Have Any Of The A2K Men Ever Recieved This Look?

So is it tit for tat, then? If a woman cheats it's because she's not getting any, getting enough, getting off (excuse my vulgarity)? Is her man disappointing her in some way?

Roxxxanne wrote:

I didn't see it as an attack on Silda. I read it as an attack on marriage and the fact that humans are not naturally monogamous.

Why not? Maher specifically said ".....there are actually no good options for an Eliot Spitzer, and the ZILLIONS OF PEOPLE JUST LIKE HIM,....."
assuming that Spitzer didn't get any sex at home, and therefore his
hooker escapades are excused, since Silda refused. That's exactly implied
in Maher's statement.

spendius, you're an intelligent, well written, articulate person, you have a
great deal of contributions to many subjects, however, when it comes to
women and sex, I truly think you're all theory, and no practice, so I cannot take too seriously here.

I originally made of Bill Maher putting the blame on Silda.

CalamityJane wrote:

I originally made of Bill Maher putting the blame on Silda.

Would you be kind enough to explain the above sentence, Jane?

Thank you. I appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

I think you inferred rather than Bill implying it.

First of all, Bill Maher is a comedian, so let's not hang on every word nor over-analyze a comedy monologue. But the way I took it was that he was talking about married people in general not the Spitzers in particular. And as he mentioned after twenty years, for most,the thrill is gone and even if it's not, there is "the kinky stuff that wifey definitely won't do.

Baer, if everyone here spoke up on the subjects she/he is only qualified for,
then it would be pretty empty around here, but this is besides the point
I originally made of Bill Maher putting the blame on Silda.

What's with the fascination with all this?????????

Has anyone made the point that women get TheLook too?

Well, Dlowan, my interest is the intersection between my "so it goes" general view and the particular perturbation here because this guy built his career not only on going after Wall Street - which 'going after' I am not able to make judgements about because of my thoroughgoing ignorance about it all, though I gather it was a kind of burn the town effort - but also on his apparently extensive prosecution of prostitution rings. He has risen, I gather, as a fixer of evil doings.



I'm not so clear on how terribly he has acted re legality, Mann act stuff or not... but I see him as needing to have stepped down politically to improve the well being of, er, the running of New York. I'm not sure I'm right on that, but that's my opinion to date.



Not all our interest is from prurient puritanism yet again. I am also interested in Stila, but only as I am interested in many other people in various life situations, who seem like they could verbalize their opinions if they felt like it. I am clear that how she feels is not my business.