0
   

The Communist Origin of the Modern Conservative Movement VI

 
 
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2018 08:58 pm
@Baldimo,
Adam Lanzq is still a perfect example of home schooling. Did you miss something? He did not massacre first graders while he was in public school it was only after he was isolated in home schooling that he decided to massacre grade schoolers. The primary purpose of public education is an education, but socialization is an important goal also. Children have to learn not only how to get along with their peer group but how to handle social situations. Not only is the isolation of home schooling bad for the child it prevents them from getting help for psychological problems. Parents are seldom objective when it comes to their children especially if they have mental problems. School councilors are trained to spot troubled children.

Your reference totally ignores the fact Lanza was home schooled at the time of the massacre.

Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 03:09 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Blah-blah-blah. The point is that you defensively tried to compare a personal argument with someone on a message board with the current "free speech" controversies on college campuses. There is no comparison and I suggest you read the link I provided to help clarify the difference.

No, it's actually a tactic employeed by many leftist on this board against anyone who doesn't agree with them. The same type of tactic is used by leftists across the US but only on a much larger scale and backed by school admins in Universities. I did read the link and I laughed at the bias of the piece, calling Milo Alt-right...

Quote:
This statement reveals that you have the same fundamental misunderstanding of "capitalism" as you have of "socialism". Capitalism developed in response to changing economic traditions over the centuries. It's not a cut-and-dried, ready-to-go ideology which is simply imposed on a society by political economists. There are many forms of capitalism, many of which have adopted components of socialism.

I think it's you who has a fundamental misunderstanding of capitalism, there is nothing more natural than capitalism and the entrepreneurial spirit. Someone see's a need and decides to fulfill that need or service and then charge a price for those services. The barter system is the most basic form of capitalism and didn't require govt to make it happen. Our modern day economy is far more complicated than the barter system but it's roots are the same. Offer a service or product in exchange for an agreed price. You might have sold a bag of grain for a chicken instead of money but it was an agreed upon deal entered into freely by both parties.

Quote:
As to where capitalism has failed, again, it's not a simple system which might "fail" in one instance.

So the simple answer is the capitalist system was never forced on anyone and it hasn't failed...

Quote:
It's a complicated set of economic relationships woven deep into society. Businesses fail all the time, workers are underpaid, vast numbers of people are chronically unemployed.

Businesses do fail but that isn't a failure of capitalism, that would be the success of capitalism. Some business's fail and some succeed, the failure comes when govt prevents business's from failing, ie: banks and financial institutions should have been allowed to fail so others could have been successful in their place.
Some workers are underpaid, but a majority of the people who you think are underpaid, are low skill workers, fast food and the such. The glorious part about being underpaid in one place is that you can look for other work that pays better, freedom of choice is a good thing.
"Vast" numbers? Last time I looked, unemployment was at an all time low. If you are unemployed in this market, you are either being very picky or you aren't looking.

Quote:
The "business cycle" illustrates the failures of capitalism, recessions and depressions illustrate the failures of capitalism, and currently the rapacious pursuit of profits which has endangered the intricate natural web of inter-relationships which support life as we know it is a failure of capitalism.

The business cycle isn't a failure of capitalism, it is it's natural progression, do you really think the govt can "smooth" out the market and make it work by their rules? Where has this been successful?
The rest of your comment is more socialist BS. "Rapacious" pursuit of profits is the reason for starting a business and wanting it to be successful, if you don't understand that, then it explains why you think socialism is such a fine system.

Quote:
The depletion of the ozone layer is the result of capitalists seeking to make higher profits. The steadily increasing amount of CO2 in our atmosphere results from shows just how dangerous unregulated capitalism can be. Polluted air and water, the expansion of invasive and destructive species, and the wholesale destruction of natural eco-systems by factory farming are all indictments against capitalism.

You just proved you don't understand anything but left-wing dogma on climate change and socialism. We are so far from "unregulated" capitalism, we have highly regulated capitalism to the point that little kids can't have a lemonade stand in front of their house without a business permit. Take your BS and peddle it somewhere else.

Quote:
The many failures of capitalism are exactly what has made socialism endure. And by "socialism" I mean a political philosophy where cooperation for the public good takes precedence over the mindless pursuit of economic growth, propelled by greed, at the expense of everything else.

"Cooperation" for the public good says you take away someone's business and land, as has been done in every socialist country in the world. The aims are pretty clear, take things from people who made them successful and were making money and then put them into the control of the "workers" who then run the business into the ground where it fails and then closes the doors. No more toilet paper...

You sure had some pretty bad things to say about capitalism and the people who own business's, but I fail to see how your "workers paradise" is going to solve the issues.

Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 03:57 pm
@Zardoz,
Quote:
Schools were one of the first things established in every community. Even children who lived far out in the country had access to one room school houses.

You are correct, but these school were not run by the federal govt, they were controlled by local population.

Quote:
You need to read a little about cults, so you will understand what a cult is. A good basic book to give you a basic understanding of what a cult is: “Cults in Our Midst: The Continuing Fight Against Their Hidden Menace” by Margret Thaler Singer. If you know much about organized religion, you know that they began as small religious cults.

I think I mentioned that in the post, at one point, Christians were a cult at one time, but haven't been considered a cult in over 1500 years. Your bias against religion is pretty clear.

Quote:
The terms are pretty close a mass murder is someone who murders four or more people while a mass shooter is someone who shoots four or more people. The only real difference is that mass shooters are lousy shots. It is clear their intention was to kill. They just lacked the skill, or their guns was not big enough.

I hope your brain is ok after that leap of mental gymnastics you just went through.

Quote:
You suffer under the fantasy that everyone is honest, and no government is necessary.

You are partially right, I tend to think that the vast majority of people are indeed honest, I never said no govt was necessary. This is where your side of the aisle looses the debate, you claimed I want no govt, that isn't the case. I want a smaller govt than we have at current date.

Quote:
If you left corporations to their own devises they would pollute the air until 10s of thousands died each year. You need only to look at pictures of large cities in the 60s.

I don't think they would, they have to live here as well. Our scientific knowledge has increased and so have the business practices of corporations. You paint with too wide a brush.

Quote:
The ungodly greedy have taken over our government with their money.

