Re: Slappy: I'm up for your challenge!
Welcome to A2K, Kyrian. We're gettin' serious here! Great ;-)
Kyrian wrote:Your words: It (porn) doesn't mean he's cheating on you
On the contrary: if one defines adultery or cheating as being activity that one engages in outside of a committed relationship in order to procure emotional and/or sexual satisfaction, I submit to you that viewing porn passes the litmus test easily.
But that is
one scary-ass definition of adultery or cheating you got there! Every thing "one engages in outside of a committed relationship in order to procure emotional and/or sexual satisfaction" is cheating?
This is pretty much the logic that brought me into this (otherwise rather unattractive) discussion in the first place - I find it eerie, up to the point of veering into the controlling/abusive. Your partner is not to receive any "emotional satisfaction" away from you? What are you of each other, each other's property rather than two individuals who resolved to be with each other?
(NOTE: I am neither angry nor being deliberately insultive, or anything ... I just sound like that because I've resolved not to edit my posts into cautious inanity anymore ;-))
I am very happy indeed to have always found a degree of emotional satisfaction outside any relationship I had, in various healthy ways. A heart-to-heart talk with a good friend. A hug from a close colleague, when I felt upset about a project gone wrong. The chance to honestly talk about something that bothered me in my relationship with a friend who might give some sensible input from outside - or hell, could provide a little comfort if I'd had a fight or something.
Is any of that cheating? If you think so, my objections along the controlling-up-to-abusive line apply, IMHO. If you don't think so, fine - so, it means you need a different definition of cheating.
Then there is another part of the definition, the what "one engages in outside of a committed relationship" part. OK, so if you find sexual satisfaction with someone outside your marriage, you're cheating, I'll go with that, sure. (Though even there it's not like that's a magic formula that instantly takes away all dilemma's on where the border lies. If you go dancing (whether in a disco or on your local community ballroom dancing course), and the dancing heats you up a little inside and it's part of what has you extra fired up when you then make love with your man at night - have you cheated?).
The thing we're talking about here, though, is not finding sexual satisfaction with
someone else - there is noone
there, no real-life contact with anyone (unlike, for example, in some erotic online chat). It's finding sexual satisfaction
in your head. Whether you just close your eyes and fantasize about something, someone, and get off on that, or whether you look at the picture of a girl in a sexy ad and do the same, the sexual activity you're engaging in is one by yourself, of yourself, fired by your own imagination and fantasy.
So the near-philosophical question we arrive at here is whether what takes place in one's
head can be said to be in the realm of what's "outside the relationship", and thus - cheating. Personally, I very strongly feel that "die Gedanke sind Frei", or whatever that old song has it - your mind is yours and yours alone, and it is noone else's possession. Noone is to tell you what to
think (or think about), not your husband or wive either. The notion that fidelity entails mind control is to me straight out scary.
Think I'm overreacting? Then consider my earlier (rhetorical) question to Montana. Do you ever masturbate? Do you ever think about someone-not-your-husband while doing so - Keanu Reeves, say, or the guy featured in that novel you were reading, or a random handsome man you saw walking past that day, or simply some fictitious guy who exists nowhere but in your fantasy? If so, what's the difference between that and a guy looking at a girl in a picture before going off (and getting off) in the realm of fantasy? Does one's vow of marriage extend to never ever thinking about anyone else while fantasising? If not, isn't there a double standard here that sets porn apart from any other form of sexual fantasy?
Kyrian wrote:The tone of your post indicates that you believe that viewing porn is a harmless activity. I respectfully submit that it may seem harmless for the male, but it's obvious that women and children are suffering as a result of it.
We've been talking about, like, Playboy here (I dont like it, but hey, thats the standard). How do children "suffer" as a result of Playboy? Are you equating something like Playboy with, say, kiddieporn? Wouldn't there be an essential difference in terms of consent, there?
Kyrian wrote:You express your exasperation (along with others here) over the number of threads related to porn. Time to look at the obvious. If you really feel that the number of threads are too numerous, aren't you really just shooting the messenger? Seeing this many posts must make it crystal clearn that porn must be a problem, else why so many posts concerning women about its impact?
For one, as was pointed out here, there are so many threads along those lines here because apparently, A2K is one of the main sites that comes up in a Google search about it. So pretty much anyone who
does have a problem with this, ends up here. Seen in such proportions, the 10 threads or so about it don't exactly necessarily prove a problem of national proportions ... ;-)
Kyrian wrote:Unless, of course, you choose to believe that insecurity is the culprit. [..] Your argument, at least to me, echos his same sentiment. Men don't want to blame their weakness. They'd rather blame the people who are hurt by it.
How do you view the many women who peruse such stuff, as evidenced for example in this thread?
(Sorry to hear about your husband, by the way. That must have been awful.)
Kyrian wrote:Marriage or committed relationships are most successful when both parties acknowledge that one is an extension of the other and that both have needs, insecurities, or fears that have to be maturely discussed and dealt with....
Therein lies the problem, I believe. Both have needs and insecurities. In the cases described in these porn threads here, those needs and insecurities are conflicting. The one needs to sometimes just be able to dream away a bit into an (erotic) dimension that, for one moment, does
not include wife, kids, work or household. And the other gets mighty insecure/hurt/suspicious if he does that, and needs him to stop. How does the need in marriage to "acknowledge that one is an extension of the other" equates necessarily with the conclusion that he'll just have to give up his emotional need to satisfy hers?
Heh - who woulda thought - an actual serious discussion on this thread ... ;-)