@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Is Mo 's natural father completely out of the picture ?
David - Far be it for me to assume the mantle of
adoptive parent victim, offended by terminology, and I know you intended nothing by your use of "natural father" other than to distinguish him from boomerang's husband, but most adoptive parents prefer the use of the term "birth-mother" or "birth-father."
There is nothing wrong with the term you used, but adoptive parents can be a little sensitive to the occasional insensitivity of those who haven't adopted. Again, "natural" isn't insensitive. It's a hell of a lot better than "real father" or "real mother," but "birth-parent" is very precisely factual and avoids any connotations.
My oldest is adopted and we have two biological children as well. I wish I had a dollar for every time some (I guess) well-meaning but insensitive person told my wife or I how happy they were for us that we had our "own" children or "real" children.
When my wife was pregnant with our second child, her aunt told her she hoped it was a boy so she could have a son. My wife answered that we already had a son, to which her aunt replied "I know, but I mean a
real son." My wife told her that our oldest was as "real" a son as we would ever hope to have, and that was that, although I don't think her aunt got it.
I've never lit into anyone making a comment like my wife's aunt unless they didn't take the hint and kept it up, but very few do. I think it's something of a generational thing or at least it tends to be more prevalent with people with cultural backgrounds that place a heavy emphasis on bloodlines.
While I'm at it, it also irritates me when someone is identified by someone outside the family as "the adoptive brother," the "adoptive mother," etc. You see it a lot on TV. I could understand if the context was adoption but it doesn't have to be. My wife watches a show that involves a morbidly obese person losing a tremendous amount of weight over a year's time. I like to see what the person looks like going in and then I leave the room and she calls me back when the transformed, svelte individual is revealed. The change is always amazing, and the last "weigh-in" is on a stage surrounded by a lot of people including the family of person who has lost the weight. On one recent show, the camera focused on some guy in the audience and there was a tag line on the screen: "John's adoptive brother, Bill." I can't for the life of me figure out what purpose was served by identifying Bill as the adoptive brother.
During the Olympics, one of the athletes kept being identified as
adopted and his parents introduced as his
adoptive parents. Again, what was the purpose? I may be too touchy about this but I know the way NBC likes to portray all the athletes as overcoming adversity to reach the top of their sport and I'm pretty sure they were pitching a narrative where this guy had overcome the
adversity of being adopted. As this thread illustrates, there can be rough spots that adopted kids have to get through that are unique to them, but as tough as this one may be right now for Mo (and boomerang) on the list of possible problems a child can face growing up, it's pretty low, and that's in large part due to the quality of the people who adopted him. Hell, this athletes parent made the trip to Sochi Russia to cheer him on, and he was involved in a sport that would have required a lot of time and money spent by his Mom and Dad over many years, so without knowing them personally I feel pretty confident they were good parents, or at least didn't present an
adversity to overcome.
Anyway, I'm not criticizing you for anything David, your post just gave me the opportunity to express an irritating fact of life about being an adoptive parent. It's clearly a negligible price to pay for the joy brought to us by our son, but I wanted to get it off my chest.