Which ungodly greedy? Some of the wealthiest people in the world are US citizens who support the political left. This can be proven by showing that the DNC has out raised the GOP money in the last 3 campaign cycles. Obama was the first Presidential candidate who spent $1 billion on his campaign, his GOP rivals didn't even come close. The same happened with Hillary Clinton campaigned for the wealthy and raked in the cash. You should be looking on your side of the aisle for the most corrupt politicians in the US. Maxine Waters reps for one of the poorest area's in LA, she lives in a multi-million dollar mansion... Bernie now owns 3 houses... Hillary Clintons foundation has just about closed up shop in the event of her loss, I wonder why people are not donating to the Clinton Foundation like they were prior to the 2016 election... power and influence have dried up, and so has the cash.

Quote:
Big corporations can now deprive you of your right to sue them. When Wells Fargo fraudulently opened several fraudulent accounts in people’s names when the people went to sue Wells Fargo asserted that they could not be sued because the legal accounts only allowed arbitration to settle disputes.

That isn't true, I was part of a class-action law suit against US bank back in the late 2000's, we won.
Wells Fargo was also sued by a class action lawsuit based on those fraudulent accounts, they settled in court. So yes, you can indeed sue a major company.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wells-fargo-settlement-20170710-htmlstory.html

Quote:
So, Wells Fargo and large corporations cannot be sued because you sign an arbitration agreement any time you apply for a credit card, job or any other type of business with a company. This is just one way the ungodly greedy get richer the CEO of Wells Fargo got 100s of million on this one scam.

He had a base salary of $2.8 million, and when the scandal broke, they took back several millions in compensation... Do you ever get any of these stories correct?
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/28/business/dealbook/wells-fargo-john-stumpf-compensation.html

Quote:
Then you believe it is wrong to tax this criminal stolen money. It was “other people’s” money.

You think all money made by people who are richer than you is stolen, it doesn't matter if they are a CEO or not.


0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 04:23 pm
@Zardoz,
Quote:
Adam Lanzq is still a perfect example of home schooling.

No he isn't. He was in 10th grade when he started home school, everyone around him knew he had issues, this has since been reported, it's easy to find.

Quote:
Did you miss something? He did not massacre first graders while he was in public school it was only after he was isolated in home schooling that he decided to massacre grade schoolers.

It seems you missed a big something, he was 20 years old when he did the shooting, he had been out of school for 2 years.

Quote:
The primary purpose of public education is an education, but socialization is an important goal also.

It's not socialization they are teaching, it's modern day socialism. When we started teaching "sex ed" classes to young school kids, it stopped being about education and became brain washing. When they force 6 year old kids to call another 6 year old boy, a girl, that isn't education, that is indoctrination.

Quote:
Children have to learn not only how to get along with their peer group but how to handle social situations.

You would think so, but kids these days are filled with SJW fervor and need "safe spaces" to protect them from idea's they don't agree with. When my oldest was in middle school, they gave them a "diversity" grade on their report card... a diversity grade? This is the crap they are pushing in the schools today.

Quote:
Not only is the isolation of home schooling bad for the child it prevents them from getting help for psychological problems. Parents are seldom objective when it comes to their children especially if they have mental problems. School councilors are trained to spot troubled children.

You seem to know nothing about homeschooling, excpet what the teachers unions have told you. My little sisters were home schooled for the first few years of their schooling and I can tell you that there is no isolation taking place except in rare cases. The vast majority of home schooled kids partake in all sorts of normal events such as sports and even community theater. You are woefully ignorant of the home school system.

Quote:
Your reference totally ignores the fact Lanza was home schooled at the time of the massacre.

No he wasn't, he was 20 years old and hadn't been in school for a few years before the shooting. He got his HS diploma in 2009... he had applied to 2 different community colleges in the area in 2009 and 2010...
The facts show you are wrong about the timeline, you can stop using Adam Lanza as a weapon against home schools.
https://sandyhooklighthouse.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/adam-lanzas-educational-history/

0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2018 09:08 pm
The big mystery at today’s summit is what went on in the extra 30 minutes. The private summit between Trump and Putin was scheduled for only 90 minutes but ran for two hours. It has finally but revealed what went on in that extra 30 minutes Trump was kissing Putin’s ass.

War has evolved over the years from cave men with clubs to spears and bows and arrows and beyond. I watched a program this weekend on WWI with trench warfare. The English dug tunnels under the German lines and used massive explosives in the tunnels to blow the German positions up. Tanks replaced the horses and planes soon delivered bombs. By WWII missiles, aircraft carriers and atom bombs replaced the trenches of WWI. The new Battlefield according to a Russian General is cyberspace and that is where future wars will be fought. Now there is absolutely no doubt that America was attacked by the Russian military and the dotard claims it is just a witch hunt. Even his administration was appalled at Trump’s kissing up.

Trump is like a school girl meeting a rock star. Trump’s open admiration of brutal dictators shows that he would like to be a dictator. Trump is far more dangerous to America than most believe. If you go to any prison and ask the inmates if they did the crime they were accused, they will deny committing the crime. Putin will never admit that he had his military attack the United States the problem is when the dotard professes to believe it.

0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Tue 17 Jul, 2018 09:02 pm
Trump voter are committing suicide at a record rate and we really can’t blame them. I was surprised to come across the article because god knows it is going to get far worse. The article stated that farmers are committing suicide at record rates and these are the states that voted heavily for Trump. In any war there are always casualties and these farmers are the first casualties in Trump’s trade war. The price of soybeans had already started falling before Trump’s tariffs were put in place because of rumors it would happen. The arithmetic’s is extremely simple if the farmer borrows so much money to plant his crop and the price he can sell it for falls below what he borrowed the farmer is out of business. The farmer’s that are losing farms that have been in the family for 200 years are absolutely devastated. How many more we can expect to die is unknown, but these are just the first wave. The farmers are just getting a taste of what the investors in Trump’s casinos got when Trump bankrupted his casinos.

There is a new Trump doll coming out for Christmas the only problem is when you pull the string it only says one phrase “no collusion.”
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2018 03:34 am
@Baldimo,
Quote:

No, it's actually a tactic employeed by many leftist on this board against anyone who doesn't agree with them.

Wrong again. If you'd just pointed out the use of ad hominem I wouldn't have even objected.
Baldimo wrote:
When you can't refute the evidence, attack the speaker.

A common tactic used by people on any and all sides, your mistake was to attribute it solely to leftists. You're just biased.
Quote:
Someone see's a need and decides to fulfill that need or service and then charge a price for those services.

Which is light years away from the sort of corporate-dominated society we now live in.
Quote:
So the simple answer is the capitalist system was never forced on anyone and it hasn't failed...

And like most simple answers to complex questions it's wrong.
Quote:
Last time I looked, unemployment was at an all time low.

