0
   

Bible Party of the USA

 
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Nov, 2007 09:13 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;46845 wrote:
The premise you had was the validity of a belief. I wasn't explaining the validity of my belief from your perspective. I can only explain my belief from my perspective.

Huh? That is very poorly phrased, forgive me for not understanding the point you are trying to make.

I was explaining one reason I have for my for my belief. That reason was the reality that the eyewitness accounts in the Bible are from people who refused to give up their belief in the truth in the face of certain death. If what they believed was untrue, all they had to do was recant their belief and they would avoid torture and a horrible death. The fact they did not recant their belief and chose instead to retain their belief with the knowledge of torture and certain death indicates to me that these believers were not espousing an intellectual argument, but were speaking truth.

The fallacy of your conclusion is that you've made the assumption that a person would know if they were wrong, and that is certainly not the case. It is possible for someone to believe something that they think is true when it is actually false! People may die for a belief that they think is true but in reality it is false!

It can be an indication of the extent of their examination of the truth/reality. If someone experiences something, they know their experience is true.

So those lepprechaun sightings in South Carolina means that lepprechauns exist?

However, the first hand accounts in the Bible show consistency

The bible makes self-references, this is an academic "no-no"!

In fact, more and more discoveries add to the body of proof that the Bible is telling the truth.

Like the discovery of talking snakes and a global flood? I have asked for these discoveries and have yet to see any! The Bible says that bats are birds, but anyone with a 6th grade education can tell you otherwise.

A bad apple can spoil the whole basket.

You didn't say 'most christians' you just said 'christians' don't coerce people into believing, which is not true as i have just demonstrated.

Explain the death camps of Stalin, Hitler, or any of the modern flowerings of atheistic and anti-theistic thought, love, and kindness that resulted in tens of millions of dead.

Hitler definitely wasn't an atheist he made many many statements about working for god....and stalin was an atheist but he was not motivated by atheism, in-fact the personallity cult of Stalin is very dogmatic, specificly you are talking about communist genocide not atheist, the truth is NO Democratic atheist-dominated nation EVER commited genocide, current nations with high proportions of atheists in the population are doing better in the way of education and have much lower crime rates than in the US.

Explain the 45,000,000 dead babies we have produced iun the USA since Roe v Wade. Explain why people on both sides of the debate claim to be Christians or claim to be atheists. What is the difference. The source is the same, evil.

I'm pro-life....don't make too many assumptions about my political beliefs!

Someday, you’ll need to settle down on a belief set and stop exploring/sampling the wines.

Whos says i'm still exploring? I'm an about as atheistic as they come...i use debate to further educate myself, I don't learn about other religions because i am considering them.

I’m not the person who’s seeking answers by attempting to tear holes in other peoples’ beliefs.

atheism technically isn't a belief, it's lack of belief (in a god).

I have mine and have no interest in exploring yours.

That's too bad, one should consistantly look for the truth whether it corrosponds or contradicts current belief. Believing you have the absolute truth and there is no possibility of being wrong is the very epitimy of closed-mindedness.

See above. Also, see my answer concerning my age and experience. Talk, talk, talk doesn’t get you anywhere.

talking with people of different beliefs will educate you (and me).


So you say. What color is a zebra’s skin?

I'm not sure, i think it's black, i could be wrong.



:lightbulb:
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 04:13 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;46848 wrote:
no, god is reference to any god, God is a reference to a specific god!


Sure. It would be to someone with your frame of reference.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 04:28 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;46883 wrote:
Sure. It would be to someone with your frame of reference.


whether something is capitalized or not doesn't determine if something is real.
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 04:47 pm
@Volunteer,
Fatal_Freedoms;46851 wrote:
:lightbulb:


Quote:
Huh? That is very poorly phrased, forgive me for not understanding the point you are trying to make.


Try harder. Did you ever read or have read to you The Little Engine That Could?

Quote:
The fallacy of your conclusion is that you've made the assumption that a person would know if they were wrong, and that is certainly not the case. It is possible for someone to believe something that they think is true when it is actually false! People may die for a belief that they think is true but in reality it is false!


