1
   

The Liberals Lack Of Morality

 
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:04 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Mmm Hmm.

Quote:
Every liberal anti war article has cost an American soldier their lives.


I would like to know, specifically, which soldier's lives were taken as a direct result of liberal 'anti-war' articles.



I firmly believe that had the liberal press shown solidarity after the "Mission Accomplished" statement the war in Iraq would have ended there..
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:06 pm
RexRed wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Mmm Hmm.

Quote:
Every liberal anti war article has cost an American soldier their lives.


I would like to know, specifically, which soldier's lives were taken as a direct result of liberal 'anti-war' articles.



I firmly believe that had the liberal press shown solidarity after the "Mission Accomplished" statement the war in Iraq would have ended there..


hmmm, maybe i would like to hang out with you, your clearly insane
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:09 pm
djjd62 wrote:
RexRed wrote:
You are not in very good company. Apparently that is not an issue to you.


if i had the choice of having edgar or you in my corner

i'd choose edgar every time

even as the hellfire and brimstone rained down

i imagine at the least we'd have a laugh or two


Good for you... NOT!
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:14 pm
RexRed wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Mmm Hmm.

Quote:
Every liberal anti war article has cost an American soldier their lives.


I would like to know, specifically, which soldier's lives were taken as a direct result of liberal 'anti-war' articles.

Quote:

Look whose pulling the C card Mr. San Francisco himself.


Oh, I'm not a Christian. Just pointing out that with your attitude, neither are you.

Cycloptichorn


Since when do Christinas have to be wimps and cowards? What specific scripture has given you that ideal? You might do well to not challenge me on what the Bible says and means.

Jesus gave his life so we could live.

Heb 4:16
Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.


There's a difference between being a wimp and coward, and advocating killing others. You should be able to realize this.

Quote:

I firmly believe that had the liberal press shown solidarity after the "Mission Accomplished" statement the war in Iraq would have ended there..


This is an incredibly stupid thing to write. I'm not trying to insult you personally, just pointing out that this has no relation to reality. It would be as if you said 'I firmly believe that my toaster controls the Universe.'

You didn't answer my question. Which soldiers, where, were killed because of a Liberal Media article? How did that article contribute to their death? In what ways?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:14 pm
djjd62 wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Mmm Hmm.

Quote:
Every liberal anti war article has cost an American soldier their lives.


I would like to know, specifically, which soldier's lives were taken as a direct result of liberal 'anti-war' articles.



I firmly believe that had the liberal press shown solidarity after the "Mission Accomplished" statement the war in Iraq would have ended there..


hmmm, maybe i would like to hang out with you, your clearly insane


And you are delusional...

The liberals were planning their anti-Bush rant as the statue of Saddam was falling.

The liberal anything goes French only weeks after 9/11 published a book accusing the US government of murdering our own citizens. (This was taken well by the terrorists too!) Look what happened in Spain? These radical Islamic attacks so close to home certainly shut up their French egg pie holes.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:24 pm
RexRed wrote:


The liberals were planning their anti-Bush rant as the statue of Saddam was falling.



you forgot, as the weapons of mass destruction were not appearing, as the admin was saying mission accomplished while the situation was clearly not in hand, as the whole thing was looking like a giant cash grab for the friends of W, as the taliban was still (and is still) a threat in afghanistan (the real place the war should be)
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:28 pm
My comments in red.
Cycloptichorn wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Mmm Hmm.

Quote:
Every liberal anti war article has cost an American soldier their lives.


I would like to know, specifically, which soldier's lives were taken as a direct result of liberal 'anti-war' articles.

You don't get it do you... We wouldn't be killing innocent people had the left shown solidarity and had they not been back-stabbing our president all over their worthless rags.

Quote:

Look whose pulling the C card Mr. San Francisco himself.


Oh, Iamb not a Christian. Just pointing out that with your attitude, neither are you.

Cycloptichorn


Since when do Christinas have to be wimps and cowards? What specific scripture has given you that ideal? You might do well to not challenge me on what the Bible says and means.

