Bible Party of the USA

one

I'm not a liberal, I'm a Moderate Republican, who supports the Iraq war, I even voted for Bush twice. Just because you have to look to your left to see me doesn't mean I'm liberal, you're not exactly standing on the dividing line...

two

because he was against influence by religion is state affairs, he affirms this by his own words. I'm sorry if that isn't convenient to you and your cause but if he was here today he would oppose The Bible Party of the USA. If the founding fathers wanted that kind of government that's what they would have forged. But even John Adam's, a puritan, didn't want this. Even if both of them were very much Christian in their own lives.

It is not uncommon for men to seek the council of God in such difficult times, even if the task being done is not solely for religious reasons...

let me ask you something, why do you ignore every quote, document, known fact but which that supports your position

the truth is a puzzle where every piece fits

OK sorry for calling you a liberal. What's the difference between a moderate republican and a liberal?

I'm not a liberal, I'm a Moderate Republican, ..

If you quack like a duck, you just might be a duck. If it takes a close look to see if you are a duck, or not, then something is wrong.

Well I support the war, even if we're there another 5 years, there's a start.

I am personally Pro-Life, but I do not think that it's up to me to push my ethics on others, even if Abortion is disgusting, so I'm Pro-Choice politically. If we really want to stop abortion it has to be done in the classroom, not the courtroom.

I'm anti gun control, I even think that assault rifles with burst capability should be legalized to persons over the age of 25 with clean records who can pass a certification.

I'm also super pro death penalty, I think even Texas isn't aggressive enough on this. And I don't believe felons need rehab, they need punishment for their crimes and then the option of rehab once there debt's paid.

I'm in favor of complete separation of Church and state, but that's all religion, not just Christianity. When Kansas put foot baths in their airport to accommodate Muslims it was me who posted the thread about how wrong it was. I'm not Anti-Religion, but faith is a personal matter and it should remain that way so that nobody feels like a second class citizen.

And lastly I'm pro stem cell research, as the current plan opposed by Bush would only use stem cells from aborted fetuses, and it could help people, it's simply making the best out of a bad situation.

no you've been brainwashed by your church enough to not accept anyone who disagrees with you.

I am personally Pro-Life, but I do not think that it's up to me to push my ethics on others, even if Abortion is disgusting, so I'm Pro-Choice politically. If we really want to stop abortion it has to be done in the classroom, not the courtroom.

I'm anti gun control, I even think that assault rifles with burst capability should be legalized to persons over the age of 25 with clean records who can pass a certification.

I'm in favor of complete separation of Church and state, but that's all religion, not just Christianity. When Kansas put foot baths in their airport to accommodate Muslims it was me who posted the thread about how wrong it was. I'm not Anti-Religion, but faith is a personal matter and it should remain that way so that nobody feels like a second class citizen.

And lastly I'm pro stem cell research, as the current plan opposed by Bush would only use stem cells from aborted fetuses, and it could help people, it's simply making the best out of a bad situation.

Are you a woman? If you don't want top force your views on others, how can you be Pro-life if you are not a woman? Doesn't your stance require you to be female to voice an opinion on abortion?

If not your church then your Religion

The Totalitarianism of your politics is apparent, you would bend the entire nation to the will of your view of God. Making you no different then the theologies we combat in the Middle East. That fact that you claim "my religion is the right one" changes nothing, Bin Laden would claim that as well.

The country and her politics are about people with differences of opinion finding the common ground and acting, it is not about the "I'm right, your evil" mentality that you display.

Why 25? Why only burst capability? Why not full auto?

I'm male, and if I was ever expecting and the mother wanted to terminate the child I would release her from all parental repsponisbility and pay for the bill in full if she would give birth. If she wanted to still abort I would lawyer up and put a cease and desist on her and sue for the rights of my unborn child.

But the fact remains that the majority of America favors abortion to be legal in a least some instances, and American law must reflect the will of the people. That's why I said that it must be done in the classrom, not the courtroom.

And from my military training I can tell you unequivically that fully auto is a waste of bullets

Mil training? If a weapon has full auto and the operator is proficient, the operator can restrict firing to three or six round bursts as the need arises. This type of burst can be very accurate with sufficient practice. If more accuirate aimed fire is required for a specific application, use the semi-auto selector and squueeze off the rounds as you acquire each target. If in a breaking contact or ambush situation, burst restricted fire can get you or your team killed. You need full auto.

Now, why would you need that capability in a civil society?

Where are you getting your statistics?

unfortunatly mordern small arms fire techniques agree with me, not you

the only reason to have fully auto would be to fire into a large groud of target, I would have to think what a 60-gun would have done at VT