I referred to the "chronically unemployed" — people who don't show up on the unemployment reports because they aren't actively looking for work. There's also a difference between structural and cyclical unemployment. Not to mention the growing income gap. All problems of late stage capitalism.
Quote:
"Rapacious" pursuit of profits is the reason for starting a business and wanting it to be successful, if you don't understand that, then it explains why you think socialism is such a fine system.

I've repeated pointed out that "socialism', as you use the term, doesn't exist. You just use the term as a catch-all for any tendency which doesn't fit the outline of your fictitious libertarian paradise.
Quote:
We are so far from "unregulated" capitalism, we have highly regulated capitalism to the point that little kids can't have a lemonade stand in front of their house without a business permit.

Do you really think big oil, big pharma, big coal, and big banking have anything to do with kids selling lemonade on the street?
Quote:
"Cooperation" for the public good says you take away someone's business and land, as has been done in every socialist country in the world.

It doesn't "say" that at all. Many corporations recognize that investing in communities, directly or indirectly, is the responsible path to take and that it increases business profitability over time.
Quote:
The aims are pretty clear, take things from people who made them successful and were making money and then put them into the control of the "workers" who then run the business into the ground where it fails and then closes the doors.

Blah-blah-blah. More libertarian laissez-fairy tales — as if capitalists never ran businesses into the ground!
Quote:
You sure had some pretty bad things to say about capitalism and the people who own business's...

Aww....
Quote:
but I fail to see how your "workers paradise" is going to solve the issues.

It isn't. Not only because it doesn't exist but also because realistic people don't believe in paradise and don't expect it. Issues can be solved incrementally, one at a time. Empirical conditions dictate possibilities, not ideologies.


Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2018 09:45 am
@Zardoz,
Wow, talk about making connections to something that isn't even there. This article published in Dec of 2017, never once mentions Trump and only touches on politics when dealing with a lack of funding for mental health services back in 1985 and protesting at the USDA hq in DC.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2018 12:01 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Wrong again. If you'd just pointed out the use of ad hominem I wouldn't have even objected.

Wrong? Set's first post in thread to me, did just that and I'm not the only person Set does this too. You have been on this site long enough to know what I'm saying is true. CI, Izzy, Set and a couple of others play these games. It's a microcosm of the extreme left in general.

Quote:
A common tactic used by people on any and all sides, your mistake was to attribute it solely to leftists. You're just biased.

Saying you're bias is equal to someone saying I'm a racist who says vile racist things? Get real, I've actually engaged you in debate, not thrown insults and disparaged your character.

Quote:
Which is light years away from the sort of corporate-dominated society we now live in.

I don't think we live in a corporate dominated society, there are plenty of small business's. We live in a society where govt at all levels makes it harder for small business's to comply with their overly complicated regulations. Coorporations don't have these same issues because they can afford the lawyers and HR people to make sure they are compliant, small business's not so much. When you have to focus on regulation compliance, it takes away from actually running your business and making it successful.

There is no better example to this than the Cable TV/internet business. The only reason there are not more internet providers has nothing to do with Comcast monopoly and everything to do with local govts making the entry costs into their markets prohibitive. The multiple tiers of govt they must go through and the fee's and costs to each one make it impossible actually go and install service in a new city. This article gives you a good idea of what is really going on and why there is no real competition in the internet service industry.
https://www.wired.com/2013/07/we-need-to-stop-focusing-on-just-cable-companies-and-blame-local-government-for-dismal-broadband-competition/

Quote:
Quote:
"So the simple answer is the capitalist system was never forced on anyone and it hasn't failed..."

And like most simple answers to complex questions it's wrong.

The "failures" you attribute to capitalism are not factors of capitalism. Saying pollution is a failure of capitalism is BS. It is a side effect of the modern world, not capitalism. By this logic, none capitalist economies don't pollute their environments, and that's a silly premise. Socialism has nothing to do with "saving the environment" except that it is being used as a tactic to take further control of private businesses.

Quote:
I referred to the "chronically unemployed" — people who don't show up on the unemployment reports because they aren't actively looking for work.

Gee, you call them the "chronically unemployed", I call them lazy. Now there is a world of difference between the people who can work and the people who can't, if you are physically and mentally capable of working and you don't, you are lazy and I don't feel bad for those people.
If we could remove the lazy people from the social welfare rolls, we would have more money for the people who actually need it.

Quote:
There's also a difference between structural and cyclical unemployment. Not to mention the growing income gap. All problems of late stage capitalism.

There is a difference except we haven't had a major shift in our economy in about 20 years, and that was with computers and the internet, both of which spurred on a whole new group of entrepreneurs and business's. People like you said the same thing about farming when people started moving into the cities during the industrial revolution. The same thing was said when we started moving towards more mechanical assembly lines and away from human labor for simple jobs. How about in the 80's when computers came into the equation, and they are now saying the same thing since we are on the "eve" of AI and robots. Each and every time the people have adjusted and so has the economy, fortunes are made and lost and no one has been left in "chronic unemployment" unless they failed to adjust to the new economy by learning new skills. How many people were working in the IT field 20 years ago vs how many work in that field now?

Quote:
I've repeated pointed out that "socialism', as you use the term, doesn't exist. You just use the term as a catch-all for any tendency which doesn't fit the outline of your fictitious libertarian paradise.

Of course it doesn't exist, it has failed everywhere it was tried.

Quote:
Do you really think big oil, big pharma, big coal, and big banking have anything to do with kids selling lemonade on the street?

The fact you think govt regulations only apply to large corporations is cute. Do you think it is only the Feds who have these sorts of regulations, it's at all levels of govt. So a small business owner has regulations from the city, county, state and Feds, not to mention any other sort of district or municipality. There is a website I will have to find for you which lists all the different levels of govt and agencies, which control your daily life with laws and regulations, once you actually see them all in relation to yourself, you begin to wonder exactly how free of a society we really are.

Quote:
It doesn't "say" that at all.

Sure it does, right in the basic principles of socialism:
Quote:
Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership and workers' self-management of the means of production[10] as well as the political theories and movements associated with them.[11] Social ownership may refer to forms of public, collective or cooperative ownership, or to citizen ownership of equity.[12] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them,[13] though social ownership is the common element shared by its various forms.[5][14][15]


Quote:
Many corporations recognize that investing in communities, directly or indirectly, is the responsible path to take and that it increases business profitability over time.

If that is the case, then why codify it with laws and regulations?

Quote:
Blah-blah-blah. More libertarian laissez-fairy tales — as if capitalists never ran businesses into the ground!

Of course they do, and the beauty of capitalism is that we should let those companies fail, no bailouts. You once again think I want no regulations, that isn't the case, I just think we have to many laws and regulations on the books currently. Don't confuse less laws with no laws.

