25
   

Young folk singer dead after attack by coyotes in Nova Scotia park

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:20 pm
@Ticomaya,
Ticomaya wrote:

The best bet is to have a dog and a gun.
Very true; its a good way to live too.

(The dog may need u to support him with the gun.)





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:25 pm
@Merry Andrew,
Merry Andrew wrote:

I've seen a pack of coyotes bring down a full grown doe, slightly larger than any dog I've ever seen.
I 'm pretty sure that she was an UNARMED full grown doe.
Intrepid
 
  3  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:38 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

Ceili wrote:
A dog would have warned her.


definitely a good chance of this.

Guns aren't particularly good early warning systems.


It could also have given her the opportunity to remove herself from the area of the coyotes.

I would rather have a good dog than a gun any day. Can't snuggle into a warm gun in the cold woods to keep you warm. You can with your dog.

There were two coyotes sighted at the back of some properties here on the mountain yesterday. They were said to be not aggressive but not particularly afraid of humans in the area either.

Coyotes and other animals are meant to live in the wild. It is man that invades their territory. It is because of man that animals now try to occupy ours.

The young lady was certainly not, in any way, to blame for her dilemma and I am appalled at the posts that try to portray her as such.
Intrepid
 
  3  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:39 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
I am just curious as to how this thread suddenly changed to a topic of guns and bears.
djjd62
 
  3  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:41 pm
@Intrepid,
david showed up
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:43 pm
@Ceili,
Ceili wrote:

She was most probably wearing an iPod or the like.
Even if she'd had a gun, the element of surprise would have been greater.
A dog would have warned her.
In my opinion, what almost certainly happened is that
she saw them and felt threatened. Not knowing any better:
she turned her back on them: not a good idea.

Then, I very strongly suspect:
she activated their hardwired,
centuries and millenia old predatory instinct reflex, by running.
A biped cannot outrun a quadrupedal predator.

The coyotes coud not resist their built-in instinct
to chase fleeing prey, in whom thay sensed fear.

The best thing that she coud have done was to attack them.
Throw rocks if thay were best weapons she had; scare them away.

Thay 'd have fled an attacking human who dominates the situation.
It is not likely that she knew this.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:46 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

I am just curious as to how this thread suddenly changed to a topic of guns and bears.
The victim got killed because of being ill-equipped.
It behooves future victims to be better equipped.

Do u understand now ?





David
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:46 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
FINALLY! A reply from you that does not include guns!
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:47 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
if i live until tomorrow i will never understand your obsession with guns
Intrepid
 
  3  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:48 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

I am just curious as to how this thread suddenly changed to a topic of guns and bears.
The victim got killed because of being ill-equipped.
It behooves future victims to be better equipped.

Do u understand now ?





David


She did not get killed because of being ill-equpped. She got killed because she was attacked by two out of control coyotes. Even if she had one of your precious guns, it is not likely that she would have been able to kill both animals and still lived.

Do U understand now?
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:50 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

ehBeth wrote:

Ceili wrote:
A dog would have warned her.


definitely a good chance of this.

Guns aren't particularly good early warning systems.


Quote:
It could also have given her the opportunity to remove herself from the area of the coyotes.

I would rather have a good dog than a gun any day.
If your loyal dog is defending u from another animal, out of decency,
u shoud support him with your gun, not stand there idly.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 04:55 pm
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:

if i live until tomorrow i will never understand your obsession with guns
I have wondered about that, myself.
I have had that since the age of 3, that I can remember; maybe earlier that I can 't.
My eyes locked onto police officers' revolvers.
My thawts locked onto them too.

Since the age of 8, I have had a fairly decent gun collection.





David
0 Replies
 
Always Eleven to him
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 05:43 pm
First, I’m coming in on the “let’s-get-our-facts-right-please-read-the-whole-thread-before-you-comment" side.”

Kuvasz wrote:

Quote:
It's why I hike with three 100-pound Kuvasz. Mine have killed several coyotes on my properties in Georgia and North Carolina, and while my oldest and now-deceased Aja was only 18 months old, she ripped out the throat of a big Rottweiler that attacked me in a park in Virginia. I'd have been dog food were it not for my Aja coming to my rescue. I wish the woman would have had a dog by her side. Likely, it would have saved her life.


