SHUD the NYC Police
be criminally prosecuted ?
Do the police belong in prison ?
I re-iterate:
UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 18 -
CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I -
CRIMES CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS
§§ 241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any inhabitant
of any State ... in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or privilege secured to him by
the Constitution or laws of the United States,
or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another,
with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -
They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;
and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
§§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law, statute,
ordinance, regulation, or custom,
willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State...
to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured or protected
by the Constitution or laws of the United States...
shall be fined not more than $1,000
or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;
and if bodily injury results shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;
and if death results shall be subject to imprisonment for
any term of years or for life.
David, have you looked into whether, or to what degree, this man was indeed criminal?
he couldn't have read a single article about the case or so i hope.
Dave is just Dave....
Kinda like Manny, but no home runs....
Go look at the perp, dave, Manny will just confuse you...
cjhsa wrote:Walter Hinteler wrote:cjhsa wrote:You're paranoid about people with guns. I am not. Everyone should have them. Get it?
Again the wrong term (and besides: why and how did I get my marksman certificate, you think?), and again you show .... well: see above.
No, it isn't the wrong term. Now you're a troll. You even look like one in your avatar.
He appears to have his head on his shoulders, contrary to your observation in an earlier post.
The ice is getting thin when cj is poking Walter's privates...
Dave, done yer research yet????
Let me ask you a hypothetical, David:
Assume a man walks into a bank, pulls out a handgun, and demands that the teller give him all the money, which he/she does. Next, assume a law enforcement officer happens upon him during the act, takes his gun away from him, and locks him up in jail.
What property crimes have been committed, in your opinion?
OmSigDAVID wrote:snood wrote:David, have you looked into whether, or to what degree, this man was indeed criminal?
No
"Never confuse absolute loyalty to an obsession by examining possibly contradictory information": That's your motto, I assume?
Ticomaya wrote:Let me ask you a hypothetical, David:
Assume a man walks into a bank, pulls out a handgun, and demands that the teller give him all the money, which he/she does. Next, assume a law enforcement officer happens upon him during the act, takes his gun away from him, and locks him up in jail.
What property crimes have been committed, in your opinion?
The bank robbery; ( not the disarmament ).
The officer was defending the bank,
which is proper.
David
dlowan wrote:OmSigDAVID wrote:snood wrote:David, have you looked into whether, or to what degree, this man was indeed criminal?
No
"Never confuse absolute loyalty to an obsession by examining possibly contradictory information": That's your motto, I assume?
No; its: don 't underestimate my loyalty to laziness.
Sometimes I feel less energetic than others.
But wouldn't it just make sense, if you and cjsha are going to be using this man's situation as a rallying point for your "cause", that you would at least minimally ensure that he was on the right side of the law?
No, it doesn't matter. Trial by media and sensationalizing of a real non-discovery is the point.
You're missing the forest for the trees. This is election year sensationalism.
Bloomberg and his NYPD are anti-2A. So's Guliani, Obama, Clinton, even Romney to a degree.
Either word up on the Constitution or never expect to be President. The NRA and its members will make sure of it.