Jesus gave his life so we could live.

Hebe 4:16
Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.


There's a difference between being a wimp and coward, and advocating killing others. You should be able to realize this.

Quote:

I firmly believe that had the liberal press shown solidarity after the "Mission Accomplished" statement the war in Iraq would have ended there..


This is an incredibly stupid thing to write. Iamb not trying to insult you personally, just pointing out that this has no relation to reality. It would be as if you said 'I firmly believe that my toaster controls the Universe.'

You didn't answer my question. Which soldiers, where, were killed because of a Liberal Media article? How did that article contribute to their death? In what ways?

Cycloptichorn


Maybe your stupidity is that you do not understand the simple concept, together we stand, divided we fall. When a country is divided, soldiers in the field die. Does not take the reasoning facilities of a five year old to understand that.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:29 pm
RexRed wrote:
My rant is directed at the continued spiraling downward of the worlds ethics.


O tempora! O mores!

"Oh the time, the morals!"--So lamented the famous Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero, in 63 BCE, in regard to the famous Cataline conspiracy.

There is nothing new under the sun.

***************************************8

This thread is soooo gay Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:32 pm
djjd62 wrote:
RexRed wrote:


The liberals were planning their anti-Bush rant as the statue of Saddam was falling.



you forgot, as the weapons of mass destruction were not appearing, as the admin was saying mission accomplished while the situation was clearly not in hand, as the whole thing was looking like a giant cash grab for the friends of W, as the taliban was still (and is still) a threat in afghanistan (the real place the war should be)


And what WMD did Saddam use on the Kurds, his good looks? It doesn't matter necessarily where these WMD came from it matters who used them and why they were used... This is such lofty reasoning I don't expect you to be able to fathom it.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:32 pm
RexRed wrote:
My comments in red.
Cycloptichorn wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Mmm Hmm.

Quote:
Every liberal anti war article has cost an American soldier their lives.


I would like to know, specifically, which soldier's lives were taken as a direct result of liberal 'anti-war' articles.

You don't get it do you... We wouldn't be killing innocent people had the left shown solidarity and had they not been back-stabbing our president all over their worthless rags.

Quote:

Look whose pulling the C card Mr. San Francisco himself.


Oh, Iamb not a Christian. Just pointing out that with your attitude, neither are you.

Cycloptichorn


Since when do Christinas have to be wimps and cowards? What specific scripture has given you that ideal? You might do well to not challenge me on what the Bible says and means.

Jesus gave his life so we could live.

Hebe 4:16
Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.


There's a difference between being a wimp and coward, and advocating killing others. You should be able to realize this.

Quote:

I firmly believe that had the liberal press shown solidarity after the "Mission Accomplished" statement the war in Iraq would have ended there..


This is an incredibly stupid thing to write. Iamb not trying to insult you personally, just pointing out that this has no relation to reality. It would be as if you said 'I firmly believe that my toaster controls the Universe.'

You didn't answer my question. Which soldiers, where, were killed because of a Liberal Media article? How did that article contribute to their death? In what ways?

Cycloptichorn


Maybe your stupidity is that you do not understand the simple concept, together we stand, divided we fall. When a country is divided, soldiers in the field die. Does not take the reasoning facilities of a five year old to understand that.


No, it doesn't.

I'm just waiting for you to join the majority so that we can stand together. You are aware that the majority of Americans (and Iraqis) want us to leave, right? You are weakening our position with your stubborn refusal to join the majority.

You don't get it do you... We wouldn't be killing innocent people had the left shown solidarity and had they not been back-stabbing our president all over their worthless rags.

This is another statement which makes no sense. WHy would things have been different in Iraq? There wouldn't have been massive fraud, or sectarian violence as they fought for control of the new gov't? Terrorists wouldn't have gone to Iraq? Iran and Syria wouldn't be meddling in Iraq? If we all were behind the war effort, everything would be hunky dory?

You apparently think that writers of Liberal editorials are by and far the most influential and powerful people on the earth.