Quote:
It isn't. Not only because it doesn't exist but also because realistic people don't believe in paradise and don't expect it.

Yes they do, they belief that socialism is going to make the world a better more fair place is exactly what they think.

Quote:
Issues can be solved incrementally, one at a time. Empirical conditions dictate possibilities, not ideologies.

You seem to think you can fix the human condition, well you can't. Having to pass laws is proof enough that it can't be done, the only thing we can do is enact punishment for those who fail to follow societies norms, you want to flip those norms into "justice" in the economy. You really think you can make everyone less poor by taking control of someone's company and putting the workers in charge? When you see profit and private property as the enemy, you declare freedom and liberty as the problem.

How do you see our US Constitution as it relates to a "democratic" socialists agenda? It is interesting that the very people who support socialism are also the same people who support gun-control, why is that?
0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2018 09:13 pm
@Baldimo,
Communism is a failed utopian economic system that believed it could control greed. Capitalism is a utopian economic system that believes it can harness greed in the end both will fail. Extremes are seldom the solution the middle road is where the solution will be found. Greed is an economic engine but, in the end, it consumes everything.

Communists are not the only group to realize that religion is a fraud. Polls show the better the education you have the less likely you are to believe the fairy tales. I think we can all believe that ignorance is bad, but one thing is far worse and that is “learned ignorance” and that is exactly what organized religion is. On Sunday mornings I am usually out on a 26-mile bike ride and I pass church after church I refer to churches as ignorance schools.

Organized religion exists for one reason, brain washing like all religious cults it depends on brainwashing small children. Take that away and let the children become adults without being brain washed and organized religion would all but disappear in a few generations. I can well remember the religious cults attempts to brain wash me, but I always valued my ability to think for myself rather than blindly follow the other lemmings off the cliff.

___________________________________________________
Rush Slimbaugh probably best express the conservative position on education when he says on his show that public education should be eliminated. Slimbaugh resents paying property taxes on his multi-million-dollar mansion to pay for schools. The Unions are fighting for funding for public education where the teachers don’t have to provide school supplies. We had a saying at the race track that you can beat cubic inches, but you can’t beat cubic dollars. The cubic dollars are being taken away by the conservative control legislatures to give bigger and better tax cuts to large coal and gas companies.

“We actually fund our school systems at much higher rate than our fellow 1st world nations.” That is like saying all cats are black. School system are run by the state not the federal government. Your reference is dated there is a world of difference since 2013 in fact that is about the point the conservatives gained control of the state legislature here in WV and there have been huge cuts ever since they gained control. But there is one area where huge amounts of money are wasted and that is entertainment (sports) when I was in school the high schools played football at the local stadium. The university used it on Saturdays and the high schools used it on Friday night. It was a grass field now each high school has a multi-million-dollar sport complex with astro-turf that must be replaced every few years at a million-dollar cost. No one can play football on grass anymore.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2018 12:35 pm
@Zardoz,
Quote:
Communism is a failed utopian economic system that believed it could control greed. Capitalism is a utopian economic system that believes it can harness greed in the end both will fail.

You can't even get the basic terms correct. Communism is a political system which sits on top of socialism, the economic system, you can't have Communism without socialism and both function on the principle that they will create a utopia. Capitalism on the other hand is just an economic system and it in no way says it will create a utopia, just the best circumstances for which everyone can prosper, which is the truth.

Quote:
Extremes are seldom the solution the middle road is where the solution will be found. Greed is an economic engine but, in the end, it consumes everything.

You conflate profit with greed and there is nothing wrong with profit. If no one was seeking profit, nothing in our modern day life would exist. People would still invent things, but it is selling their product which makes it worth the work, risk and investment.

Quote:
Communists are not the only group to realize that religion is a fraud.

I'm not a religious person in the slightest, but to call religion a fraud is pretty bad. Religion in and of itself isn't a bad thing, people have turned it into a bad thing. Socialism is a fraud, but people follow it just as blindly as the religious follow their human leaders.

Quote:
Polls show the better the education you have the less likely you are to believe the fairy tales.

Which polls are these? There happen to be plenty of highly educated people who are religious, to include Obama. There are even plenty of religious scientists, who don't conflate their religion with their seeking of knowledge, if anything they are using science to figure out how God created everything, they don't believe in magic, there was no snapping of fingers in their minds as they approach their research.

Quote:
I think we can all believe that ignorance is bad, but one thing is far worse and that is “learned ignorance” and that is exactly what organized religion is. On Sunday mornings I am usually out on a 26-mile bike ride and I pass church after church I refer to churches as ignorance schools.

That's because you have an extremely bigoted response to religion. I don't go to church either, and use my time to shop while people are in church. I do the same thing football season. My team isn't the local team and they almost never play at the same time, so I can shop and drive the roads with less interference. Maybe instead of being a dick, you could thank them for making sure you have clear roads to enjoy your morning bike rides.

Quote:
Organized religion exists for one reason, brain washing like all religious cults it depends on brainwashing small children.

Don't confuse cults with normal religion, although you have made your feelings on this pretty clear already.

Quote:
Take that away and let the children become adults without being brain washed and organized religion would all but disappear in a few generations.

So make a law preventing people from going to church? There are plenty of people who come to religion later in life. From my expereince, children who are forced to attended church usually have an adverse reaction to religion, like in your case. In my opinion, teenagers will usually rebel against most anything, to include religion. The problem comes from parents continuing to force their children to church when they have clearly shown they don't want to go. Thankfully in our country, a majority of parents don't do this anymore. Religious extremism has been greatly reduced in the US.

Quote:
I can well remember the religious cults attempts to brain wash me, but I always valued my ability to think for myself rather than blindly follow the other lemmings off the cliff.

You are still a lemming but for socialism, the brain washing just went to the left side of the spectrum instead of the right side.

Quote:
Rush Slimbaugh probably best express the conservative position on education when he says on his show that public education should be eliminated.

I don't listen to Rush, but I can tell you I have heard this before and what he actually says is abolish the federal dept of education and return control of the school system to the local level, there is no Constitutional mandate for federal control over the education system. Since we have had a federal dept of education, our education system has gotten worse and the standards have dropped.

Quote:
Slimbaugh resents paying property taxes on his multi-million-dollar mansion to pay for schools.

We don't pay property taxes to the federal govt, so this is a BS statement on the feds and school funding.

Quote:
The Unions are fighting for funding for public education where the teachers don’t have to provide school supplies.

