@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:So much for the Constitution saying we citizens have the right to presumption of innocents...the state flat out refuses to follow that part of the law.
... "
despicable actions" ... "
horrible crime" ... you still stand by your prediction that he was watching home movies?
You think it's highly unlikely a pedophile would watch kiddie porn on a public airplane, I think it's highly unlikely a police spokesperson would refer to the defendant watching home movies of his kids as "despicable actions," and a "horrible crime." But we shall see.
A defendant is presumed innocent in a court of law, not by the police. The police evidently believe he's guilty of a crime, and that's why they charged him with that crime. The "presumption of innocence" means the prosecution has the burden to prove the defendant's guilt of the charged crime.