0
   

Have Any Of The A2K Men Ever Recieved This Look?

 
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 12:50 pm
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 12:53 pm
Re: Have Any Of The A2K Men Ever Recieved This Look?
H2O_MAN wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
It means

"for the foreseeable future, you won't be able to get a hat pin between my legs"


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v288/stevetheq/sorry.jpg


I bet she's thinking:

You dumb S.O.B. !!
You could have just raped the girl and then used the proven
Bill Clinton defense, at least you could have stayed in office!


Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
or better yet raped her and then used the time proven method that worked for more than one of the Kennedy boys :wink:



Yep :wink:
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:05 pm
Green Witch wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
I think that's why the majority of sex workers are Lesbians as it is easier to deal with emotionally when you don't like men.


That is an incorrect statement. Lesbian populations are way too small to fill the numbers of believed sex works. The vast majority of prostitutes are abused heterosexual women who have come from tragic home situations and are now technically enslaved by a man who continues to abuse them (physically and with drugs) for financial gain.



I can't recall knowing a single sex worker who even alleges to be straight. Of course, most of them, aren't, by definition, exclusively lesbian. But the vast majority are not exclusively heterosexual either. Of course, I am talking IRL not some social study.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:24 pm
IMO, any rational society, seeing that sex-for-pay is occurring, would legalize and regulate the business.

Ditto for illegal drugs.



I don't think you can compare the industry now to what it would be like after it is legalized.

Bootleggers were a nasty bunch in the days of prohibition; Budwieser advertises in the Super Bowl now.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 09:33 am
Quote:
Bootleggers were a nasty bunch in the days of prohibition; Budwieser advertises in the Super Bowl now.


Do you truly want an advertisement for prostitutes on football game commercials? Do you want your daughter (or son) to have aspirations to be a prostitute? I am guessing you don't not just because of the immorality of it but because it is degrading even if it is regulated. But if it was regulated, at least they might be able to get a hold on the violence and exploitation and forcing people to be prostitutes which seems to be a world problem.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 09:49 am
they already let them advertise for gold toothed rappers and NBA stars... from the time they're 3 they see commercials which make father's out to be bumbling idiots who can't make breakfast and teach tell them to hold their breath until they turn blue so their folks will have to buy them the newest bestest widget, they're told that if they can't squeeze into a size three and their tits aren't falling out of their dresses like models they're useless... why not recruit them to be whores? Their values and heroes are in the toilet anyway.. after all pussy is the ultimate consumer good and that's all our children are trained for is to be consumers.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 10:41 am
If we accept that the modern media is a form of harmful conditioning, then we will have to contend with issue of free speech should we censor the modern media.

Which is the lesser of two evils Free Speech or Censored Media.

History proves that the modern media was not needed for the horrid atrocities of man's past, yet the censorship of the truth did great damage.

I suggest an uncensored modern media is less harmful than a censored modern media.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 10:44 am
oh don't get me wrong I'm not moralizing... just stating the obvious.... if all the other stuff is okay.... you might as well advertise for hookers... in for a dime in for a dollar...

except of course next thing you know people will be marrying animals....
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 11:28 am
It's the old slippery slope logical fallacy:
Quote:
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach it in the public school, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools, and the next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church.

At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers. Soon you may set Catholic against Protestant and Protestant against Protestant, and try to foist your own religion upon the minds of men. If you can do one you can do the other.

Ignorance and fanaticism is ever busy and needs feeding. Always it is feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers, tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lectures, the magazines, the books, the newspapers.

After [a]while, your honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth century when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind.


Source: Clarence Darrow, The Scopes Trial, Day 2
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 02:40 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
oh don't get me wrong I'm not moralizing... just stating the obvious.... if all the other stuff is okay.... you might as well advertise for hookers... in for a dime in for a dollar...

except of course next thing you know people will be marrying animals....


Many years ago I wore, among other hats, the Information and Public Relations Officer hat at the hospital in Pittsburg KS. Pittsburg is a small town meaning that discretion is sometimes hard to come by. I was at the admissions desk one afternoon when one of the rumored local ladies of the evening came in with a minor emergency. She left her purse in the care of admissions as she was taken back to the examination room. It wasn't a large purse but it must have weighed 25 pounds or more.

We figured she must have dealt in quarters.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 04:32 pm
revel wrote:
Quote:
Bootleggers were a nasty bunch in the days of prohibition; Budwieser advertises in the Super Bowl now.


Do you truly want an advertisement for prostitutes on football game commercials?

I'm not sure what your point is, here. I made a point about how the culture surrounding a product changes after it is legalized, and you want to argue over what's advertised on TV?

Because the Super Bowl ads are simply swamped with the sex-related merchandise that is already legal....

revel wrote:
Do you want your daughter (or son) to have aspirations to be a prostitute? I am guessing you don't not just because of the immorality of it but because it is degrading even if it is regulated.