The unions care nothing about the kids or the actual teachers themselves. They only care about the money they can extract from the teachers and the taxpayers to fund their own salaries and their chosen political candidates.
Why are schools paying for children's school supplies? Every year the schools hand out lists of the things the parents have to buy for their kids and to supply the school, you have things backwards. If the schools spent less money and "school administrators" with made up titles, of which there are hundreds in some school districts, then they could afford to buy the dry markers and other such school supplies that are need by the teachers.

Quote:
We had a saying at the race track that you can beat cubic inches, but you can’t beat cubic dollars. The cubic dollars are being taken away by the conservative control legislatures to give bigger and better tax cuts to large coal and gas companies.

You talk as if the money earned by those companies belongs to the govt and by letting them keep more of their own profits, they are "stealing" from the govt, that is some twisted thinking.

Quote:
School system are run by the state not the federal government. Your reference is dated there is a world of difference since 2013 in fact that is about the point the conservatives gained control of the state legislature here in WV and there have been huge cuts ever since they gained control.

If that is the case, why is there a federal dept of education and why do they have any say over the school requirements and funding? Don't meet the Federal guildlines on education, you get no money from the feds. Stop lying about how our education system works.
If my reference is out of date, then provide a more up to date one. The left has a twisted version of what a "cut" actually is. There is no actual cuts in funding, if one year you got a 5% increase and the next year you only get a 4% increase, you have cut nothing but the actual increase. The way the left describes a cut is exactly that, but in reality a cut would be a 5% increase one year, and then taking back 1% the next year.
If you think we have started spending less than other nations in education, you would be wrong. It isn't a matter of money, but how that money is spent which makes the difference.

Quote:
But there is one area where huge amounts of money are wasted and that is entertainment (sports) when I was in school the high schools played football at the local stadium. The university used it on Saturdays and the high schools used it on Friday night. It was a grass field now each high school has a multi-million-dollar sport complex with astro-turf that must be replaced every few years at a million-dollar cost. No one can play football on grass anymore.

So you are going to compare the 1970's to the 2000's? As far as I know, a majority of the schools budget still go towards education. My sons high school didn't have very good sports teams, so instead the school shifted that money towards the music and arts programs. They have one of the best programs in Denver Metro and have expanded from just a single band and orchestra to about 3 each, my son played the Viola from 5th grade until he graduated high school. In essence, it really depends on what the school is good at and where they choose to spend their money.

As for the turf over grass debate, I don't care. I don't think each school has their own field, you will have multiple schools use the same field, one school has their game Friday night and the other has theirs on Sat or Sat night.
This is the way the fields work in my sons old school dist. Here in CO where we don't get a lot of rain during the summer months, dry climate, turf would be a much better option vs watering. Do govt lands pay the same rate for water as I do? With the way they restrict me from watering my lawn to the way they will water city parks in the middle of the day, killing the grass, I wonder if they pay a cheaper rate because they are the govt and control the water suppler.

0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Thu 19 Jul, 2018 09:07 pm
@Baldimo,
When Reagan cut taxes for the ungodly greedy the states followed suit cutting taxes on the ungodly greedy. When taxes are cut on the ungodly greedy government services also have to be cut. Conservatives hate government and when cuts had to be made public schools were an easy target because of the amount of tax dollars spent. The cuts to public school funding are old as Republican tax cut fever and it was especially severe to state colleges. The cuts to colleges were not as noticeable because the cost could be shifted to the students. America provided affordable college educations prior to the conservative rise to power. I could easily pay my tuition and buy my books by mowing a few lawns this compares to people coming out of school today owing $300,000 in student loans. If each college student kicks in $300,000 think what tremendous tax cuts the Republicans can give the ungodly greedy. The problem with public schools is you can’t get first graders to borrow $300,000 to pay for their education, yet. The only alternative left to the Republicans was to gut the funding to public schools and just let them deteriorate. Letting teachers provide the school supplies out of their pocket that is just a cost shift.

There may be a few school systems in the ungodly greedy neighborhoods that are better funded, but they are the exception not the rule. There are no free lunches or free educations.

____________________________________________________
You may watch soap operas, but it is evident you don’t spend much time watching the news or you would have seen the materials that the teachers were expected to teach from. The most important mission for America’s future is the education of the next generation while the Republicans believe the most important mission in America is to make the ungodly greedy far richer.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 20 Jul, 2018 01:16 pm
@Zardoz,
Quote:
When Reagan cut taxes for the ungodly greedy the states followed suit cutting taxes on the ungodly greedy.

Just like with every other tax cut, everyone received a tax cut, the rich got a bigger tax cut because they were paying the most. Our taxes are finally coming down to reasonable levels.

Quote:
When taxes are cut on the ungodly greedy government services also have to be cut.

We differ on what the responsibility of govt is. I favor the Constitution, you favor Marx.

Quote:
Conservatives hate government and when cuts had to be made public schools were an easy target because of the amount of tax dollars spent.

They don't hate govt, they dislike the size of our current govt and want to see it smaller, not gone. We shouldn't have a federal dept of education, that money should go directly to the states and school districts.

Quote:
The cuts to public school funding are old as Republican tax cut fever and it was especially severe to state colleges.

Links?

Quote:
The cuts to colleges were not as noticeable because the cost could be shifted to the students. America provided affordable college educations prior to the conservative rise to power. I could easily pay my tuition and buy my books by mowing a few lawns this compares to people coming out of school today owing $300,000 in student loans.

When are you going to realize that govt makes everything more expensive. Instead of being made at the loan companies, find out why the cost of college has risen so much... student loans are the answer. If you have a guaranteed pool of money and don't have to worry about costs, you will do nothing to control those costs.

Quote:
If each college student kicks in $300,000 think what tremendous tax cuts the Republicans can give the ungodly greedy.

Which school are you looking at that costs $300k, most state schools are around 20-25k a year to attend, so a four year degree with cost about $100k. Stop making **** up with the most extreme examples you can think of, it doesn't help your argument.

Quote:
The problem with public schools is you can’t get first graders to borrow $300,000 to pay for their education, yet. The only alternative left to the Republicans was to gut the funding to public schools and just let them deteriorate. Letting teachers provide the school supplies out of their pocket that is just a cost shift.

I can tell you don't know **** about modern day schools except what the Union Overlords tell you. We haven't cut spending on schools and we continue to spend more on education than any other first world nation except for like 2 very small wealth countries.

Quote:
There may be a few school systems in the ungodly greedy neighborhoods that are better funded, but they are the exception not the rule. There are no free lunches or free educations.

