Please stop with the porn

tinygiraffe wrote:

spidergal, if you don't want a guy that looks at porn (immediately or eventually,) good luck to you. but you can insist on limiting your search to any group of people- whether redheads, libertarians, or conjoined twins. (pity if one doesn't look at porn and the other does...)

i just take issue with your implication (i could have sworn you came right out and said it) that the morality around porn is absolute... you're jumping ahead talking about "justifying" it- before it would need justification, you'd have to be sure it's wrong. and for that matter, i don't know where you get the idea that polygamy needs justification. you're assuming there is an objective "right and wrong" to draw from. you may be up to date on neurology, but where does it say we have objective access to anything, let alone morality- assuming (another big if) that such a thing even exists?

Just to clarify here. The universal morality thing was said in response to something you said. I never meant to associate universal morality with watching porn. I think I never really got what you had said, and now I feel I shouldn't have brought that in. It seems to have created misunderstanding here.

Hello guys? I never associated porn with universal morality. They are two very different things.

0 Replies

you spider girls, always trying to impose your "universal morality" on my asian anal porn.

stop it.

0 Replies

I am not trying to impose anything on anyone. Go ahead with the porn, OGIONIK.

I am mainly concerned with how it affects the brain, and whether that's good or bad. I have never said outright that it's bad. Who knows.

0 Replies

spidergal wrote:

I am mainly concerned with how it affects the brain..

I would say that it affects the brain of those who make idle, moral judgements about it.

Otherwise, depending on the countries, it affects the sight or the hearing..

0 Replies

Francis wrote:

spidergal wrote:
I am mainly concerned with how it affects the brain..

I would say that it affects the brain of those who make idle, moral judgements about it.

Otherwise, depending on the countries, it affects the sight or the hearing..

Taken along with a good Chilean wine. preferably a cabernet sauvignon, it also effects blood pressure.

0 Replies

Francis wrote:

spidergal wrote:
I am mainly concerned with how it affects the brain..

I would say that it affects the brain of those who make idle, moral judgements about it.

Otherwise, depending on the countries, it affects the sight or the hearing..

You are making an ideal judgement here.

0 Replies

I, sometimes, do ideal judgements. Obviously. They are mine...

But often I do irony, too.

0 Replies

Quote:

Some guys are morally so upright that they would never look at porn, no matter how strong an urge they experience at times.

That's an indicator of strong character.

Good guys will always exert self-control.

Same goes for ogling and other related things.

In the end, it is, I think, a matter of choice.

this is what i originally responded to, spidergirl. if you're clarifying now, we've been back-and-forth about it for a week or so? but this is how the issue of "universal morality" came up, whatever you were (or weren't) implying before. perhaps i just didn't take the part about "matter of choice" seriously enough, or i assumed you didn't.

0 Replies

This is a reply to the very first post of this discussion:

Would my man still look at other women even if I have the perfect hourglass shape? (the perfect feminine body) (36-24-36)

0 Replies

Well . . . maybe not if you poke his eyes out . . .

0 Replies

Is it normal for a woman to hate the other women her husband looks at?

0 Replies

Not being a woman, i don't think i'm qualified to answer that question. However, i would note that this is an observation i have made. It is an act of transference, though. The woman your husband looks at is not responsible for a willful act of attempting to deprive you of the man whom you wish to control. If there is a problem there (and i don't know that there is), it is your husband who is responsible.

Men are visually stimulated. It is completely unreasonable not to recognize that men are going to look at other women. This doesn't mean that they want to get them into bed. If, however, in any particular case, it does mean that, then the woman who chose such an unreliable man is as much or more responsible than he is.

0 Replies

I can blame the women who wear revealing clothes in public. (Even at church!) They distract attention of all men in public.

0 Replies

Mariceloverthere wrote:

I can blame the women who wear revealing clothes in public. (Even at church!) They distract attention of all men in public.

You would be a bad person to do so.

It is the fault of the meat that a hungry man covets.

0 Replies

Mariceloverthere wrote:

I can blame the women who wear revealing clothes in public. (Even at church!) They distract attention of all men in public.

If women walked around naked, it would not alter the undeniable fact that if your man loves you, that he looks at other women is not to be construed as evidence that he does not love you. Alternatively, if he was always bullshitting, and never loved you, you could make all the women in the world walk around in sacks from head to toe, and he's still gonna go out lookin' for some strange . . .

0 Replies

Mariceloverthere wrote:

Is it normal for a woman to hate the other women her husband looks at?

No, I don't think it's normal to hate someone because their husband looks at them. Marriage does not come with a pair of blinders.

0 Replies

Please stop with the porn

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know