17
   

Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

NSFW Forums: News, Pervert, Child Pornography, Perverts, Creeps
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 02:24 am
@izzythepush,
Good point, very good point:)
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 02:24 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Neither of you are interested in anything other than abusing women and children. At least you're not pretending any more.


Thus giving yourself permission to ignore what I claim to be interested in. You have well staked out your position that you are uninterested in the truth....how many more times are you going to come back to this thread and make the point yet again?
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 02:28 am
@hawkeye10,
But you like that Hawkeye, the attention.... Urking people.... Lurking....Smile

Sorry Izzy I just needed to add...
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 02:34 am
@hawkeye10,
How many times do I have to point out how stupid you are Chicken Little? I don't need permission to disregard the slack-jawed arguments of a couple of morons. The fact that you're both abusers of women and children is a good reason to shun you as well.

Can I make something perfectly clear. I'm not calling you stupid to insult you. I'm calling you stupid because it's a statement of fact. If you were so Zen, you'd have a epiphany and realise what a thick **** you really are. That won't happen, because you're so stupid you believe your own hype.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 02:39 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

How many times do I have to point out how stupid you are Chicken Little? I don't need permission to disregard the slack-jawed arguments of a couple of morons. The fact that you're both abusers of women and children is a good reason to shun you as well.

Can I make something perfectly clear. I'm not calling you stupid to insult you. I'm calling you stupid because it's a statement of fact. If you were so Zen, you'd have a epiphany and realise what a thick **** you really are. That won't happen, because you're so stupid you believe your own hype.


An yet you show up with not a single example. Telling. You are blowing smoke in the hopes that the herd is stupid enough to follow your call to ignore the questions and points that we raise. I doubt that you will succeed, A2Ker's tend to be too curious and to independent for that scam to work, but I know you will keep trying.
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 02:55 am
@hawkeye10,
So I am a herd? Or you haven't heard?

Just as an example, we read your crap and shake our heads, you won't even reply to points made at you, because all you want to do is make YOUR point:)

When someone says F you or C, I see you smiling...

The only good thing you have said is it's equality with you and your wife, however, I tend to think you were the leader and got her into things she didn't want to do.

Yet, you won't answer that, let alone how your kids think about you, and your beliefs.

Any child is a child until 18....

Any child looked at as pornography by a man doesn't deserve to have children, you don't deserve to have had children and I hope that your Restaurant is not a front aimed at kids.

5 years is nothing, hope you get it one day babe.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 03:00 am
@FOUND SOUL,
Quote:
you won't even reply to points made at you, because all you want to do is make YOUR point:)
I respond to others all the time, but I can only speak for me so when I speak I make MY point only. This is how conversation is done but I really dont have time to teach you such rudimentary skills.

Quote:
Yet, you won't answer that, let alone how your kids think about you, and your beliefs.
care to narrow that down some? I am opening a restaurant, I dont have time to write a magnum opus
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 03:07 am
@hawkeye10,
Now we are getting somewhere finally you reply to me, aweee thanks hawkeye not

So you two demand Firefly to answer you? But you advise me, only if I want to and I don't want to, not to you, sure you are not JG?

You'd be suprised to learn more about me, Hawkeye if I ever gave you the opportunity which I won't , you'd realise I don't need any of your teaching..

Nor do your children, bless them, hope they never had any wrong teachings.

You getting mad?

I think so, how does it feel in reverse?

To have people come here saying F, C, you lap that up...

To tell me, you're not worth my time to answer, oh but I'll answer just makes you contradict that .

Let me repeat, a child is a child until 18 in accordance with the law but you know that.
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 03:09 am
@hawkeye10,
Edit your post, I noted.
What part of that question did you not understand?
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 03:10 am
@FOUND SOUL,
Quote:
Let me repeat, a child is a child until 18 in accordance with the law but you know that.
That is great, but since no one has disputed that your point is a bit cryptic.
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 03:14 am
@hawkeye10,
I suggest you re-read, Bill disputes it, for one, a 17 year old doing porn should be allowed to do so

Shame, I am signing off, love to argue more but I have a life outside of this computer , and have a date... with my man, solo, as it should be.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 03:19 am
@FOUND SOUL,
Quote:
I suggest you re-read, Bill disputes it, for one, a 17 year old doing porn should be allowed to do so


You speak of what is, Bill speaks of what should be.....were you under the misunderstanding that you were comparing apples to apples rather than apples to oranges?