Could this be true of atheists/anti-theists?

Quote:
The bible makes self-references, this is an academic "no-no"!


The Bible was not written in a classroom. The Bible is not politically correct. Political correctness was a concept created by totalitarian regimes.

Quote:
Like the discovery of talking snakes and a global flood? I have asked for these discoveries and have yet to see any! The Bible says that bats are birds, but anyone with a 6th grade education can tell you otherwise.


When you communicate, do you always do it without using allusions or allegories?

Quote:
You didn't say 'most christians' you just said 'christians' don't coerce people into believing, which is not true as i have just demonstrated.


No, I said, “A bad apple can spoil the whole basket. This is one of the tactics of the devil, to deceive believers into the idea they can use Satan’s tricks or coerce people into belief in God. The essence of God’s Word is that man must be free to choose. Freedom in this sense means no coercion.”

Quote:
Hitler definitely wasn't an atheist he made many many statements about working for god....and stalin was an atheist but he was not motivated by atheism, in-fact the personallity cult of Stalin is very dogmatic, specificly you are talking about communist genocide not atheist, the truth is NO Democratic atheist-dominated nation EVER commited genocide, current nations with high proportions of atheists in the population are doing better in the way of education and have much lower crime rates than in the US.


Someone saying they are a Christian doesn’t make it so. Your slip with asserting that Thor and Zeus are gods indicates you believe there is such a thing as a god. That doesn’t match your stated belief that you don’t believe in gods or God.

Name three atheist/anti-theist dominated nations with democratic or true representative governments.

Quote:
I'm pro-life....don't make too many assumptions about my political beliefs!


Wu…whooooo!!!

Quote:
Whos says i'm still exploring? I'm an about as atheistic as they come...i use debate to further educate myself, I don't learn about other religions because i am considering them.


I say you are based on your stated desire to explore and continue poking at things you say you don’t believe in., If you truly don’t believe, then you are wasting precious minutes of your biological life in arguing over something you don’t believe in. That sounds like you are either conflicted about your belief, you are lying (probably to yourself), or you are seeking truth because you haven’t yet found it.

Quote:
atheism technically isn't a belief, it's lack of belief (in a god).


Sure it is, uh huh, I really, really believe you.

Quote:
That's too bad, one should consistantly look for the truth whether it corrosponds or contradicts current belief. Believing you have the absolute truth and there is no possibility of being wrong is the very epitimy of closed-mindedness.


What is the point in practice bleeding?

Quote:
talking with people of different beliefs will educate you (and me).


Can you say seeker?

Quote:
I'm not sure, i think it's black, i could be wrong.


Look it up.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 06:07 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;46888 wrote:
Try harder. Did you ever read or have read to you The Little Engine That Could?

don't belittle me!



Could this be true of atheists/anti-theists?

This is true of everyone!



Political correctness was a concept created by totalitarian regimes.

umm....okay...whatever you say...:wtf:

When you communicate, do you always do it without using allusions or allegories?

nice dodge, why don't you answer the question?whether satan convinced them to do it or not that doesn't change the fact, christians have coerced people into believing.No, i'm am simply using your own arguments against you. I use your same arguments but replace your god with pagan gods so you can see how invalid such an argument is!

Name three atheist/anti-theist dominated nations with democratic or true representative governments.

Norway, Sweden, and the UK are three most prominent nations with an unusually high proportion of atheists!It sounds like you enjoy believing that i am still searching, but it simply isn't true, because i understand that only the fool is willfully ignorant. I don't think i am wasting my time learning about religions, in fact it makes my arguments for atheism much better, and i understand how the theists think, which further cements me into atheism.

Sure it is, uh huh, I really, really believe you.

i detect some sarcasm, hey don't take my word for it look in the dictionary for atheism!

What is the point in practice bleeding?

what are you talking about?





:lightbulb:
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 06:37 pm
@Volunteer,
Fatal_Freedoms;46892 wrote:
:lightbulb:


Quote:
don't belittle me!


