0
   

At least 20+ dead students in Virginia Tech; shooter dead

 
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:33 pm
aidan wrote:
Quote:
England has made its people powerless by banning guns.

On the contrary, England has made its most vulnerable people feel safer by banning guns.


I'd say both statements are true.

Shame on England!
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:36 pm
dlowan wrote:
It's only the gun nuts who seek to conflate the two.


No it isn't. And please refrain from bigoted language.
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:36 pm
Gun control or not, there are enough guns on the black market, where if someone really wants one(in the US, England, or anywhere in the world), they can get one. Someone sick enough to shoot & kill 30 people is going to find a way to do it regardless....people can make bombs too, you know.

Either way, this incident is nuts. I can't imagine being a student on the campus who even had to live through it.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:37 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
cerealkiller, are you reading squinny's last post? Far more people
are killed through guns.


Balderdash!

Gun accidents only kill a few thousand per year.

I haven't looked up recent car accident stats (and don't intend to), but last I saw car accidents killed some 40,000 per year.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:38 pm
Slappy Doo Hoo wrote:
Gun control or not, there are enough guns on the black market, where if someone really wants one(in the US, England, or anywhere in the world), they can get one. Someone sick enough to shoot & kill 30 people is going to find a way to do it regardless....people can make bombs too, you know.

Either way, this incident is nuts. I can't imagine being a student on the campus who even had to live through it.


Well said!
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:40 pm
Quote:
This is the reason that most of the time I only vote for candidates supported by the NRA.


Unbelievable, you're really serious? What if in every other way that person was completely unqualified, would you still vote for him/her if that person was only the person supported by the NRA?
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:41 pm
Nevermind, revel.
I started responding to that drivel, but it's not worth the time or the effort.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:41 pm
aidan wrote:
I hate to say it- but I think the violence is due to more than the availability of guns (although I think banning them would be a start).


Destroying American freedom would be more of a finish -- for America.



aidan wrote:
I know fear and protectiveness and defensiveness were ingrained in me as a woman in America. I didn't know how much a part of me it was, until I moved somewhere and realized I didn't need to be afraid anymore. But I know once I go back, it'll come right back. What a sad statement to make about one's own home country.


Don't think you really have to be afraid here either.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:46 pm
revel wrote:
Quote:
This is the reason that most of the time I only vote for candidates supported by the NRA.


Unbelievable, you're really serious? What if in every other way that person was completely unqualified, would you still vote for him/her if that person was only the person supported by the NRA?


It would depend on the situation. It is possible I'd not vote in that race.

For instance, in a 3 way race between Obama, Giuliani, and Hitler, Hitler would clearly be the least of the three evils. But I'd never vote for any of them.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:48 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
Nevermind, revel.
I started responding to that drivel, but it's not worth the time or the effort.


Well, if you equate "defense of freedom" to "drivel" then maybe it is best that you keep it to yourself.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:49 pm
oralloy wrote:
aidan wrote:
I hate to say it- but I think the violence is due to more than the availability of guns (although I think banning them would be a start).


Destroying American freedom would be more of a finish -- for America.



aidan wrote:
I know fear and protectiveness and defensiveness were ingrained in me as a woman in America. I didn't know how much a part of me it was, until I moved somewhere and realized I didn't need to be afraid anymore. But I know once I go back, it'll come right back. What a sad statement to make about one's own home country.


Don't think you really have to be afraid here either.


She would if some here who are advocating having people with gun permits carry guns on government property so if some crazy guy/girl start shootin, a bunch of crazy guys/girls can start shootin back.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:50 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
You're way of thinking is wrong. Had we gun control, the shooter, a Bosnian immigrant, would not have been able to have a gun in the first place - thus no shoot-out, no lives would have been lost.


Balderdash!
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:50 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
cerealkiller, there is no justification to carry a gun around with you, period.


Americans don't need to have justification.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:53 pm
revel wrote:
oralloy wrote:
aidan wrote:
I know fear and protectiveness and defensiveness were ingrained in me as a woman in America. I didn't know how much a part of me it was, until I moved somewhere and realized I didn't need to be afraid anymore. But I know once I go back, it'll come right back. What a sad statement to make about one's own home country.


Don't think you really have to be afraid here either.


She would if some here who are advocating having people with gun permits carry guns on government property so if some crazy guy/girl start shootin, a bunch of crazy guys/girls can start shootin back.


The people who are shooting back would be unlikely to be crazy.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 06:58 pm
oralloy wrote:
CalamityJane wrote:
cerealkiller, there is no justification to carry a gun around with you, period.


Americans don't need to have justification.



and yet they wonder why most of the world considers them arrogant bastards
0 Replies
 
Heatwave
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 07:01 pm
sozobe wrote:
As far as I can tell, the gunman did the first shooting, then there was a lockdown; then it was temporarily lifted and he turned up someplace else and did the second shooting.

Not clear on that yet either, though.

I'm glad your cousin is fine, _Heatwave_.


We are too, Sozobe. He's okay b/c he had afternoon classes today, else he'd have been there.

I just saw this 'raw video' on yahoo videos. Apparently someone captured just the sound (of gunfire & people shouting) on a cell phone camera. I wish hadn't. It's made me sick to the stomach. It sounded like 50 gunshots, some voices yelling, and the one voice I could hear clearly, someone yelling 'get out of the way.' I wish I hadn't watched this. I can't even begin to imagine what it must've been like to be on the scene.


I want to know from all these people proposing 'gun freedom' here if they have sons/daughters/brothers/sisters going to school these days. Do they pause and put themselves in these poor kids' and their families' shoes, at all?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 07:08 pm
djjd62 wrote:
oralloy wrote:
CalamityJane wrote:
cerealkiller, there is no justification to carry a gun around with you, period.


Americans don't need to have justification.



and yet they wonder why most of the world considers them arrogant bastards


Not really. I doubt many of us care whether or why someone else considers us arrogant.

We are free. We can have guns simply because we choose to, without having to justify our decision to anyone. Period.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 07:12 pm
Good evening on a sad day in Blacksburg. I am hearing some rumors tonight, from students and others I know. The theory is that these may be two unconnected acts. In the last press conference I heard, rhe police chief had a "person of interest" that they are talking to regarding the 7:15 am incident.. He may have been involved with the police prior to the Norris Hall thing. I am reporting rumors, so don't quote me.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 07:18 pm
_Heatwave_ wrote:
Do they pause and put themselves in these poor kids' and their families' shoes, at all?


Personally if I were in the shoes of someone facing a deranged gunman I'd want the biggest gun possible in my own hands.

I feel bad for the victims (and also for the gunman -- something has to have hurt him badly for him to have done such a thing). But I also realize that our freedom to have guns is not the cause of the incident.

(And even if it really were the cause, the freedom would be worth the price.)
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Apr, 2007 07:22 pm
Your on-the-spot reportage is appreciated, RJB.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 07:46:17