Bella Dea wrote:nimh wrote:Bella Dea wrote:Oh my god, I don't even want to start because I've said at least 5 times that my "statistics" and my opinion have been based on my OWN EXPERIENCES.
But you seem to conveniently miss that every time and it doesn't seem to matter that you can base your perception of a stripper on the girls you've know, but I can't base mine on the ones I have known/seen. [..]
Go ahead, attack that statement and tell me I am making a generalization but the minute amything different comes out of your mouth you can just remember that your statment is based on the same thing mine is; your personal experience.
OK, so I was wrong and you didnt get the point, after all.
The difference between the perceptions I relayed and the perceptions you asserted is THAT I NEVER MADE ANY CLAIM ABOUT WHAT "MOST" STRIPPERS ARE LIKE.
You did.
How is that difference so hard to understand?
Love how you frickin' ignored what I said AGAIN.
I am not going to repeat myself for the umpteenth time. If you can't see with your own eyes what I've said, forget it. You're a lost cause.
If I may take a shot at this...
nimh is not objecting to the fact that you hold that opinion. It really has nothing to do with whether it's just your opinion or not. He is just saying that without any evidence but your own personal experiences with a miniscule percentage of strippers, you saying "most strippers are f*cked in the head" is meaningless. That's all he's saying.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On the other hand. Nimh, aren't there some things that you CAN make generalizations about? Sometimes things are just so commonly understood that it doesn't take personal experience to "know" them.
For instance, I believe that in general, gangmembers are violent drug-dealing thugs. Now, I've never been in a gang, I've never even known a gang member, but I've read about them, I've seen documentaries about gangs, and I've heard about them through talking to people. The general consensus is that yes, they really are violent drug-dealing thugs. Are they all? Of course not. But in general, I'd feel pretty comfortable in saying that MOST gang members are violent drug-dealing thugs.
Does that make any sense? Is it ever okay to make a generalization, and if so, when?