Most school systems are actually doing ok, if you don't listen to the Unions. The minorty of schools not doing well are in poorer area's and they happen to get a bunch of money, but fail to spend it properly. They waste it on "transgender" training for teachers and students.

Quote:
You may watch soap operas, but it is evident you don’t spend much time watching the news or you would have seen the materials that the teachers were expected to teach from.

I don't watch much tv anymore, we actually "cut the cord" last week, I watch a lot of video's on blacksmithing, I'm getting ready to start making knifes and "m building my knowledge base on the subject. TV will rot your brain.

As for what the teachers have to work with, the media will cherry pick the worst school in an area and then run their story as if the entire school district is suffering this same fate. The media lies for the teachers unions all the time to get more money out of the taxpayers.

Quote:
The most important mission for America’s future is the education of the next generation while the Republicans believe the most important mission in America is to make the ungodly greedy far richer.

You don't want to education children, you want to brain wash them in the ways of socialism and social justice dogma. You want to teach the children the ways of Marx and not actually teach them anything useful. We need less classes that crap and more classes on actual US history, not this crap pushed by our current school system.

0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Fri 20 Jul, 2018 09:19 pm
@Baldimo,
Teachers are probably the only group that would spend their own money to buy supplies for their employer. When I worked as a mechanic and the city would run out of money and they did frequently they would bring police cars that were broken down and ask to have them fixed. No auto parts store in town would extend any more credit because they had not been paid. I was not about to buy parts out of my pocket, so they could have a police car. I would always tell them you either buy the parts or park the car. None of the other mechanics offered to buy the parts either. That tells me teachers must be a pretty special group to use their own money to buy supplies for their classroom. My sister is a teacher and she was looking at a face book posting of a new teacher. The teacher had a listing like a bride would have so people would know what to buy for her classroom. She also said some teachers ask for gift cards from certain stores. She was appalled they were doing this but in my view that is far better than buying the supplies out of their pocket. Let’s spread the pain caused by the conservatives around.

____________________________________________________
You don’t know much about human nature and workplace work in clicks. When I was union president the head administration and finance came down to my office. We were in the pross of negotiating a contract but there was no contract in place at the time. She explained to me that they were no longer going to honor the bidding process. From now on the “best qualified” would be awarded the job. The contract specified that the senior person who met the minimum job qualifications got the job. I told her there are only two systems a seniority system and a suck system. When she left my office, she was not very happy I am not a diplomat. One her first hires under the new system was a maintenance man responsible for the city buildings upkeep. A newer employee with far less seniority was hired. The employee often would call saying he was at another city building when in fact he was at home and that is when he wasn’t screwing one of the secretaries on his desk. But one thing I will say for him he was a hell of a suck.

____________________________________________________
Next thing she tells me she has someone qualified to be a building inspector. I wondered who this could possibly be since the qualification for building inspector is 10 years’ experience in construction. Who was that fabulously qualified employee? The Janitor of course. Does he have the experience? No but he was the very best suck I ever ran into. If sucking was an Olympic sport this guy would have won, it ten times. When ask to inspect a roof he refused. He never inspected one roof. He claimed he was to heavy to get on a roof. I caught a construction company pouring a driveway that was only 2 inches deep (required 6 inches on city right- of way) he let them pour it. He hated conflict of any kind. The whole department went to the mayor to complain how totally incompetent he was. The head of administration was run off and the union contract was put back and the total incompetence came to a screeching halt. Her time was better spent screwing the police chief and let alone a system that worked for 45 years.

Suck systems work on oh I go to church with you. I like you. You can see the clicks in the police department and you can always tell what click is in control as to who is on day shift. Suck systems are far worse than the alternative. I always hated sucks they would always work so hard when the boss was in site but as soon as he was gone they were the laziest employee in the shop. But when you would ask the boss they would always say the sucks were the very best employees.
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2018 09:09 pm
@Baldimo,
Conservatives live in an alternative universe made up of alternative facts. Did you see how many days on strike it took to get even a few percentage points of a raise in WV? The conservatives fought tooth and nail here in WV to stop any raise. If there was no union, there would not have been a penny for anyone. Teachers would make better money at a corner convenience store. The teachers in WV have been making less each year because increases in insurance, rising deductibles and copays. One teacher has no power to ever get a pay raise only in a group is their power.

Conservatives specialize in perfect world solutions that only works in a perfect world where reality does not intrude. In the real world all work places have clicks one click can always justify giving pay raises to their click or sucks. When the other click is in power the situation reverses itself. You can’t overcome human nature. What you would create giving the teachers pets big pay raises is a very hostile work environment would not only harm morale between the teachers, but it would also be toxic for the children.

____________________________________________________
Every job has its perks and drawbacks. One problem with that is that some schools are now year-round, and teachers put in a lot of hours off the clock that they are not compensated for while other jobs require overtime pay for extra work. Wal Mart was successfully sued for having employees work during their break. My wife was paid years after she retired. If teachers filed a class action suit for compensation for all their off-hour work, they would win a substantial settlement.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you really believe a non-union teacher would ever get a raise when the conservatives had a choice between giving another $500 million-dollar tax cut to coal companies or a pay raise to teachers? That was what was going on in WV massive tax cuts were being given to big gas and oil companies. After the conservatives handed out 100s of million they would say we can’t give you a pay raise we have no money after giving the tax cuts to big business. The next year the story was the same after the third year of multi-million tax cuts push had come to shove. Non-union teachers can’t defend themselves.
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Sun 22 Jul, 2018 09:18 pm
@Baldimo,
You might make 80k but if you were a teacher you would not make that amount. You may have some unique job skill that is in short supply. The job market operates on supply and demand and there are millions of teachers in America but that doesn’t mean teachers should not be paid a living wage. When there are no unions public employees are paid far less than other workers with the same skills and education level. In Kentucky some public employees work for free all they get is health insurance. They are second wage earners whose husbands are farmers or truck drivers with no health insurance. You are so big on freedom, but you don’t believe in the freedom to organize. Big corporations giving big campaign contributions has been deemed freedom of speech likewise the right to organize should fall under that freedom. Corporations have been granted all of the freedoms of an individual by the supreme court because under the theory of the individuals involved in corporation the same rights should be granted to unions as they are just an organization like a corporation.

