0
   

Have Any Of The A2K Men Ever Recieved This Look?

 
 
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 03:08 pm
It means

"for the foreseeable future, you won't be able to get a hat pin between my legs"


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v288/stevetheq/sorry.jpg
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 6,997 • Replies: 179
No top replies

 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 03:10 pm
No.

If you are right about the meaning of that look...
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 03:10 pm
Believe me I'm right.
0 Replies
 
stevewonder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 03:11 pm
Re: Have Any Of The A2K Men Ever Recieved This Look?
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
It means

"for the foreseeable future, you won't be able to get a hat pin between my legs"

Like she didnt know he was in 'hookersville'

and like he is going to stop........

Hilary knew (and still does) they all know, but there are other perks to the job........like I dont know......going for president???
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 05:01 pm
Francis wrote:
No.

If you are right about the meaning of that look...


Oh, puhleeze.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 05:07 pm
Re: Have Any Of The A2K Men Ever Recieved This Look?
stevewonder wrote:
Like she didnt know he was in 'hookersville'

and like he is going to stop........

Hilary knew (and still does) they all know, but there are other perks to the job........like I dont know......going for president???

I'm sure she did not know and I'm amazed she stood up there with him. She didn't have to.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 05:08 pm
I think that many people are well aware that powerful men often have liaisons with women other than their wives. Often the wives are well aware of their mate's extracurricular activities. The problem with Spitzer, was that he was a pious hypocrite.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 05:12 pm
I think the sad part for her is that America sees those pictures and they don't look at him, they look at her. They look at the train wreck that was a reportedly happy marriage two days ago and they can't look away. I know her face was the first thing I noticed when I saw this on the news. You don't see defiance or political damage control, you just see suffering.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 05:16 pm
engineer-I agree. And what about the kids?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 06:36 pm
Yup that's all I see (suffering) and the photo above doesn't capture what the video shows. She obviously had been crying profusely. It is really sad. Silda Spitzer is quite a woman, Harvard Law, top corporate daughter, raised three daughters. She will be fine.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:01 pm
Re: Have Any Of The A2K Men Ever Recieved This Look?
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
It means

"for the foreseeable future, you won't be able to get a hat pin between my legs"


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v288/stevetheq/sorry.jpg


Yep...that or she's fantasizing about getting between his with an axe.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:10 pm
I've had a lot worse looks than that. It's a challenge.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:11 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v288/stevetheq/sorry.jpg

There is a tremendous amount of emotion in that woman's face. I see pain, suffering, anger, remorse, resignation...

I feel sorry for her. I hope she unleashes the full force of her fury upon that dude and reduces him to a pile of smoldering ash.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:14 pm
Traitor.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:17 pm
She's thinking: "This bastard is going to pay for it big time!" and hopefully
he will.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:29 pm
I don't believe Silda Spitzer had a clue, or she would have found a way to stop him. She was too practical and intelligent to allow her power house of a husband to self-destruct. It was her public and personal life too that was at risk. I think she will divorce him when the dust settles on all this.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:32 pm
Is it that serious. Good grief!

Stand By Your Man was a ball of shite was it?
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:37 pm
spendius wrote:
Is it that serious. Good grief!

Stand By Your Man was a ball of shite was it?


Yes, I'm serious. I saw Mrs. Spitzer speak a number of years ago and there is no way that tough woman is going to stick around and comfort her cheating husband. She' doesn't have the same kind of ambitions as Hillary, she knows she will be just fine without him, especially after she takes him to court for a chunk of their wealth.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 07:39 pm
spendius wrote:
Is it that serious. Good grief!

Stand By Your Man was a ball of shite was it?


It's just a song, silly!
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 08:30 pm
I don't understand why she is anywhere near the bastard.

There is no way in hell I would be seen at my spouses side after she publicly cheated on me.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Have Any Of The A2K Men Ever Recieved This Look?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/20/2024 at 07:46:54