6
   

Why Does A Manipulative Lying over 45 yr old Man Waste Almost 4 yrs, With A Decent Woman

 
 
izzythepush
 
  4  
Sun 23 Nov, 2014 03:42 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
I had seen a large number files who labels claimed to contain child porn being offer on p2p networks


And you never reported any of it. So much for the moral dilemma.
BillRM
 
  0  
Sun 23 Nov, 2014 03:48 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
And you never reported any of it. So much for the moral dilemma.


Why would there be a need to report as anyone who have p2p software can go on such networks and see the files being offer including the police.

In fact that is one of the main ways police track down people with child porn so they are more then aware of what is being offer.

To sum up the police are already fully aware of what files that are being offer over p2p networks. There is nothing private or hidden on those networks.

With officers assign full time to monitor such networks.
0 Replies
 
FOUND SOUL
 
  2  
Sun 23 Nov, 2014 04:17 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
System administrators tend to discourage the use of P2P applications. In addition to tying up bandwidth and possibly exposing the administrator's organization legally, P2P applications can be used to bypass firewalls and distribute malware. Networks are often set up to prevent peer-to-peer "side talk" by PCs.


Quote:
In its simplest form, a peer-to-peer (P2P) network is created when two or more PCs are connected and share resources without going through a separate server computer. A P2P network can be an ad hoc connection—a couple of computers connected via a Universal Serial Bus to transfer files. A P2P network also can be a permanent infrastructure that links a half-dozen computers in a small office over copper wires. Or a P2P network can be a network on a much grander scale in which special protocols and applications set up direct relationships among users over the Internet
.

So who are you networking with and how many computers at home do you in addition connect to each other Smile

See if you google p2p networks "no child pornography comes up" ...

I guess the people you share your stuff with are the ones sharing back the "large number of files labelled child pornography"... But you don't open those..

BillRM
 
  -1  
Sun 23 Nov, 2014 04:44 pm
@FOUND SOUL,
Oh a little knowledge is a danger thing as major p2p networks are open to anyone that care to joint that network and the major ones have tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands plus located all over the earth at anyone time.

The one I normally used is ARES

http://aresgalaxy.sourceforge.net/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares_Galaxy#The_Ares_Network
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Sun 23 Nov, 2014 04:49 pm
@FOUND SOUL,
Here is a link that talk about p2p networks and child porn and the means that law enforcement used to try to track people using such networks for child porn.


http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/Wolak_Liberatore_Levine_2013.pdf
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Sun 23 Nov, 2014 05:36 pm
@BillRM,
These other users could be located anywhere in the world. The software allowsusers to log onto the P2P network and issue requests for and download files from other network users, called peers. Userscreate shared folders that are accessible to others in the network and use these folders to receive downloaded files and alsoto share files they possess. Procedures vary somewhat among networks, but in most, users search for electronic files by usingkeywords, which are broadcast to the network of participating peers. Certain keywords are specifically associated with CP,but network users do not have to know these to obtain CP. Users can locate and acquire files by employing search termsthat, for example, describe sex acts and children’s ages, which are often contained in CP file titles and tags

The Law Enforcement Response

Quote:
The ways that P2P networks facilitate online CP trafficking have created a number of challenges for law enforcement andpolicy makers seeking effective ways to combat the proliferation of CP. These challenges include how to develop responses toCP trafficking on P2P networks, target the most egregious offenders, understand and measure the impact of policing effortsand, ultimately, reduce CP trafficking and the number of illegal images and videos of children that are circulating online.


Thanks. I guess anyone viewing child pornography is going to google that stuff, so they can ascertain what how they may get caught by the Law Inforcement. Can't see why anyone else would want to read all of that can you?
BillRM
 
  -1  
Sun 23 Nov, 2014 05:54 pm
@FOUND SOUL,
Quote:
Thanks. I guess anyone viewing child pornography is going to google that stuff, so they can ascertain what how they may get caught by the Law Inforcement. Can't see why anyone else would want to read all of that can you?


Still trying to sell the idea that the only persons who might be interested in such information/knowledge are the CP traders?

Only people with misinformation such as Izzy and yourself can show that you are not CP traders and the only means to be "pure" is not to have such knowledge?

Well thanks to me you are far less "pure" then you was a few hours ago so I guess you are likely to be a future CP trader.

Come to think of it by your logic Janis Wolaka,∗, Marc Liberatore b, Brian Neil Levine the authors of the paper must be CP traders as why would they care to do such research otherwise and anyone who read their paper for that matter.

There should be a SWAT team knocking down their front doors down right now.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 02:05 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
Still trying to sell the idea that the only persons who might be interested in such information/knowledge are the CP traders?


Still trying to sell the idea you're not interested in that sort of material? I don't think many people believe you.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 03:24 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Still trying to sell the idea you're not interested in that sort of material?


Sorry but the only females who turn me on sexually are ones with large chests at least a C cup or better not little girls and surely not little boys. Perhaps you can not understand that fact as little boys secretly turn you on, at least I would not be surprise if that turn out to be the true in your case.

