25
   

Young folk singer dead after attack by coyotes in Nova Scotia park

 
 
Always Eleven to him
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 08:35 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Will u agree that if your dog is fighting for his life and yours,
against a pack of coyotes, u owe it to him to support him with your own defensive firepower ?


I would try to save my dogs from anything that proved a danger to them. If I had a weapon with me, I would use it to defend my dogs.

Heck, I've even defended my dogs against stray cats and other wildlife. But I didn't use a gun to do it. Of course, what I got for my troubles was a series of rabies shots when a stray cat bit me. No good deed goes unpunished, but I'm happy to say that except for some scratches and a few small bites, the dogs are fine, and I'm vaccinated against rabies. I am disappointed, though, that I didn't get a little medallion to wear around my neck like my dogs have.

But as I noted earlier, I don't carry weapons with me everywhere I go. I take the weapon only when I'm going to a shooting range.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 08:36 am
@Always Eleven to him,
Always Eleven to him wrote:

Quote:
as long as he thinks he can go around having the right to shoot at anything he thinks is a danger for him.


I agree, saab.

Quote:
Use of force is justified when a person reasonably believes that it is necessary for the defense of oneself or another against the immediate use of unlawful force. However, a person must use no more force than appears reasonably necessary in the circumstances.

Force likely to cause death or great bodily harm is justified in self-defense only if a person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm.

Legal Definition of Self-Defense Defense, http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d030.htm (last visited Nov. 1, 2009) (emphasis added).

Okay, self defense applies only to shooting other people, not animals.

What concerns me about some of the posts here is that the posters' attitutes might carry over into the shooting-human-beings realm. And that's when the jury will decide if the person claiming self defense reasonably believed deadly force was necessary.

But at that point (the trial) it's too late; a human life has already been taken, or the human has been injured.
U said that u "agree" 11,
but the fellow with whom u agree
falsely implied that I had indicated desires or intentions or
"the right" to kill peaceful animals; that 's a lie.

I only indicated that Taylor shoud have counterattacked
the coyotes, either from when thay charged her,
or
from when thay were biting her (fatally) all over her body.

The quoted allegation against me that:
". . . he thinks he can go around having the right to shoot at anything
he thinks is a danger for him" is a lie, created or hallucinated by Saab.


Nowhere in the thread, has ANYONE, certainly not ME,
asserted that if someone "thinks" that an animal is dangerous
then he shoud kill him.

I never suggested a pre-emptive attack.
A counterattack shoud begin after the primary attack has begun.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 08:56 am
@Always Eleven to him,
Always Eleven to him wrote:

Quote:
Will u agree that if your dog is fighting for his life and yours,
against a pack of coyotes, u owe it to him to support him with your own defensive firepower ?


I would try to save my dogs from anything that proved a danger to them. If I had a weapon with me, I would use it to defend my dogs.

Heck, I've even defended my dogs against stray cats and other wildlife. But I didn't use a gun to do it. Of course, what I got for my troubles was a series of rabies shots when a stray cat bit me. No good deed goes unpunished, but I'm happy to say that except for some scratches and a few small bites, the dogs are fine, and I'm vaccinated against rabies. I am disappointed, though, that I didn't get a little medallion to wear around my neck like my dogs have.

But as I noted earlier, I don't carry weapons with me everywhere I go.

I take the weapon only when I'm going to a shooting range.
With all respect: surely the engineers who designed your .22 pistol
(how many rounds ?) did not intend it to be used as a weapon.
Its a target pistol. For self-defense, even a .38 is too light.

Case in point: in the 1960s, a deranged bum charged a NYC Police Officer,
with a broken whiskey bottle. Police Officer shot him in the chest
6 times with a .38 revolver. Bum perishes from his wounds,
but before he does, he jams said fx bottle into officer 's throat,
inflicting fatal injury. The moral of the story is:
u need to have adequate firepower, if u are going to bet your life on it.





David
0 Replies
 
saab
 
  2  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 09:23 am
@OmSigDAVID,
You always point out if s/he had had a gun this or that would not have happened.
That certainly sounds as if you think shooting at any time is ok.

This poor young woman was screaming for help. That did not scare these very accresive coyotes away.
If coyotes go for your throat how do you at the same time try to fight them off and get your gun?
If coyotes go for your legs and thighs and you fall flat on your stomach how do you get at your gun?
If they go for your arms how do you get your gun?
parados
 
  3  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 10:44 am
Having read this thread I can only say one thing.