I repeat my earlier comment, you really need a better game if you want to stick around here, A2K is nor operating at the elementary school educational level.
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 03:55 am
@hawkeye10,
Hawkeye, my Fiance says hi, go answer him.

I speak of reality, what is, what is, is polically correct.. It's law and it's made by good judgement. What Bill speaks of is "his opinion", "your opinion" that should NOT be... You were under the misunderstanding that there is no comparing only some wimpy persons wanting to change the law, to suit themselves, or you at least.

Quit judging if I belong here, you rage people deliberately, we laugh with and at JG but mainly with... You don't "get" that Adult Porn is concensual, Child Porn is not... they are not of an age that they can even judge the likes of you, some old man who tells them "stories"...

I hope to hell your kids have no stories or nighmares.

I laugh at your thoughts of me, I'd beat you hands down in a lot of things but you'll never know that, as I don't wish to know you, rather, correct you as you are in-deed wrong in your morals, thoughts, and playing god, of what you believe should be changed in the laws to suit you
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 05:36 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
An yet you show up with not a single example. Telling. You are blowing smoke in the hopes that the herd is stupid enough to follow your call to ignore the questions and points that we raise. I doubt that you will succeed, A2Ker's tend to be too curious and to independent for that scam to work, but I know you will keep trying.

Below is one example of where I pointed out what a stupid ******* idiot you are. I'm way too busy to point out others, but we both know it's something I do on a regular basis. You are very stupid, and you don't even realise that. The only person you've managed to impress is Bill, who is eager to play the slobbering, drooling Ygor to your Fuckwitstein.
http://able2know.org/topic/178691-9#post-4767669
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 05:38 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
I repeat my earlier comment, you really need a better game if you want to stick around here, A2K is nor operating at the elementary school educational level.


Well you can always dream Fuckwit, one day you may rise to the dizzy heights of moron.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 06:02 am

Its a shame that we choose
to use the forum for the expression of raw emotion
hurling impassioned negative ad hominem comments, rather than for factual analysis.

No one on any side of any argument has requested evaluation of his intellect.

I have had occasion to represent the libertarian, laissez faire capitalist position
in argument with nazis and with commies, but we employed mutual courtesy.





David
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 06:29 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I doubt very much that either of the Nazis or Communists were as profoundly stupid as Chicken Little.
BillRM
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 09:56 am
@FOUND SOUL,
Quote:
I suggest you re-read, Bill disputes it, for one, a 17 year old doing porn should be allowed to do so

Shame, I am signing off, love to argue more but I have a life outside of this computer , and have a date... with my man, solo, as it should be.


I suggest you read my posts more carefully as my position is if a 17 years old wish to send her boyfriend a naked and or sexual picture of herself that should not be a crime for either of them to do.

Not that poeple younger then 18 years olds should be allow to take part in the commerce porn industry.

Oh and the law on child porn should be change so that commerce pictures/videos of 16/17 should still be illegal however the punishment for having them should be minor and not the same as it someone had such videos of young children being abused.

Posts after posts dealing with this subject and people still get my positions wrong how amazing.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 10:56 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
And now we get to the truth of the matter, the two paedophiles swap techniques on how to best get hold of the most disgusting **** on line. Neither of you are interested in anything other than abusing women and children. At least you're not pretending any more.


Hmm since when is BDSM child porn and since when is the only once that get "abused" in the DBSM sub-culture women.

Let see what do you call those women with the whips and the tight black outfits oh yes Dominatrix.

So you wish to made DBSM as illegal as child porn under the theory I would assume that adult women are in fact children in your eyes so any consent they give to be part of that sub-culture can not be valid.

You right once more Hawkeye they are out to lock up members of you sub-culture or at least lock the men up and recondition the women by force.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Fri 16 Dec, 2011 11:01 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
I doubt very much that either of the Nazis or Communists were as profoundly stupid as Chicken Little.
SOME of them were stupider. Some of them did very stupid things.
For instance, Hitler ( a Nazi ) intentionally got the 3rd Reich into
a 2 front war with US !





David
 

Related Topics

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn - Discussion by tsarstepan
T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
RIP Professor Snape - Alan Rickman Passes at 69 - Discussion by engineer
Fergusonj shooting, autopsy in, all shots from front - Discussion by gungasnake
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Berry's desperate 911 call to police - Discussion by smithy988
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class
  3. » Page 44
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 01/26/2025 at 12:14:35
▲ ▼