so you are an arbiter? wow, I think you are waaay too full of yourself dude. This is opinion and evidence. Your evidence is all opinion. Just because you cite a concept doesnt mean youve convincingly stated where its been so used wrt your initial "Opinion"
The Supreme Court always
uses either Rational Basis Review, Intermediate Scrutiny, or Strict Scrutiny when they determine whether or not to strike down a law that impacts a fundamental right.
The fact that the odds of them using one of those three principles is literally 100%
is a pretty strong indicator that one of the three will be applied to the question of an assault weapons ban.
And that there is no real reason to ban pistol grips is a pretty clear fact too.
I mean, can you come up with any plausible reason whatsoever why pistol grips should be banned from rifles?
Anyway, I have no idea why you are so set on banning pistol grips, but you were instrumental in derailing magazine limits.
If it wasn't for all this strenuous insistence on banning pistol grips, we would be facing a hard push right now for a stand-alone limit on magazine sizes.
Your assistance to the cause may have been inadvertent and even unwilling, but you were absolutely perfect.
Back from the Hobbit, BTW. Safe and sound and no massacres.