I’m not.

When you communicate, do you always do it without using allusions or allegories?

Quote:
nice dodge, why don't you answer the question?


No dodge, just an indirect answer.

No, I said, “A bad apple can spoil the whole basket. This is one of the tactics of the devil, to deceive believers into the idea they can use Satan’s tricks or coerce people into belief in God. The essence of God’s Word is that man must be free to choose. Freedom in this sense means no coercion.”

Quote:
whether satan convinced them to do it or not that doesn't change the fact, christians have coerced people into believing.


You are creating your own point and ignoring mine. By the way, if you are an atheist, you don’t believe in Satan either. Why refer to him as though you do?


Quote:
No, i'm am simply using your own arguments against you. I use your same arguments but replace your god with pagan gods so you can see how invalid such an argument is!


Apples and oranges.

Quote:
Norway, Sweden, and the UK are three most prominent nations with an unusually high proportion of atheists!


Your point was atheist dominated democratic countries. My question asked you to name three countries that are democratic and dominated by atheists. You qualified your answer by saying the nations you name have “an unusually high proportion” of atheists. If we’re being precise, what exactly do you mean by “unusually high?”

Quote:
It sounds like you enjoy believing that i am still searching, but it simply isn't true, because i understand that only the fool is willfully ignorant. I don't think i am wasting my time learning about religions, in fact it makes my arguments for atheism much better, and i understand how the theists think, which further cements me into atheism.


Have you read the Bible with an open mind, or did you form a pre-judgement?




What is the point in practice bleeding?

Quote:
what are you talking about?


Practice bleeding is when you cut yourself, knowing you will bleed, but you do it anyway. The only reason you would do that unless you are a masochist is to practice bleeding. There is no need to practice bleeding because the same thing happens every time unless you run out of blood. Again, what is the point?
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 07:18 pm
@Volunteer,
Volly.....keep pummelling them.
0 Replies
 
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Nov, 2007 07:32 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;46898 wrote:
Noi know what you said, you reply didn't answer my question!You were the one to mention not me, I was simply arguing on "your terms"...

Apples and oranges.

and?by unusually high i mean: "much higher than the normal or average amount"

Have you read the Bible with an open mind, or did you form a pre-judgement?

Have your read "The God delusion" with an open mind, or did you form a pre-judgement?

Practice bleeding is when you cut yourself, knowing you will bleed, but you do it anyway. The only reason you would do that unless you are a masochist is to practice bleeding. There is no need to practice bleeding because the same thing happens every time unless you run out of blood. Again, what is the point?

Are you being metaphoric or literal? I certainly don't cut myself, and i also don't see the relevency...so i assume you are being metaphoric, but what exactly are you relating "Bleeding" to?



:lightbulb:
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 05:13 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;46908 wrote:
:lightbulb:


Your point was atheist dominated democratic countries. My question asked you to name three countries that are democratic and dominated by atheists. You qualified your answer by saying the nations you name have “an unusually high proportion” of atheists. If we’re being precise, what exactly do you mean by “unusually high?”

Quote:
by unusually high i mean: "much higher than the normal or average amount"


That is not equivalent to dominated by.

Have you read the Bible with an open mind, or did you form a pre-judgement?

Quote:
Have your read "The God delusion" with an open mind, or did you form a pre-judgement?


I formed a pre-judgement. As I said before. I have no need or desire to practice bleeding. You are the person who is asking questions about my beliefs. I have no wish to explore yours. I am old enough and have explored enough to know what is true and good and what is not.

If you want answers about Judaism or Christianity, read The Book that is the Source. Otherwise you are just arguing to argue and that's a pointless occupation.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 07:22 pm
@Volunteer,
Hit'm hard, Volly. Hit'm.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 07:52 pm
@Volunteer,
Volunteer;46981 wrote:


That is not equivalent to dominated by.


Estonia is the only nation i know that has an atheist majority but just barely at 53%, but Estonia is a very progressive country, it is ranked as #1 in economic and social liberty and is ranked as the 11th nation with the most freedom of press.