____________________________________________________
The Republicans always believe that corporation should be able to contribute unlimited amounts of money, but unions should not be able to make political contributions. Money is now a big determining factor in what laws are passed. Republicans don’t want a level playing field in fact they want to prevent the other team from taking the field. Republicans hate unions because they seldom got any contributions from unions. Traditionally Republicans represent big business interests and tried to overturn the laws that helped unions have a level playing field.
____________________________________________________

School Board elections are local elections and if you lie to get elected you must face the consequences. The Governor of KY tried to strip the teachers of their pensions. He had the bill passed during a secret after hours session only to have it overturned by the courts. He need not bother to run for any political office ever again. Republicans are thieves at heart. Once you make a bargain and then you let people work for 40 years and say oh I am sorry I am going to take it away to give big tax cuts to big businesses you are no more than a low life thief.

____________________________________________________
I have no idea how you have an 80k a year job and cannot understand basic taxes that any sixth grader could do. Eighty percent of people file the short form that the sixth graders could easily do. Next year when the taxes are done, and people find out that not enough money was taken out of their checks and they have to pay more taxes than they paid the year before there will be lynch mobs looking for Republicans.

____________________________________________________
Sorry but history says otherwise, Comrade Whitaker Chambers, Comrade Irving Kristol, Comrade James Burnham, and Comrade Kevin Smant are just a few of the communists, look them up. These were all published authors (I have their books in my library) they were extremely influential in founding the modern conservative movement. You can lie about history but you can’t wave your hand and make it go away. The substantial contribution of communists to the modern conservative movement can never be overlooked.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2018 10:34 am
@Zardoz,
Quote:
Teachers are probably the only group that would spend their own money to buy supplies for their employer. .

They aren't buying supplies for their employer, they are buying supplies for their own work environments. Are teachers supplying copy paper or toilet paper?
It's no different than a mechanic who has to buy their own tools, they don't use the "shop" tools, the shop doesn't keep tools in house for employee use. My son works for Pep Boys and they don't provide tools, the Snap-On truck stops by a couple time a week and they buy what they need, is that fair?

Quote:
That tells me teachers must be a pretty special group to use their own money to buy supplies for their classroom.

You would be surprised by how many professionals have to provide things out of their own pocket to do their jobs.

Quote:
The teacher had a listing like a bride would have so people would know what to buy for her classroom. She also said some teachers ask for gift cards from certain stores. She was appalled they were doing this but in my view that is far better than buying the supplies out of their pocket. Let’s spread the pain caused by the conservatives around

Maybe if the school districts spent the taxpayers money better, the teachers would have money for basic school room supplies that the school should be providing. How many administrators does a school/district really need?

Quote:
You don’t know much about human nature and workplace work in clicks.

I seem to know more about human nature than you do. Work place cliques? I guess working in govt, these sorts of childish things do take place, most of the grown up places I have worked, real jobs not govt jobs, are not quite like that. You don't have "elected" people in a private work place environment, you have the CEO and his organizational chart. In the real world, it's usually the best people being chosen for a job, if they suck they are fired, no lengthy process to waste more of the companies money, like what happens in govt unions.

The rest of this section just points out the problem with public sector vs the private sector.


Quote:
Suck systems work on oh I go to church with you. I like you. You can see the clicks in the police department and you can always tell what click is in control as to who is on day shift. Suck systems are far worse than the alternative. I always hated sucks they would always work so hard when the boss was in site but as soon as he was gone they were the laziest employee in the shop. But when you would ask the boss they would always say the sucks were the very best employees.

All I hear you explaining is the problem with bureaucratic govt, which unlike the private sector, has no real accountability. You play games in a company and the company goes under, govt's don't go under, they just kick the can down the road until the problem can't be ignored.



0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2018 11:04 am
@Zardoz,
Quote:
Conservatives live in an alternative universe made up of alternative facts.

Says the guy who thinks socialism will work in the US while it has failed everywhere else.

Quote:
Did you see how many days on strike it took to get even a few percentage points of a raise in WV? The conservatives fought tooth and nail here in WV to stop any raise.

I would have fought them as well. When you are not doing your job and instead of "striking" during school time, I wouldn't give you anything either. Do your job and don't leave kids and parents swinging in the wind. Public employees should NEVER be allowed to strike, you work for the taxpayer, no the union.

Quote:
One teacher has no power to ever get a pay raise only in a group is their power.

The left sure has done a good point of shoving that lie down the teachers throats haven't they.

Quote:
Conservatives specialize in perfect world solutions that only works in a perfect world where reality does not intrude.

No, they offer the best realistic solution to a problem. It's the left that like to push the world as a fairy tale we can live in, if it wasn't for those darn righties...

Quote:
In the real world all work places have clicks one click can always justify giving pay raises to their click or sucks.

You once again demonstrate you don't understand how the private sector works.

Quote:
When the other click is in power the situation reverses itself. You can’t overcome human nature. What you would create giving the teachers pets big pay raises is a very hostile work environment would not only harm morale between the teachers, but it would also be toxic for the children.

Harming moral is seeing a teacher who should be fired getting the same raise as you. Knowing you work harder and knowing it doesn't make a difference because the bad teachers will get everything you get is a moral killer, why work hard?

Quote:
Every job has its perks and drawbacks. One problem with that is that some schools are now year-round, and teachers put in a lot of hours off the clock that they are not compensated for while other jobs require overtime pay for extra work.

If teachers are not getting paid overtime, that sounds like a problem with their contract. As for "lot's" of hours after work, I will say again, there are lots of people who do "work" in their "off hours" that they are not compensated for. For the majority of teachers who work a normal schedule, they all get time off during the summer that we non-teachers do not get. My ex-wife works for a school district, so I used to know a lot of teachers and they don't really spend the summer doing anything but relaxing.

Quote:
Wal Mart was successfully sued for having employees work during their break. My wife was paid years after she retired. If teachers filed a class action suit for compensation for all their off-hour work, they would win a substantial settlement.

No they wouldn't, they don't work any harder than anyone else at their job. Only working 9 months a year with 2 weeks at Christmas and at least a week at Spring Break, and I would say teachers have a dream job. The biggest problem faced by teachers is from the students, which have gotten more out of control over the years. Look for news stories on teachers attacked in school, you will be shocked by how many there actually are.

Quote:
Do you really believe a non-union teacher would ever get a raise when the conservatives had a choice between giving another $500 million-dollar tax cut to coal companies or a pay raise to teachers?

Are we talking about a good teacher or a bad teacher? Good teachers would indeed get raises, it's how a business retains a good employee. That's exactly what teachers unions don't want, it exposes the bad teachers that the union protects.

Seeing as how Obama and the EPA devistated the coal industry in WV, I would see tax cuts to bring these jobs back as a smart choice. There is still plenty of coal to be dug up and processed. If they can bring coal jobs back to WV, which is what they are known for, then that will actually increase the taxes collected overall. Coal jobs are good paying jobs and the biggest issue in WV and their economy, came from the loss of those jobs and the taxes that went with them.

