57
   

Guns: how much longer will it take ....

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 8 Jun, 2020 10:33 am
@oralloy,
I don't see amy's lifeless body hanging from Aa tree, so you'rer just using racist yperbpole, aren't you/.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 8 Jun, 2020 10:34 am
@oralloy,
none of her call was true. That's why the manhattan DA investigates her.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 8 Jun, 2020 10:35 am
@MontereyJack,
Wrong again. Everything that she said in the call was true.

The reason why she is being investigated is because progressives are evil.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 8 Jun, 2020 10:36 am
@MontereyJack,
Falsely accusing people of racism is a crutch that progressives use because they can't defend their ideology with facts or logic.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Mon 8 Jun, 2020 11:26 am
When I was working for the Social Security visiting claimants I was told that if you’re dealing with a couple and one of them has dementia, it’s never the one who thinks they might be losing it. It’s the other one.

People who are suffering from dementia aren’t confused at all. They’re convinced they’re right, and it’s those around them who are getting everything wrong. When my wife was dying of cancer cancerous cells had infested her spinal fluid and caused her to become delusional.

She would talk about being visited by family members who did not exist, and if you tried to put her right she would go ballistic. It wasn’t worth the time and effort arguing with her, in the end it was just easier to agree with her nonsense.

Vikorr’s to and fro with Oralloy reminded me of those exchanges. An objective observer couldn’t help but concur that Vikorr had proven beyond doubt that Oralloy was racist. He is racist.

He’s also incapable of reason or understanding which is why he denies everything and confuses facts with opinion. He’s not just deluded he’s deranged, but this isn’t news.

It’s clear that Oralloy has been deranged for a very long time, at least as long as I’ve been on A2K. He rarely understands what is being discussed, pulls facts out of his arse, claims black is white and that he is some kind of supra genius instead of a very pedestrian dimwit with a limited vocabulary.

In short both MJ and Vikorr are wasting their time. We all know what Oralloy is, but he never will because he lacks understanding and reason.

Now he’s going to accuse me of lying, calling him names and he’ll repeat the ludicrous assertion that he has an IQ of 170. I won’t bother reading it because there’s no satisfaction in always being right when you’re dealing with a someone suffering from dementia.

The only person stupid enough to believe Oralloy has an IQ of 170 is Oralloy.

Btw, Jaberwocky is from Alice’s Adventures through the Looking Glass, not Wonderland.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 8 Jun, 2020 12:01 pm
@izzythepush,
Longest piece of gossip I have seen. And I have seen a lot of gossip.
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  4  
Reply Mon 8 Jun, 2020 05:36 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
Good thing for him that she called the police instead of pulling a gun.

Have you given any thought to what's going to happen the next time when the scared person is going to be afraid to call the police?

Please stop recording me...

Please stop recording me...

Please stop recording me...

...as you haven't stopped recording me, I'm going to call the cops and tell them theres an african american man threatening my life

... hello 911, there's an african american man recording me (oh, and he's threatening me and my dog)

...Yes 911, I said there's an african american man recording me (oh, right, and he's threatening me and my dog)

...what? I said there's a man threatening me. Send cops immediately

-------------------------------------------------

A little bit of license in blue. The rest is essentially correct'.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 04:37 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
An objective observer couldn't help but concur that Vikorr had proven beyond doubt that Oralloy was racist. He is racist.

izzythepush falsely accuses people of racism because he lacks the intelligence for anything other than name-calling.


izzythepush wrote:
He's also incapable of reason or understanding which is why he denies everything and confuses facts with opinion. He's not just deluded he's deranged, but this isn't news.

It's clear that Oralloy has been deranged for a very long time, at least as long as I've been on A2K. He rarely understands what is being discussed, pulls facts out of his arse, claims black is white and that he is some kind of supra genius instead of a very pedestrian dimwit with a limited vocabulary.

Note that izzythepush didn't actually provide any examples of me doing any of that.

That's because izzythepush is lying.

But I'll be happy provide some examples. Here is a good example of how stupid izzythepush is (and an example of how I am infinitely smarter than he is):

Funny joke:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-1#post-6356098

My instantaneous understanding of funny joke:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-1#post-6356102

izzythepush not instantly understanding funny joke:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-2#post-6356165

Funny joke explained to izzythepush some hours later:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-2#post-6356467

izzythepush finally gets funny joke:
http://able2know.org/topic/365993-2#post-6356482


izzythepush wrote:
We all know what Oralloy is, but he never will because he lacks understanding and reason.

The record shows that it takes you hours to comprehend something that I can understand in milliseconds. And even then you are still too stupid to figure it out without help.


izzythepush wrote:
Now he’s going to accuse me of lying, calling him names

Even someone as stupid as izzythepush can figure out that when he spouts lies and name-calling at people, they will denounce his lies and name-calling.


izzythepush wrote:
and he'll repeat the ludicrous assertion that he has an IQ of 170.

That you find reality to be ludicrous says more about you than it does anyone else.


izzythepush wrote:
The only person stupid enough to believe Oralloy has an IQ of 170 is Oralloy.

Actually it is just the opposite. It is the stupid people who don't believe it.

It is funny how stupid people always seem to think that there is some significance to whether they believe something or not.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  3  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 07:41 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
I'm not the one who is making people feel that they have to shoot threatening people instead of calling the police.

