Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

No, nothing about burkas. He's saying adult men who get sexually aroused by very young girls have a problem and are clueless as to why it is a problem.

If the forensic examination proved negative, then possibly he could sue the passenger, the airline, the police, or all three

(vii) depicted or portrayed in any pose, posture or setting involving a lewd exhibition of
the unclothed genitals, pubic area, buttocks or, if such person is female, a fully or
partially developed breast of the child; with knowledge of the nature or content thereof
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than five years or in a
jail or house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not
less than $1,000 nor more than $10,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment for the
first offense, not less than five years in a state prison or by a fine of not less than $5,000
nor more than $20,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment for the second offense, not
less than 10 years in a state prison or by a fine of not less than $10,000 nor more than
$30,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment for the third and subsequent offenses.

I'm not talking about a 17 year old in a bikini and you know it

Somewhere in my house is likely a commercial VHS tape of a 1980s movie by the name of the Coke Cola Cowboy that had a shower scene of a very well build young woman showering with what is suppose to be her 8/10 years old daughter. The movie by the way is a light comedy and not a sex film in any way.

Somewhere in my house is likely a commercial VHS tape of a 1980s movie by the name of the Coke Cola Cowboy that had a shower scene of a very well build young woman showering with what is suppose to be her 8/10 years old daughter.

I see you remember it well.

If someone is suspected of something like that in a public place, there is little time for someone to clear their computer of any traces of evidence before it is removed from them.

Even a simple history delete will NOT get rid of all traces of what you were viewing. Nor will deleting all content on your memory disk or hard drive.

There are free programs for simple searching that let you " disk dig" and retrieve any information EVER saved on a disk in a certain amount of time no matter how it was deleted or reformatted.

Having seeing people have things taken on an airplane, there is NO warning, and NO time .... they descend on you immediately . I can only imagine that is how this was done as well.

By Radar Staff

The man arrested after being discovered watching child pornography on a Delta flight from Utah to Boston Saturday is a high profile college professor, married with two children, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.

Dr. Grant D. Smith was arrested by Massachusetts State Troopers after the flight landed at Boston Logan Airport. He's been charged with being in the possession of child pornography.

He's yet to make bail, and a law enforcement official told RadarOnline.com he may face additional charges when he's arraigned Monday.

PHOTOS: Celeb Sex Addiction

Dr. Grant is an accomplished science professor at the University of Utah. His official University biography lists his research interests as "Soft Condensed Matter" and "Ionic and Electrolytic Liquids." He has numerous published articles in academic journals.

He's the father of two, married but, according to his Facebook page, separated from his wife earlier this year.

Officials said Smith was interviewed by troopers when the flight landed in Boston at 4:12 p.m. where sources said he consented to a search of his computer and cell phone. What we have is the equivalent of a confession,” said Murphy.“


“Someone who not only sees it but is smart enough to take a picture of it is very solid evidence. Reporting it immediately to law enforcement, law enforcement then being able to do their own immediate investigation -- that’s a very strong case -- at least at this point.”

"Child Porn" means nothing to me other that the state did not like what he was watching...explain it or show me what it was, and then I could talk about whether this is a bad guy or not. Right now we have no way to know.

It almost sounds like he WANTED
to be arrested, if he were doing so in the open as alleged.

Right ... you have no way to know, and yet you've already proclaimed him innocent.

Quote:

Right ... you have no way to know, and yet you've already proclaimed him innocent.

Where? I said the it was Highly. Highly Unlikely that he was looking at real child porn, but that is not bleaching him. We are conditioned the feel when state charges someone with having "child porn" or of doing a "rape" that we are looking at a monster...I dont do that, some pretty minor offenses get labeled "child porn" and rape, I am holding out for more information about exactly what it was he was looking at.

Trust me, this is going to be yet another case of a man being ruined because he had pics of his kids on his computer that the state does not approve of, or near that. In this case it was a video however.