Quote:
That was what was going on in WV massive tax cuts were being given to big gas and oil companies.

From what I have read, there has been a big gas and oil boom in WV for the last few years from shale deposits. The more they pull from the ground, the better off we are as a nation. I only wish we could rely on our own deposits of energy.

Quote:
After the conservatives handed out 100s of million they would say we can’t give you a pay raise we have no money after giving the tax cuts to big business. The next year the story was the same after the third year of multi-million tax cuts push had come to shove. Non-union teachers can’t defend themselves.

If Obama and the EPA hadn't killed or nearly killed the coal business in WV, you would have that money. Place the blame where it belongs, on those who killed coal.






0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2018 12:02 pm
@Zardoz,
Quote:
You might make 80k but if you were a teacher you would not make that amount.

I wouldn't say that, depending on where you live depends on what you make and that goes for teachers as well. I've been in my industry for 10 years and it took me this long to earn this much. I'm at the top of my field in what I do, so I earn more money. If I lived near any major city with any sort of tech industry, I would be making well over $100k a year and almost $200k.

Quote:
The job market operates on supply and demand and there are millions of teachers in America but that doesn’t mean teachers should not be paid a living wage.

There's that meaningless term again, "living wage". What teachers should be paid in based on their performance and how in demand their subject is. We really need math and science teachers, they should be paid more than a drama teacher or foreign language teachers.

Quote:
When there are no unions public employees are paid far less than other workers with the same skills and education level.

Gee, I wonder why that is. The private sector actually produces things of value and make money, that makes it easier to pay people what they are worth to the company. Govt produces nothing and depends on the taxpayer to fund them. No one has ever gotten into working for the govt because the money was good, politicians aside, it was a public service.

You lefties betrayed JFK, he once said, "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."

Quote:
In Kentucky some public employees work for free all they get is health insurance. They are second wage earners whose husbands are farmers or truck drivers with no health insurance.

Links?

Quote:
You are so big on freedom, but you don’t believe in the freedom to organize.

I sure do believe in the freedom to organize, but only for the private sector and not for public sector. Public sector employee's are paid for by taxpayers and when they go against "management" they are going against the taxpayers.

Quote:
Big corporations giving big campaign contributions has been deemed freedom of speech likewise the right to organize should fall under that freedom.

I don't disagree with you, I just think there should be no public sector unions.

Quote:
Corporations have been granted all of the freedoms of an individual by the supreme court because under the theory of the individuals involved in corporation the same rights should be granted to unions as they are just an organization like a corporation.

Unions already have the same ability to donate to campaigns, that was part of the ruling for Citizens United.

Quote:
School Board elections are local elections and if you lie to get elected you must face the consequences.

Except if you lie in favor of the unions, then the local media will protect you, as is the case here on CO when the teachers unions forced a "recall election" and lied to the public about the whole event. The amount of outside money that poured into the election from the teachers unions across the country was sham.

Quote:
Once you make a bargain and then you let people work for 40 years and say oh I am sorry I am going to take it away to give big tax cuts to big businesses you are no more than a low life thief.

Colorado is running into the same over promised pension issues as other states. All public union contracts should be cancelled and reworked, all pensions should be cancelled and redone as 401k's. Why should taxpayers have to pay for the retirement of public sector employees? I didn't promise any union member anything.

Quote:
I have no idea how you have an 80k a year job and cannot understand basic taxes that any sixth grader could do.

Says the guy who can't even figure out how to use quotes or links on a webpage... I'm pretty sure a 6th grader could figure it out.

Quote:
Eighty percent of people file the short form that the sixth graders could easily do.

Links for this 80%?

Quote:
Next year when the taxes are done, and people find out that not enough money was taken out of their checks and they have to pay more taxes than they paid the year before there will be lynch mobs looking for Republicans.

I'll remind you of this after Apr 1th 2019.

Quote:
Sorry but history says otherwise, Comrade Whitaker Chambers, Comrade Irving Kristol, Comrade James Burnham, and Comrade Kevin Smant are just a few of the communists, look them up.

I don't doubt that these people once considered themselves Communists, but lots of young and dumb people do, look at our modern day universities, they are pushing out socialists as fast as they can and with the current crop of socialist, they are moving right on to fascism as well.

Quote:
These were all published authors (I have their books in my library) they were extremely influential in founding the modern conservative movement.

Once again I don't doubt that they are former communists, but who better to warn the US about communism than people who once believed in it. They helped create a movement that was founded on the original purpose of our country. Individual liberty and minimal govt control, the exact opposite of what communists want and the modern day leftist want.

Quote:
You can lie about history but you can’t wave your hand and make it go away. The substantial contribution of communists to the modern conservative movement can never be overlooked.

Let me write this the proper way for you, since you bias for socialism is clear.
"The substantial contribution of reformed communists to the modern conservative movement can never be over looked. "
You only hate these people because they prevented socialism from spreading across the US. They protected people's business's and their property from tyranny of the masses, we don't live in a democracy where you can vote to take other people's things, we live in a Constitutional Republic and that bothers the **** out of you.

0 Replies
 
Zardoz
 
  3  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2018 09:13 pm
@Baldimo,
Comrade Whitaker Chambers and the other card-carrying communist are not on the left they are on the right. Don’t think of a political spectrum as a straight line but as a circle were the extremes meet. There is absolutely no doubt that these communists were among the founding fathers of the modern conservative movement. The communists hated the American government and that hate is carried on by the modern conservative movement today.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Did you see the new NRA hat? The R has now been replaced by the hammer and sickle after one of the key members was found to be working for Russia.
The facts are that charter schools can sign up all the students they want but then they can and do reject a number of students. They are paid so much for each student but when they send them back to public school the charter school gets to keep the money. By picking and choosing students they can generate higher test scores while the public schools cannot reject students and are shorted the money. Cubic dollars speak volumes.

____________________________________________________
It is very clear that the ungodly greedy got huge tax cuts while a good portion of the middle class did not get a tax cut, the Republicans fully intended to raise the lower tax bracket from 10% to 12% and tell the fools what a big tax cut they got. Only in the last minutes was a tax raise for the middle class voted down.

____________________________________________________
In some states have already projected that only the richest 65% will get a tax cut in states like New Jersey according to the Tax Policy Center.

____________________________________________________
Don’t kid yourself when families with several children have to pay taxes on an extra $20,000 that money has to come from somewhere and at least some of it will come out of their food budget.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 06/20/2025 at 08:16:02