Setanta wrote:Yeah right . . . find a depressive sociopath, and give him a book, and count the corpses which result. Then give him a gun, and repeat the exercise . . .
First of all, you can't count the violence which can result from speech or books, because it usually doesn't happen immediately or in a way in which cause and effect are clear, but ideas can certainly cause violence. That doesn't however, means that the free expression of ideas should be banned.
My point, though, was that all freedoms are messy and expensive. For example, if a widely unpopular group demonstrates, a lot of money may be spent on having police around to keep order. In fact, the idea that books and the ideas they bear lead to strife is exactly the reason given in Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451" for making books illegal. The reason why that argument is false, is that freedom is worth the mess it causes.
England has made its people powerless by banning guns. That's one solution, but I don't think it's the right one.
Also, I think it's in rather poor taste to use this terrible thing as yet another excuse for bashing America.