David reminds me of a lunatic on the streets of NYC. He is always happy and willing to use a dead body as a soap box to climb up on and rant.
Merry Andrew
 
  2  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 10:50 am
@parados,
Quote:
David reminds me of a lunatic on the streets of NYC.


You have just described dear ole David to a T.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 10:50 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Quote:
You also seem to forget that much of the world does not come under your precious 2nd amendment and could give a rats ass to it.
Richard, for all I care, every Canadian can follow in the footsteps of Ms. Taylor Mitchel. Go ahead: do the same thing. Feed yourselves, UNARMED, into the mouths of Canadian wildlife and come out the other end.

http://i33.tinypic.com/f0qkap.jpg

Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 10:50 am
@saab,
saab wrote:

You always point out if s/he had had a gun this or that would not have happened.
That certainly sounds as if you think shooting at any time is ok.

Not if you use normal English reading comprehension skills.

Quote:
This poor young woman was screaming for help. That did not scare these very accresive coyotes away.

Yes. That would tend to indicate that screaming was an ineffective defensive weapon in that situation.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  3  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 11:57 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Intrepid wrote:
Quote:

Most other countries have also not had a civil war or a revolution so maybe your paranoia is justified.


David wrote:

Quote:
Quote:
Yeah, u Canadians have always been too yellow-bellied to stand up against the English.



We ARE the British, you moron.


Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:00 pm
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

David's skill, or lack of, with any weapon is a mute point to this thread. The thread is not about David even though he seems to be making it such.

A cow is a domestic animal. A rottweiller is a dog that still has the wild instinct inbred. You have not made any points on this one.


No. You are completely wrong about this and pretty much everything else in this thread. Rotties have been domestic since the Romans used used the for herding cattle. There is no wild instinct in the breed, merely poor trainers and those that train them to be mean.

And it's not a "moot" point.


No, you are completely wrong. There is a wild instinct in every animal.

As for me being wrong about everything else on this thread...I challenge you to provide proof of said inaccuracies. If you can.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:05 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

Quote:
David,

Perhaps we could setup an experiment.
It woud be fun,
but we both know that it is not going to happen.
I re-iterate AGAIN that I am not a hunter. I do not wish to become a hunter.



Quote:
You arm yourself with the pistol of your choice
and we will put you in the woods with two 60 pound predatory coyotes.
1. I do not trust pistols; thay jam too much.
If any handgun, I 'd use my .44 magnum Ruger SuperBlackhawk revolver,
backed with my .44 special Taurus Model 445 revolver.


2. Even if I were willing, it is not likely that Canadian customs
woud let me into your country with a gun; (I suspect -- I don 't know that for a fact).
Maybe thay DO let in hunters.

I am not afraid of coyotes, but it is very likely that Canada
has more serious predators than them, e.g., cougars n bears.





Quote:
We will discuss the outcome and how you shot, maimed, killed,
scared off both coyotes over a beer afterwards.

Are you game? (no pun intented)
It kinda sounds like fun,
tho again, I have no wish to harm peaceful animals, including coyotes.
I woud not go there to avenge Taylor upon innocent coyotes
who had nothing to do with the offense.





David



You have just disputed every comment you have made in prior posts on this thread. You are not up to the suggestion and give lame excuses for this or that, but you expect a young inexperienced girl to carry a weapon and protect herself from 2 attacking coyotes.

You don't seem to remember things that you post and then make incoherent replies. At least, I no longer understand your reasoning.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:09 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

Having read this thread I can only say one thing.

David reminds me of a lunatic on the streets of NYC.
He is always happy and willing to use a dead body as a soap box to climb up on and rant.
Well, I am happy, most of the time; an optimist, by nature.
Just an optimist leading a quiet life.

Thank u for your concern, Parados.





