It is not my evidence that needs to be considered. The grand jury process did not follow proper procedures, as you would know if you have been following the news.
I have been following the news. I won't ask you in what way they failed to follow procedure at the moment. I'll just say that they were still intelligent adults who heard a lot of evidence and concluded that he was innocent. What is your evidence that he wasn't?
It's by no means evidence that the police officer was telling the truth, but in terms of plausibility, but you are aware, right, that the victim had just robbed a store and physically bullied the clerk who tried to stop him?