Now I am interest in the subject of the internet and that include illegal actives on the net as well as legal uses of the net along with the details of the net underpinning design such as low level protocols.

Unlike you where the net might as well be magical and what little you think you know about the net happen not to be true.

I find it amazing how some people can even be proud of their lack of knowledge of the tools that made modern lives function such as the internet.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 03:48 am
@BillRM,
You're the one with a track record in coming across child pornography, and you're the one who was asked to leave a park with your box of kittens.

You can make up **** about me if you want, but what you've told us about yourself is damning enough.

And because you're so very very stupid, you don't know when to keep your mouth shut, and prattle on confirming everything I've said about you.

Interesting that you see abusing little boys as being worse than little girls. That's the sort of distinction only a bigot would make. Abusing children is wrong, regardless of the gender, there's no difference whether it's boys or girls. The fact you think there's a distinction says a lot about you. You don't have a problem with paedophilia, just homosexuality.

I got a pm this morning thanking me for keeping the pressure on you, and allowing other posters to see what sort of creature you are. Truth is, I couldn't have done it without you. You're so very predictable.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 04:24 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
You're the one with a track record in coming across child pornography,


I do have such a track record that is news to me

Quote:
you're the one who was asked to leave a park with your box of kittens.


Yes there is no question that all male cats lovers who would move heaven and earth to find homes for kittens are also pedophiles.

Quote:
Interesting that you see abusing little boys as being worse than little girls. That's the sort of distinction only a bigot would make. Abusing children is wrong, regardless of the gender, there's no difference whether it's boys or girls. The fact you think there's a distinction says a lot about you. You don't have a problem with paedophilia, just homosexuality.


That a long long reach from my statement that neither little girls or little boys turn me on and that males of any ages does not do so for me let alone little boys who will not in the future have any likelihood of growing up to be objects of sexual desire to me.

You did needed to warp my comments into the fifth dimension to come up with the above nonsense that I think that sexual abused of a male child is worst then a female child.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 04:26 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
You're the one with a track record in coming across child pornography,


I do have such a track record that is news to me


You've just devoted a few posts on this very thread to it. Your short term memory really is fucked.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 04:43 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
you've just devoted a few posts on this very thread to it. Your short term memory really is fucked.


Sorry my comments was that in all the thousands of adult porn files I had downloaded over the years from p2p networks and such there was only two to three cases where I have some question/concern if the female actresses was of legal age or not and those I wiped from my hard drive to be on the safe side.

Not that I commonly run into child porn materials and I in fact have never seen videos with clearly prepubescent children in them, in my life.

So how you came up with the claimed that I had stated that I am always running into such material is beyond me.

I have a suggestion why do you not try to attack me base on my statements instead of sick nonsense you are always coming up with.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 04:51 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
I had seen a large number files who labels claimed to contain child porn being offer on p2p networks


Your memory really is shot.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 05:17 am
@izzythepush,
Running into mean seeing to me or downloading to me not seeing a list of files who title claims or imply that they contain child porn and anyone repeat anyone searching for adult porn using p2p networks will indeed see such files listed in their search box results among the others results of their search.

There is nothing either illegal or immoral in doing a search for adult porn and having such materials also being listed as it just how p2p search engines work and you just do not download them.

You define running into in a manner that once more is strange to most people way of thinking.

As I said I have never ran into using the normal meaning of that term ran into any files that was clearly child porn and have no idea if in fact those listed files that claim they have child porn did or did not contain child porn.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 09:55 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
You define running into in a manner that once more is strange to most people way of thinking.


I think my definition is fairly mainstream, and you have no understanding of what most people would find strange. If you, did you wouldn't think that boasting about your knowledge of extreme pornography, that is unavailable on Google, would impress people.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 10:35 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
extreme pornography, that is unavailable on Google, would impress people.


ON Google once again what the hell are you talking about??????

It would be nice if you have some little tiny bit of understanding of the internet as there is no extreme porn that I know about on google!!!!!!!!!

Hell I am surprise with the degree of understanding you had shown here that you know how to turn your computer on.
izzythepush
 
  4  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 02:57 pm
@BillRM,
Not only do you not speak basic English, you don't understand it either. What part of "extreme pornography, that is unavailable on Google" do you think means "extreme pornography, that is available on Google?"

Were you sick they day they covered prefixes?
Germlat
 
  1  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 03:20 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Not only do you not speak basic English, you don't understand it either. What part of "extreme pornography, that is unavailable on Google" do you think means "extreme pornography, that is available on Google?"

Were you sick they day they covered prefixes?

I call what some call "child pornography" sites, child exploitation, or child abuse material ...never had it pop-up yet...not sure where you'd have to go to find this stuff. I bet the pedophiles know.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Mon 24 Nov, 2014 04:06 pm
@izzythepush,
There is no repeat no extreme pornography available on Google at least that I know of!!!!!!!

Google search engines do not link to such material.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 11:57:56