its under 5 without reloading.
That's why people who hunt that sort of game with assault rifles use five round magazines.
farmerman wrote:These few construction as[pect coupled with better background checks . Canada still hs 28 days with a much better cross check than we have. Pa has one of the better gun checks and background checks and still much gets overlooked.
I've never heard anyone explain why a background check needs to take longer than an hour.
farmerman wrote:useless short barrels just to keep a long gun concealed also gotta go.
As I recall, they have fallen under NFA restrictions since 1934.
I share your view that short rifle barrels are bad (if it's a rifle, we want velocity), but do note that the police and military tend to be equipped with 14 inch barrels on their rifles. They apparently don't seem to think that short barrels are useless.
farmerman wrote:Im sure they can put their brains to work to come up with wifi enabled"secure" guns or better security locks and safeties.
That's OK as an option maybe. But no mandate for such guns will be allowed unless they are also mandated for all law enforcement.
I wonder if Tarnhelm is still in business.