NYPD Finds "Gigantic" Weapons Cache - Arrests Lawful Owner

You're missing the forest for the trees. This is election year sensationalism.

Bloomberg and his NYPD are anti-2A. So's Guliani, Obama, Clinton, even Romney to a degree.

Either word up on the Constitution or never expect to be President. The NRA and its members will make sure of it.

Ticomaya wrote:

Let me ask you a hypothetical, David:

Assume a man walks into a bank, pulls out a handgun, and demands that the teller give him all the money, which he/she does. Next, assume a law enforcement officer happens upon him during the act, takes his gun away from him, and locks him up in jail.

What property crimes have been committed, in your opinion?

The bank robbery; ( not the disarmament ).
The officer was defending the bank,
which is proper.

David

cjhsa wrote:

You're missing the forest for the trees. This is election year sensationalism.

Bloomberg and his NYPD are anti-2A. So's Guliani, Obama, Clinton, even Romney to a degree.

Either word up on the Constitution or never expect to be President. The NRA and its members will make sure of it.

How, exactly?

They built their case of public opinion by releasing photos of the "cache" and calling it that before announcing the charges against the guy.

cjhsa wrote:

They built their case of public opinion by releasing photos of the "cache" and calling it that before announcing the charges against the guy.

No.

Spin troll spin.

Did you read (carefully) what I originally posted and do you know what propoganda is?

All it said was that he was arrested on "criminal weapons charges" yet all the stuff sppears to be legal - gun show/surplus crap.

People who think like you will be the death of all of us.

People who think like you will be the death of all of us.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:

Let me ask you a hypothetical, David:

Assume a man walks into a bank, pulls out a handgun, and demands that the teller give him all the money, which he/she does. Next, assume a law enforcement officer happens upon him during the act, takes his gun away from him, and locks him up in jail.

What property crimes have been committed, in your opinion?

The bank robbery; ( not the disarmament ).
The officer was defending the bank,
which is proper.

David

Interesting answer. But was the officer defending the bank,
or enforcing the law that makes bank robbery illegal?

cjhsa wrote:

People who think like you will be the death of all of us.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:

Let me ask you a hypothetical, David:

Assume a man walks into a bank, pulls out a handgun, and demands that the teller give him all the money, which he/she does. Next, assume a law enforcement officer happens upon him during the act, takes his gun away from him, and locks him up in jail.

What property crimes have been committed, in your opinion?

The bank robbery; ( not the disarmament ).
The officer was defending the bank,
which is proper.

David

Interesting answer. But was the officer defending the bank, or enforcing the law that makes bank robbery illegal?

Walter Hinteler wrote:

cjhsa wrote:

People who think like you will be the death of all of us.

Is that another self portrait?

Ticomaya wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:

Let me ask you a hypothetical, David:

Assume a man walks into a bank, pulls out a handgun, and demands that the teller give him all the money, which he/she does. Next, assume a law enforcement officer happens upon him during the act, takes his gun away from him, and locks him up in jail.

What property crimes have been committed, in your opinion?

The bank robbery; ( not the disarmament ).
The officer was defending the bank,
which is proper.

David

Interesting answer. But was the officer defending the bank, or enforcing the law that makes bank robbery illegal?

You are gonna confuse him.



Good point.

I don't get the symbolism of a smiley with a little butt on its head.

Dave, that would be rude.

he is suggesting you have trouble seeing the forest cuz of the trees,
I think....