Quote:

I formed a pre-judgement (about the God Delusion).


you sound like a hypocrite...

Quote:
As I said before. I have no need or desire to practice bleeding. You are the person who is asking questions about my beliefs. I have no wish to explore yours. I am old enough and have explored enough to know what is true and good and what is not.

If you want answers about Judaism or Christianity, read The Book that is the Source. Otherwise you are just arguing to argue and that's a pointless occupation.


I was raised a christian i know what christians believe, i am much more interested in why they believe!
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 07:54 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;46993 wrote:
Hit'm hard, Volly. Hit'm.


Yeah, you just stand on the side-lines and cheer and let Volly do all the work......like a good cheerleader! Very Happy
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 09:49 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47005 wrote:
Yeah, you just stand on the side-lines and cheer and let Volly do all the work......like a good cheerleader! Very Happy


He doesn't need any help. He's smoke'n you.:burnout:
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 05:46 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;47018 wrote:
He doesn't need any help. He's smoke'n you.:burnout:


You just don't want to help volly because you are incapable of getting into a serious debate with these things we call "facts"....:eek:
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 06:11 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47057 wrote:
You just don't want to help volly because you are incapable of getting into a serious debate with these things we call "facts"....:eek:


Yeah..........right. Good recovery. Lemme eat another handful of nuts, drinking a cold one, while he stomps you some more.:orly::elefant::whipping:
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 08:31 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;47060 wrote:
Yeah..........right. Good recovery. Lemme eat another handful of nuts, drinking a cold one, while he stomps you some more.:orly::elefant::whipping:


you do that....Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 06:45 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47004 wrote:


Quote:
you sound like a hypocrite...

Open your ears a bit more or look in Johari's window.


Quote:
I was raised a christian i know what christians believe, i am much more interested in why they believe!


If you were raised as a christian, that upbringing included learning from the Bible what God says about you and our world, and you continue to blaspheme and spew the spirit of the anti-christ without repentance, then you have no excuse and no redemption. Read the Bible with adult eyes and you'll see what I mean. It states this explicitly.

Just as there is a difference between saying you are a christian and actually being one, there is also a difference between "being raised as a christian" and actually reading or learning from the source documentation of our beliefs, the Bible, God's Word. Most churches drift off course by becoming enamored of their own man made rituals. They loose sight of the Scripture and what It actually says. If you grew up in a family that went to a church like this then you did not have the benefit of "knowing what christians believe" You only learned the form, not the function or the reason for the form. This is indicated by your statement that you are more interested in why christians believe. If you were actually raised as a christian, being given the knowledge that is the birth right of christians, then you would already know why.
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 06:51 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Quote:
you sound like a hypocrite...


I hope you don't do this in school. If you portray something as a quote, you can't change the word(s) of the person you are quoting. You really should combine quotes into one and portray it as the whole quote either. If you do it isn't a quote. Being straight forward about forming a pre-judgement and the fact I have no intention of reading someone's blasphemy is not being a hypocrite. It is as you say, being true to myself and my beliefs.
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 06:53 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;47057 wrote:
You just don't want to help volly because you are incapable of getting into a serious debate with these things we call "facts"....:eek:


Thanks for acknowledging that I am arguing using facts.
0 Replies
 
Volunteer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 06:58 am
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;46518 wrote:
:lightbulb:


Quote:
There is no physical evidence or proof that shows that the universe was created by a god especially the specific god you believe in!


Why especially? This sounds like you were hurt by a parent or other adult who believes in God or purports to believe in God and that you are now angry at not just the adult, but also at God.


Why do you take a breath? I mean physically/physiologically, not metaphysically. In the same vein, (no puin intended) why can you move your arm or why does your heart pump blood?

Quote:
Answer= My own body's will to live!


That is quite a metaphysical answer for such a hard headed atheist. I was asking about the mechanics not the metaphysics.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.27 seconds on 03/10/2025 at 09:20:01