Dude, you are still off the deep end on this one. She would have ZERO justification for shooting that man and she would end up in jail for the rest of her life if she had. The treats were not deadly to the dog, it was a ploy to get stupid Karen's to put their dogs on a leash like they are suppose to.

Quote:
YOU are the one who is doing that.

I'll have to agree with the other posters on this one. You are the one doing everything you can to justify some way for this lady to be correct and it just doesn't happen that way unless you have some sort of bias against "bird watchers"...

Quote:
What I'm doing is saying that you are wrong to do that.

You would be better served by moving on to another topic.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 07:53 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
Dude, you are still off the deep end on this one. She would have ZERO justification for shooting that man

That is incorrect. People have the right to be safe from dangerous thugs.


Baldimo wrote:
and she would end up in jail for the rest of her life if she had.

Not if she quietly slipped away before the police arrived.


Baldimo wrote:
The treats were not deadly to the dog,

She had no way of knowing that.


Baldimo wrote:
I'll have to agree with the other posters on this one.

That makes you just as wrong as they are.


Baldimo wrote:
You are the one doing everything you can to justify some way for this lady to be correct and it just doesn't happen that way unless you have some sort of bias against "bird watchers"...

That is incorrect. People have the right to be safe from dangerous thugs.


Baldimo wrote:
You would be better served by moving on to another topic.

If I stopped defending innocent people, the primary beneficiaries would be the lynch mobs who seek to harm those innocent people.

It is hard to see how I would benefit since I am not part of those lynch mobs.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 08:02 am
@oralloy,
This is the slimeball president you defend
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-tweets-baseless-conspiracy-theory-about-75-year-old-protester-violently-shoved-to-ground-by-buffalo-police/ar-BB15feHr?ocid=spartandhp
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 08:07 am
@MontereyJack,
I haven't had time to look into the incident in question. But Mr. Trump does a great job of protecting America from progressives.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  2  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 08:12 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
That is incorrect. People have the right to be safe from dangerous thugs.

In general you are 100% correct, in this case you are not.

Quote:
Not if she quietly slipped away before the police arrived.

So that would be murder, not self-defense. Besides, he was recording her that is why she originally called, she didn't want to be recorded and she threw a temper tantrum. Notice how you ignore the abuse she did against her dog, dragging it around by the neck and chocking it. That is not a nice lady and only thinks about herself, that much is very clear from the video. That man was very smart to record the event as proof she was bat **** crazy.

Quote:
She had no way of knowing that.

She also would have had no reason to find out if her dog was on it's leash like it was suppose to be.

Quote:
That is incorrect. People have the right to be safe from dangerous thugs.

People do have the right to be safe from thugs, but that guy wasn't a thug. Do you know many thugs who go bird watching? He was Steve Urkle and nothing more.

Quote:
If I stopped defending innocent people, the primary beneficiaries would be the lynch mobs who seek to harm them.

If you think your words to the majority of the old people on this site are going to prevent them from lynching people, then go ahead. I do mean old people as it seems most of the people who post in the political forums are older than 65. Me, I'm only 46, still young and spry... except for my knees, they feel like they are 75.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 08:15 am
@oralloy,
when one extreme far right [oster here is dissed by another far right poster here, you know he's hit new depths in extremist absurdity.
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 08:27 am
@MontereyJack,

it remains to be seen which side pinkie takes...
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 08:36 am
@MontereyJack,
I'm not far right, I'm much closed to being in the middle than you are or most of those on this site. Only those to the far left would see me as far right. The extremists on both sides have shifted the Overton window.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 09:05 am
@Baldimo,
I've seen much more rightist stuff than centrist from you, tho not much of the nutball right wing stuff the usual suspects post. no one seems able to penetrate oralloy's trolling.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 01:22 pm
@MontereyJack,
Standing in the way of your attempt to lynch an innocent person is hardly trolling.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 01:24 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
In general you are 100% correct, in this case you are not.

Amy Cooper has just as much right to defend herself as anyone else does.


Baldimo wrote:
So that would be murder, not self-defense.

That is incorrect. Protecting yourself from a dangerous thug is self defense.


Baldimo wrote:
Besides, he was recording her that is why she originally called, she didn't want to be recorded and she threw a temper tantrum.

Yes. She found his behavior quite menacing.


Baldimo wrote:
She also would have had no reason to find out if her dog was on it's leash like it was suppose to be.

Irrelevant. She still has the right to be safe from dangerous thugs.


Baldimo wrote:
People do have the right to be safe from thugs, but that guy wasn't a thug.

Then it's a good thing that she reacted to his threats by calling the police instead of pulling a gun.

It's mystifying why you would want to prevent people from calling the police so their only defense is to pull a gun.

I can already foresee the attempts to blame me when that starts happening. But I'm not about to let myself be blamed for the results of progressive ideology.


Baldimo wrote:
If you think your words to the majority of the old people on this site are going to prevent them from lynching people, then go ahead.

Thank you. I will.
neptuneblue
 
  3  
Reply Tue 9 Jun, 2020 02:16 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
It's mystifying why you would want to prevent people from calling the police so their only defense is to pull a gun.


It WASN'T her last resort though.

She had the opportunity, time and motivation to WALK AWAY.

SHE choose to escalate. And she got caught, and apologized for HER poor behavior. What don't you get about that?

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.93 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 12:54:09