Then Ticomaya wrote:

Quote:
So what's the deal with dog nuts? They act as if a dog is the solution to everything. Dog fetish, is what it is.

If I'm being attacked by an animal, everything else being equal, I would much rather have a loaded gun in my hand than a dog at my side.


To which Kuvasz responded:

Quote:
Coyotes shy away from domestic dogs of equal or near equal size. Coyotes don't know if you are carrying a pistol before an attack, so carrying a weapon is not a deterrent to a coyote attack, only a defense while one occurs. They do recognize a predator and stay away from people with large dogs. That comes from personal experience in dealing with and tracking coyotes over the past three decades. Sensible people would rather avoid an attack by a wild animal than fought off one.


To which Ticomaya responded:

Quote:
Your assertion that a dog would have prevented this attack is nothing more than conjecture on your part. More than likely since these coyotes were desperate enough to attack a human, they would have attacked the dog as well.


If, Ticomayo, you had read Kuvasz’s first post, you would have seen that Kuvasz did have experience with dogs preventing coyote and Rottweiler attacks, both of which are pretty scary in my book.

Second, I’m coming in on the “I’d-rather-have-a-dog-than-a-gun-when-I’m-hiking-in-the- woods” side.

Kuvasz wrote:

Quote:
Coyotes don't know if you are carrying a pistol before an attack, so carrying a weapon is not a deterrent to a coyote attack, only a defense while one occurs.


Absolutely right, Kuvasz. And (IM not-so HO) it's not particularly a good defense, at that.

I don't know about David or Ticomaya, but when faced with two 60-lb coyotes coming at me, I don't think I could get that gun out, steady my hand, and take the two shots (one at each) that David assumes would have killed the coyotes or warded off the attack. And I qualified as "Sharpshooter" when I completed the police academy's firearms training many years ago.

Thank you, NickFun for
Quote:
Let's not blame the victim for this one.


Thank you, EhBeth, Ceili, and Intrepid for bringing more sense to the discussion:

Quote:
I would rather have a good dog than a gun any day. Can't snuggle into a warm gun in the cold woods to keep you warm. You can with your dog.
. . . .

Coyotes and other animals are meant to live in the wild. It is man that invades their territory. It is because of man that animals now try to occupy ours.

The young lady was certainly not, in any way, to blame for her dilemma and I am appalled at the posts that try to portray her as such.


And last, but not least, in the "let's-be-fair-to-OmSigDAVID" category:

David wrote:

Quote:
The coyotes coud not resist their built-in instinct
to chase fleeing prey, in whom thay sensed fear.

The best thing that she coud have done was to attack them.
Throw rocks if thay were best weapons she had; scare them away.

Thay 'd have fled an attacking human who dominates the situation.
It is not likely that she knew this.


That's the most sensible suggestion I've read from David in this thread. If the human shows no fear in the face of an attack by an animal, and if the human acts as the aggressor instead, chances are the animals will flee.

A friend of mine once told me a story about how an aggressive, snarling dog rushed at him one evening while he was walking in a quiet, suburban neighborhood. He acted the aggressor, shouting, waving his arms, and even growling and barking at the dog. The dog turned tail and ran.

Yes, anecdotal evidence, but evidence nonetheless.

Always,
11
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 05:51 pm
@Always Eleven to him,
This is the only post of yours that I have read, but I find that you bring an open and reasonable air to the thread, and probably, to the forum.

Welcome.
roger
 
  2  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 05:55 pm
I don't know where you people are finding these sixty pound coyotes. That's a big, and I do mean big coyote. I don't know the record, but 45 pounds is pretty good sized.
joefromchicago
 
  2  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 05:56 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

This is the only post of yours that I have read, but I find that you bring an open and reasonable air to the thread, and probably, to the forum.

Must be lost.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 06:50 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:

I don't know where you people are finding these sixty pound coyotes. That's a big, and I do mean big coyote. I don't know the record, but 45 pounds is pretty good sized.


