@FedUpAmerican,
First, let?s deal with the silly statistics fed to us by FedUpAmerican. Two of the states he cites as having particularly high populations of uninsured (California and Texas) are also two of the states having the highest population of illegal aliens. Interestingly, FUA fails to point this out. Neither does he offer any statistics which show that, of those uninsured in these states, how many are illegals. Sorry, but I already see illegal immigrants as a drain on our economy. I just can?t support the idea of taxing me further so they have adequate coverage.
Second, FUA offers us the oft-repeated statistic that 45 million Americans are without health care insurance. Wow, that?s a lot! But, looking at the data from the US Census Bureau, and doing a little sixth grade math, it turns out that?s only 15% of our population. Using a little first grade math from there reveals an astounding 85% of our population has health insurance. Now, FUA, please answer a question for me. Can you name any other program, institution, or social condition that covers 85% of our population, yet that we still consider to be a failure? (Well, there is Social Security. But that?s a government run program, so it?s not exactly a ringing endorsement for a government run healthcare system.)
Finally, there is the window in the statistics cited by FUA that he is hoping you don?t look through. ?Lacking healthcare coverage? does not equal ?lacking healthcare.? Law requires all hospitals to provide treatment to all comers, regardless of ability to pay. So healthcare is available.
A nationalized healthcare program would be a disaster of nearly unrivaled proportions. Consider the recently enacted prescription medicine benefit. This benefit covers only Medicare recipients, and as such is really pretty limited in scope. Nonetheless, the program is riddled with problems. To begin with, the program required participants to choose a specific plan. The number and differences among the plans was huge, and many chose plans that were not in their best interest simply because they were confused by the astounding volume of information that had to be digested. I have even spoken with one or two recipients who simply opted not to choose a plan because they felt it was easier to pay for their own medications rather than try to wade through all the options.
On top of that, within the last few months, it has been reported that the program, only a couple of years old, is woefully underfunded. To the point that current estimates state that just to meet the original goals of the program, it will have to be funded at three times the current level. And this is just for a prescription drug plan that is intended to cover only a minority of our population.
No, I don?t think I want the government involved in healthcare at all. And I have not even discussed the all the other problems with such an idea. Problems like the loss of privacy guaranteed us in our health records. Problems like the bureaucratic nightmare that WILL proceed from such a program. Problems like the decline of healthcare providers that such a program will ensure. Problems like the waiting periods, rationing, and loss of autonomy that such a program will ensure.
And let?s not even discuss the silly, erroneous notion that everyone has a ?right? to healthcare, regardless of ability to pay.