David
Intrepid
 
  3  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:12 pm
@Ticomaya,
Ticomaya wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:
Quote:
You also seem to forget that much of the world does not come under your precious 2nd amendment and could give a rats ass to it.
Richard, for all I care, every Canadian can follow in the footsteps of Ms. Taylor Mitchel. Go ahead: do the same thing. Feed yourselves, UNARMED, into the mouths of Canadian wildlife and come out the other end.

http://i33.tinypic.com/f0qkap.jpg




Isn't that nice. The two lawyers (David & Tico) are ok with every Canadian being mauled and killed by coyotes. You are a credit to your profession and the human race.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:29 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

Quote:
David,

Perhaps we could setup an experiment.
It woud be fun,
but we both know that it is not going to happen.
I re-iterate AGAIN that I am not a hunter. I do not wish to become a hunter.



Quote:
You arm yourself with the pistol of your choice
and we will put you in the woods with two 60 pound predatory coyotes.
1. I do not trust pistols; thay jam too much.
If any handgun, I 'd use my .44 magnum Ruger SuperBlackhawk revolver,
backed with my .44 special Taurus Model 445 revolver.


2. Even if I were willing, it is not likely that Canadian customs
woud let me into your country with a gun; (I suspect -- I don 't know that for a fact).
Maybe thay DO let in hunters.

I am not afraid of coyotes, but it is very likely that Canada
has more serious predators than them, e.g., cougars n bears.





Quote:
We will discuss the outcome and how you shot, maimed, killed,
scared off both coyotes over a beer afterwards.

Are you game? (no pun intented)
It kinda sounds like fun,
tho again, I have no wish to harm peaceful animals, including coyotes.
I woud not go there to avenge Taylor upon innocent coyotes
who had nothing to do with the offense.





David



Quote:
You have just disputed every comment you have made in prior posts on this thread.
I deny that, Richard.
Your allegation is a lot of nonsense.
I challenge u to show any such "disputed" comment
.



Quote:
You are not up to the suggestion and give lame excuses for this
or that, but you expect a young inexperienced girl to carry a
weapon and protect herself from 2 attacking coyotes.
Equipping oneself properly is an OBVIOUS thing to do.
Failure to do so cost her life. I earnestly wish that had not happened,
and that she HAD been well equipped,
or had a well equipped bodyguard.




Quote:
You don't seem to remember things that you post and then make incoherent replies.
WHAT things ??

Quote:
At least, I no longer understand your reasoning.
U were never very good at understanding reasoning, Richard.
saab
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:40 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Please answer my question in case she had had a gun


If coyotes go for your throat how do you at the same time try to fight them off and get your gun?
If coyotes go for your legs and thighs and you fall flat on your stomach how do you get at your gun?
If they go for your arms how do you get your gun?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:50 pm

I am put in mind of an account by the late Gene Shepard,
who told of being invited by an old Army pal to visit him at his home
in the woods of the great North West of America. When Gene arrived,
his pal was away. He was welcomed by his wife and his 12 year old son,
who invited him to go fishing at a good hole that he knew. He agreed.
The boy came out of their house with his fishing equipment,
threw a 1911 Colt .45 automatic into their Jeep, and drove away with Gene.

Upon their return, the boy 's mother was agitated, demanding of him:
"Did u take your father 's .45 pistol with u when u went out?"
Gene tells us us that he sheepishly looked down and admitted it,
whereupon his distraught mother shouted:
"How many times must I TELL U? U NEVER go out there with anything less than a .30-30 !!!





David
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:54 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
dave, you make me wonder how it is that the native peoples managed to survive in this land.

prior to being exterminated by white guys with guns, I mean...
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 12:58 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:
Quote:
You also seem to forget that much of the world does not come under your precious 2nd amendment and could give a rats ass to it.
Richard, for all I care, every Canadian can follow in the footsteps of Ms. Taylor Mitchel. Go ahead: do the same thing. Feed yourselves, UNARMED, into the mouths of Canadian wildlife and come out the other end.

http://i33.tinypic.com/f0qkap.jpg




Isn't that nice. The two lawyers (David & Tico) are ok with every Canadian
being mauled and killed by coyotes. You are a credit to your profession and the human race.
I can 't speak for Tico, but I am not admitted to practice in Canadia.

If u people wanna go around helpless, without rights and without guns,
then u will live (and die) with the consequences.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 01:00 pm
@Rockhead,
Rockhead wrote:

dave, you make me wonder how it is that the native peoples managed to survive in this land.

prior to being exterminated by white guys with guns, I mean...
Tomahawks?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Nov, 2009 01:13 pm
The inanity of this thread grows more inane and the insanity more insane with each new post. Mind-boggling.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/04/2025 at 03:49:40