Coyotes in Prince Edward Island range in size from 25 to 50 lbs, an average of about 15-20% larger than it's western cousins.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 09:06 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Merry Andrew wrote:

I've seen a pack of coyotes bring down a full grown doe, slightly larger than any dog I've ever seen.
I 'm pretty sure that she was an UNARMED full grown doe.


Far as I know, David, she wasn't packin'. But she was trying to sprint across an ice-covered pond, slippery as hell, which enabled the pack of coyotes to catch up with her because her hooves went skidding around on the ice. My point is that a cooperative band of the canine beasts can bring down some fair sized critters, ergo a dog is not immune to an attack.

Now, most civilian handguns have magazine capacities of no more than eight or nine rounds, only six with most wheel-guns. Packs of coyotes usually attack in far greater numbers; there's strength in numbers. Moral: never go walking in the woods alone, with or without a firearm.
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Oct, 2009 10:11 pm
@Always Eleven to him,
Always Eleven to him wrote:
If, Ticomayo, you had read Kuvasz’s first post, you would have seen that Kuvasz did have experience with dogs preventing coyote and Rottweiler attacks, both of which are pretty scary in my book.

Your point is what, exactly?

But actually, if you re-read the post you quoted, I don't see where he said he had experience with dogs preventing coyote attacks. (Unless you think killing coyotes equates to preventing attacks. In which case I'd submit that a man with a gun can prevent many more attacks in a much more efficient manner.)

So it seems it is you who needs to get his facts straight.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 12:00 am
@Always Eleven to him,
Let me address the concept of "blaming" the victim.
I don 't do that.
When I have posted concerning predatory acts,
I have, always, ALWAYS, done so from a pro-victim point-of-vu.

When I read of Taylor 's misfortune, my response was sympathy
and good will for her, and wishing that she remained INTACT,
in perfect health. I wish that she had been better prepared
to confront this situation, so that she 'd prevail.

In all of these cases, I wish that the victim had been equipped
to come out on top of these conflicts. Every predatory event
is a contest of power; thay always will be. We rose to the top
of the food chain and we walked on the Moon because of
our logical use of the correct tool for each job.

That includes personal defense and self-preservation
.






Always Eleven to him wrote:

First, I’m coming in on the “let’s-get-our-facts-right-please-read-the-whole-thread-before-you-comment" side.”

Kuvasz wrote:

[quote] It's why I hike with three 100-pound Kuvasz. Mine have killed several coyotes on my properties in Georgia and North Carolina, and while my oldest and now-deceased Aja was only 18 months old, she ripped out the throat of a big Rottweiler that attacked me in a park in Virginia. I'd have been dog food were it not for my Aja coming to my rescue. I wish the woman would have had a dog by her side. Likely, it would have saved her life.


Then Ticomaya wrote:

Quote:
So what's the deal with dog nuts? They act as if a dog is the solution to everything. Dog fetish, is what it is.

If I'm being attacked by an animal, everything else being equal, I would much rather have a loaded gun in my hand than a dog at my side.


To which Kuvasz responded:

Quote:
Coyotes shy away from domestic dogs of equal or near equal size. Coyotes don't know if you are carrying a pistol before an attack, so carrying a weapon is not a deterrent to a coyote attack, only a defense while one occurs. They do recognize a predator and stay away from people with large dogs. That comes from personal experience in dealing with and tracking coyotes over the past three decades. Sensible people would rather avoid an attack by a wild animal than fought off one.


To which Ticomaya responded:

Quote:
Your assertion that a dog would have prevented this attack is nothing more than conjecture on your part. More than likely since these coyotes were desperate enough to attack a human, they would have attacked the dog as well.


11 wrote:
Quote:
If, Ticomayo, you had read Kuvasz’s first post,
you would have seen that Kuvasz did have experience
with dogs preventing coyote and Rottweiler attacks,
both of which are pretty scary in my book.
I think that we shoud note that coyotes n wolves ofen hunt in packs,
which succeed in taking down much larger animals.
This is a well known fact. However, adequate defensive firepower
has never failed to repel them, (except rabid animals)
so far as I am aware. I hope that someone will educate me,
if I am in error on this point.




