@Volunteer,
Okay, although I think it's not necessary to expand on that point, I'm not you, so... Basically, yes, the people elect people who they agree with, of course, if it is possible. There are many people who would agree with the Bible Party in places like the South, so it could become a reality in the distnt future that someone from this or a similar group is elected, but that's an entirely different debate. Anyway, should the majority decide to elect someon who holds
their values, this person, should hold office, whether those values are of a religious nature or not. That's democracy, the ideas of the majority must be represented over those of the minorities, but the minorities should be represented too, and be treated fairly and equally. Though the rules of the Constitution were held highly by our founding fathers, they probably held higher the idea of overthrowing a government when it no longer serves most of it's people well, even the system that they created. The majority of the people should have majority representation simply because it is fair, so long as they uphold the ideas of freedom and equality.
The Bible Party can do this. If by some miracle, they get the majority of people to join them, they should be able to reflect their views and the views of the people, which simply happen to be influenced by their religious beliefs as are the views of almost everyone, on the policy that they make, as long as they don't establish an official religion.
