@panzade,
panzade wrote:But how do you know this?
Because I am capable of comparing my existing plan with the plans being offered on the exchanges.
Currently I have traditional insurance where I can be treated by anyone, without bothering with any sort of "network" nonsense. And my maximum out of pocket expenses are only $250 a year.
There is no traditional insurance being offered on the exchanges. The closest thing I can get is a PPO where I will only be fully covered if I stay within a network. And that PPO has maximum out of pocket expenses of $5100 a year.
So that is simultaneously both less choice and less coverage for me.
PBS NewsHour also recently had a guy named Robert Laszewski on their show, and he also had a pretty good plan that is being canceled:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/government_programs/july-dec13/healthcare_10-29.html
It sounds like his plan wasn't quite as good as the one I have, but still nice.
panzade wrote:Show me some people who are genuinely hurt by ACA...somebody who is being forced to accept a low quality plan.
Low quality or lower quality?
I wouldn't say the exchange plans are low quality. Just that they are not as good as the plans that some people are being forced to give up.
I don't consider myself as being harmed by this. Like I said, I'm delighted that rescissions are being outlawed, and I'll gladly take this change. But the claim that only substandard plans are being eliminated, that is completely untrue.
If you want to see someone who is going to be hurt by this, look to the people joining up to expanded Medicaid. When poor people start losing their homes to the government instead of passing them on to their children when they die, that is going to devastate our lower middle class.