11 wrote:
Quote:

Second, I’m coming in on the “I’d-rather-have-a-dog-than-a-gun-when-I’m-hiking-in-the- woods” side.
I must respect, endorse and adopt Tico 's wisdom
that a better state of preparation is a dog and a gun.
That makes sense to me.
If your dog is fighting for his life and yours,
it is a good idea to back him up, not just abandon him to his fate.











Kuvasz wrote:

Quote:

Coyotes don't know if you are carrying a pistol before an attack,
so carrying a weapon is not a deterrent to a coyote attack,
only a defense while one occurs.


11 wrote:
Quote:
Absolutely right, Kuvasz.
And (IM not-so HO) it's not particularly a good defense, at that.

I don't know about David or Ticomaya, but when faced with two
60-lb coyotes coming at me, I don't think I could get that gun out,
steady my hand, and take the two shots (one at each) that David
assumes would have killed the coyotes or warded off the attack.
And I qualified as "Sharpshooter" when I completed the police
academy's firearms training many years ago.
Guns are defensive emergency equipment; it behooves their possesser
to keep them reasonably within reach, the same as a fire extinguisher.

If the animals are not rabid, then popping off just one round
into the dirt in front of either of them
will almost certainly cause him to flee, followed by his companions.

Thank you, NickFun for
Quote:
Let's not blame the victim for this one.


Thank you, EhBeth, Ceili, and Intrepid for bringing more sense to the discussion:

Quote:
I would rather have a good dog than a gun any day. Can't snuggle into a warm gun in the cold woods to keep you warm. You can with your dog.
. . . .

Coyotes and other animals are meant to live in the wild. It is man that invades their territory. It is because of man that animals now try to occupy ours.

The young lady was certainly not, in any way, to blame for her dilemma and I am appalled at the posts that try to portray her as such.


11 wrote:
Quote:
And last, but not least, in the "let's-be-fair-to-OmSigDAVID" category:


David wrote:
Quote:
The coyotes coud not resist their built-in instinct
to chase fleeing prey, in whom thay sensed fear.

The best thing that she coud have done was to attack them.
Throw rocks if thay were best weapons she had; scare them away.

Thay 'd have fled an attacking human who dominates the situation.
It is not likely that she knew this.
11 wrote:
Quote:
That's the most sensible suggestion I've read from David in this thread.
If the human shows no fear in the face of an attack by an animal,
and if the human acts as the aggressor instead, chances are the animals will flee.

A friend of mine once told me a story about how an aggressive,
snarling dog rushed at him one evening while he was walking in a quiet,
suburban neighborhood. He acted the aggressor, shouting,
waving his arms, and even growling and barking at the dog.
The dog turned tail and ran.

Yes, anecdotal evidence, but evidence nonetheless.

Always,
11
Something a little like this happened to me maybe about 5 summers ago.
In warm weather, I walked thru a park-like area.
I saw a very large dog, looking like a German Shepherd named Boris,
sitting with a huge smile on his face, and contentment in his affect.
His head was about 4 feet up off the ground.
He was attached to a human by a leach of about 30 feet.
Boris was with his humans, as I passed in front of them,
to whom I called out that thay had a happy looking dog,
whereupon, Boris' ears perked up, his eyes locked on me,
and he slowly ambled toward me, carrying this HUGE smile.
When he arrived at a yard from me, he lifted one side of his
upper lip into a snarl, and went airborne, coming in for a landing
with his fang in my left forearm, which was uncovered, in the heat.

I looked down on him, disdainfully, as tho to say "what the hell r u doing, fool ??"
He instantly broke off the attack and sat, resuming his smile.
One of his humans approached, to whom I gave assurance
that I was not going to sue. (I did not sue.) She told me that
Boris was half Husky and half Shepherd. There were no further
hostilities from Boris (nor anyone). I think that he was in an
exposed position wherein I coud have used leverage to wrench
off his mandible, if he had not gotten peaceful again.
He discontinued his attack before I coud mount a counterattack.
It is important not to show fear. I remember my mother telling me that many decades ago, in my earliest youth.





David









































0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 06:15:18