Israel's Amazing Medical Breakthrough

Presently, most people in the USA want to reduce or eliminate money going to Egypt. This is due to its ruling Muslim Brotherhood.

As said, you don't have an idea about Art. 176/177 (Liberazione condizionale) of the Codice penale.
For life sentences it's 26 years, btw.

There's nothing said about returning at night - that would be "open prison", but still 'prison'.

Presently, most people in the USA want to reduce or eliminate money going to Egypt.

Quote:

Presently, most people in the USA want to reduce or eliminate money going to Egypt.

Such sanctimonious assholes!

If we can't have our choice of brutal dictators, you can kiss the money bye bye.

Look at it like a consumer. Don't throw good money after bad.

As always, I think you are mistaken regarding most of the crimes you believe we have committed.

A second candidate for most extreme act of Mideast international terrorism in the peak year of 1985 is a car-bombing in Beirut on March 8 that killed 80 people and wounded 256. The bomb was placed outside a Mosque, timed to explode when worshippers left. "About 250 girls and women in flowing black chadors, pouring out of Friday prayers at the Imam Rida Mosque, took the brunt of the blast," Nora Boustany reported. The bomb also "burned babies in their beds," killed children "as they walked home from the mosque," and "devastated the main street of the densely populated" West Beirut suburb. The target was a Shi'ite leader accused of complicity in terrorism, but he escaped. The crime was organized by the CIA and its Saudi clients with the assistance of British intelligence. NOTE{Boustany, _Washington Post Weekly_, March 14, 1988; Bob Woodward, _Veil_ (Simon & Schuster, 1987, 396f.).}

As always, I think you are mistaken regarding most of the crimes you believe we have committed.

...

The secret to understanding US foreign policy is that there is no secret. Principally, one must come to the realization that the United States strives to dominate the world. Once one understands that, much of the apparent confusion, contradiction, and ambiguity surrounding Washington’s policies fades away. To express this striving for dominance numerically, one can consider that since the end of World War Two the United States has:

Endeavored to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments, most of which were democratically-elected.
Grossly interfered in democratic elections in at least 30 countries.
Waged war/military action, either directly or in conjunction with a proxy army, in some 30 countries.
Attempted to assassinate more than 50 foreign leaders.
Dropped bombs on the people of some 30 countries.
Suppressed dozens of populist/nationalist movements in every corner of the world.[2]

The United States institutional war machine has long been, and remains, on automatic pilot.

See,

http://able2know.org/topic/212447-1

There seem to be no end to US' support for dictators with closed eyes to the native population.

One of the US greatest crimes, after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,

Actually, that end came decades ago, when the Cold War ended.

Closed eyes? Nonsense (even before the end of the Cold War).

Feigning ignorance becomes you, OralBoy.

He replied that he saw no military justification for the dropping of the bomb.

Why the barbaric cruelty which was so very unnecessary?!?!?

All one has to do is look at the interaction of the US with any country and barbaric cruelty will leap to the fore.

In particular, saying Hiroshima & Nagasaki happened at "the height" of a war, after Germany was defeated and occupied

and after the surrounded and exhausted Japanese had made attempts to bring about an end to the war without loss of face,

and in total ignorance of the views of:

Eisenhower: " I voiced to him [Stimson] my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face'."

Leahy: "It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons."

Herbert Hoover: ""...the Japanese were prepared to negotiate all the way from February 1945...up to and before the time the atomic bombs were dropped; ...if such leads had been followed up, there would have been no occasion to drop the bombs."

MacArthur: "MacArthur's views about the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were starkly different from what the general public supposed." He continues, "When I asked General MacArthur about the decision to drop the bomb, I was surprised to learn he had not even been consulted. What, I asked, would his advice have been? He replied that he saw no military justification for the dropping of the bomb. The war might have ended weeks earlier, he said, if the United States had agreed, as it later did anyway, to the retention of the institution of the emperor." (Norman Cousins, The Pathology of Power, pp 65, 70-71.)

I have often heard it speculated the motive for dropping the Atomic bomb was to see just how powerful this weapon was and to show other countries....to make them fear the US!

Even though this occurred before I was born, I still have grievances against the US.

OK, the US dropped one bomb on Hiroshima but why Nagasaki?!

Why the barbaric cruelty which was so very unnecessary?!?!?

Stimson just called him an idiot and never bothered to tell anyone else what Ike said.