There are lots of professions that I don't much want my daughters pursuing. What does that have to do with whether prostitution should be legalized? I don't want 'em in the military, but I acknowlege the role played by soldiers. I don't want 'em to be santitation workers, but I sure like having someone come by and pick up my garbage.

Prostitution's gonna have two components, IMO.

One is providing sex for money, which is non-skilled labor.

The other is making someone feel good emotionally, which I imagine is what $4,000/night call girls are all about.

revel wrote:
But if it was regulated, at least they might be able to get a hold on the violence and exploitation and forcing people to be prostitutes which seems to be a world problem.

At last, you seem to grasp the crux of my argument.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 04:33 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
oh don't get me wrong I'm not moralizing... just stating the obvious.... if all the other stuff is okay.... you might as well advertise for hookers... in for a dime in for a dollar...

except of course next thing you know people will be marrying animals....


Many years ago I wore, among other hats, the Information and Public Relations Officer hat at the hospital in Pittsburg KS. Pittsburg is a small town meaning that discretion is sometimes hard to come by. I was at the admissions desk one afternoon when one of the rumored local ladies of the evening came in with a minor emergency. She left her purse in the care of admissions as she was taken back to the examination room. It wasn't a large purse but it must have weighed 25 pounds or more.

We figured she must have dealt in quarters.

Or carried a sawed-off sledge hammer for self defense....
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 04:57 pm
Drewdad - in your sig line, is that Terry Pratchett the writer? I just read one of his books - and loved it. Just trying to think of the name of it (or plot, even!) now - I've gone through so many books. But it was really charming. Can you give me a hint - oh! It was about a young girl who became a wizard. Ring any bells?
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 04:57 pm
Why do you guys want to legislate sex between consenting adults?

The prostitutes want to earn money by having sex. Why should they be prevented from doing so-- obviously they are benefiting from the arrangement.

The customers want to have sex, and are willing to pay money. Why should they be prevented from doing so?

The crime is when someone is forced into this arrangement against their will. By legalizing prostitution that is consensual and provides a perceived benefit to both parties involved, you not only offer people another option to do something they enjoy, or earn a living-- you also make it much easier to stop human trafficking and forced prostitution that now thrives in the shadows.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2008 09:44 pm
Mame wrote:
Drewdad - in your sig line, is that Terry Pratchett the writer? I just read one of his books - and loved it. Just trying to think of the name of it (or plot, even!) now - I've gone through so many books. But it was really charming. Can you give me a hint - oh! It was about a young girl who became a wizard. Ring any bells?

Equal Rites.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 12:01 am
It's called going postal Laurena Bobbitt style ...
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 07:56 am
Bill Maher's Take

I'm going to throw the remote through the TV if one more news twink says something on the order of "When we come back, we'll look into what drives a successful man like Eliot Spitzer to risk it all..."

Oh yes, let's convene a panel of experts for that. Let me help you: because he wants to get his nut off! Stop with all the analysis! It never ends, I hear all these people talking about how powerful people think they can get away with anything, so it's a thrill, or that it's for this psychological reason or this one -- please, he wanted to CUM WITH SOMEONE! Stop overthinking this: people need sex, and married people generally aren't getting it. Studies show (OK, I'm making that up, but it's true nonetheless) that people married 20 years only have sex on Valentine's Day, their anniversary, and their birthdays. You can hate me as the messenger, but it's true -- how can anyone be expected to still want to score with someone you've been having sex with for a score? Mr. Spitzer simply wanted what humans desire, to feel that sensational sensation when you're hot for someone, to touch and hug and bump and grind -- this is really not that complicated! If you're ascribing more to it than that, it's probably really more about your own fear that your spouse wants to do the same thing.

Or is doing it. Married people are often starved for sex, touch, affection, not to mention the kinky stuff that wifey definitely won't do. So if you find yourself at such a place in life -- and this is most certainly wives as well -- where you're dieing like this, you can do one of three things: get divorced, cheat, or continue to live a life with little or no passion, sex, etc. It's easy to point fingers, but how about some recognition that society's rules are so at odds with human nature that there are actually no good options for an Eliot Spitzer, and the ZILLIONS OF PEOPLE JUST LIKE HIM, many of who are tut-tut-ing today. I guess a guy is a hero who sticks it out and leads a life of quiet desperation. I'm not so sure it's heroic to make him.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 10:18 am
Green Witch wrote:
I don't believe Silda Spitzer had a clue, or she would have found a way to stop him. She was too practical and intelligent to allow her power house of a husband to self-destruct. It was her public and personal life too that was at risk. I think she will divorce him when the dust settles on all this.


That's right, Laura, blame the victim.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 10:49 am
Roxy wrote-

Quote:
Let me help you: because he wants to get his nut off!


Are you sure about that?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Mar, 2008 10:55 am
spendius wrote:
Roxy wrote-

Quote:
Let me help you: because he wants to get his nut off!


Are you sure about that?


Why are you asking me, ask Bill Maher.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/03/2025 at 03:03:03