I've just read your post about getting back together, Freedom, and I have conflicting emotions about it.
On the one hand I am happy for you but on the other I can't help feeling that when you were describing what you were going through - the chest pains; your son offering to indict husband and Brenda on murder charges and all - it was only natural that we would begin to turn against your husband.
I don't apologise for what I said about wishing he would be more ******* sensitive because at the time it seemed like he was causing you unnecessary pain and I'm sure that's how everybody else felt too but at the same time I have been through this phase and I know that it is a compulsion, something that overrides your normal sensibilities.
It just seems to me that Nature is mad sometimes. Things that are built into the brain that must supposedly have been put there to protect us [evolution wise] actually end up doing us nothing but harm [I'm thinking of cases of truama where the brain shuts down, emotionally, in order to protect us from something that is too painful to cope with but how this actually leaves us outside of acceptable human coordination. Sorry if this seems like I'm getting off topic but I'm trying to say that the way we are designed is less than perfect and that this isn't just limited to a mid-life crisis].
Regarding Smorgs comments about involving family I would say from my personel experience that it doesn't take much at all for the whole "tribe" to turn against a blood "outsider". That's what families do. I'm sorry if this seems hard hearted but I don't actually care what they think of me. I don't value their respect because I know it can be snuffed out with just a word from my partner and what sort of respect is that anyway?
She has told them things in the past that have been as nothing compared to this but I was treated as a pariah by them so it would not be anything new.
It's my opinion that families are quite often selfish and that most of them would prefer her to be single because she is more often at their convenience or beck and call that way. My partner is a "giver" who finds it hard to turn away from anybody's calls on her emotional and practical attention. That's her "role" within the family set up and so she's the one who it is most adventatious for them to have living without a time-consuming relationship! I feel sure that they would take malicious pleasure in scorning my side of the story even if I were niave enough to try and explain it to them.
However, I may be prejudiced because "family" never gave me anything but problems and grief for as long as I can remember [excepting my late Gran, who bought me up], so personally, naturally I do not value these ties as much as somebody like Smorgs would.
I do value my own children immensely and hope to change the "family" tide with them and to always be supportive and on their side as they mature but even having said that if they were to try and influence what I do as regards my personel relationships and happiness I would make it quite clear to them that this is none of their business and I know better than anybody else what is best for me. I would expect them to respect that and I will endeavour to give them the same respect as regards personal relationships.
Sorry if I have ranted on abit here but this is something I feel strongly about!