You failed to address my point that calling for beheadings of those who have not been charged with crimes is not a christian belief, not in the slightest, and in fact slaughter of the innocent is diametrically (look it up) opposed to the tenets of Jesus Christ.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:37 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
RexRed wrote:
My comments in red.
Cycloptichorn wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Mmm Hmm.

Quote:
Every liberal anti war article has cost an American soldier their lives.


I would like to know, specifically, which soldier's lives were taken as a direct result of liberal 'anti-war' articles.

You don't get it do you... We wouldn't be killing innocent people had the left shown solidarity and had they not been back-stabbing our president all over their worthless rags.

Quote:

Look whose pulling the C card Mr. San Francisco himself.


Oh, Iamb not a Christian. Just pointing out that with your attitude, neither are you.

Cycloptichorn


Since when do Christinas have to be wimps and cowards? What specific scripture has given you that ideal? You might do well to not challenge me on what the Bible says and means.

Jesus gave his life so we could live.

Hebe 4:16
Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.


There's a difference between being a wimp and coward, and advocating killing others. You should be able to realize this.

Quote:

I firmly believe that had the liberal press shown solidarity after the "Mission Accomplished" statement the war in Iraq would have ended there..


This is an incredibly stupid thing to write. Iamb not trying to insult you personally, just pointing out that this has no relation to reality. It would be as if you said 'I firmly believe that my toaster controls the Universe.'

You didn't answer my question. Which soldiers, where, were killed because of a Liberal Media article? How did that article contribute to their death? In what ways?

Cycloptichorn


Maybe your stupidity is that you do not understand the simple concept, together we stand, divided we fall. When a country is divided, soldiers in the field die. Does not take the reasoning facilities of a five year old to understand that.


No, it doesn't.

I'm just waiting for you to join the majority so that we can stand together. You are aware that the majority of Americans (and Iraqis) want us to leave, right? You are weakening our position with your stubborn refusal to join the majority.

You don't get it do you... We wouldn't be killing innocent people had the left shown solidarity and had they not been back-stabbing our president all over their worthless rags.

This is another statement which makes no sense. WHy would things have been different in Iraq? There wouldn't have been massive fraud, or sectarian violence as they fought for control of the new gov't? Terrorists wouldn't have gone to Iraq? Iran and Syria wouldn't be meddling in Iraq? If we all were behind the war effort, everything would be hunky dory?

You apparently think that writers of Liberal editorials are by and far the most influential and powerful people on the earth.

You failed to address my point that calling for beheadings of those who have not been charged with crimes is not a christian belief, not in the slightest, and in fact slaughter of the innocent is diametrically (look it up) opposed to the tenets of Jesus Christ.

Cycloptichorn


You seem to think that so called Americans can publically bash our president day after day and this will not have an effect on troop moral and enemy aid and comfort? You belittle the error as a child would. You think you can rationalize your way out of murder. You are guilty.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:38 pm
Setanta wrote:
RexRed wrote:
My rant is directed at the continued spiraling downward of the worlds ethics.


O tempora! O mores!

"Oh the time, the morals!"--So lamented the famous Roman statesman and orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero, in 63 BCE, in regard to the famous Cataline conspiracy.

There is nothing new under the sun.

***************************************8

This thread is soooo gay Rolling Eyes


Takes one to know one...

Liberals are nothing new.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:42 pm
Quote:
You seem to think that so called Americans can publically bash our president day after day and this will not have an effect on troop moral and enemy aid and comfort? You belittle the error as a child would. You think you can rationalize your way out of murder. You are guilty.


Yeah, that sounds about right. I don't believe the troops, nor the enemies troops, check the newspapers before they decide to go out and fight for the day. I don't believe that we wouldn't have had waste and fraud if people had been more firmly behind the war.

I call your idea the 'green lantern' theory of war: the idea that Will is the only thing that matters. Ridiculousness, of course, but then again, you aren't interested in facts or logic, but only in confirming your beliefs.

I remind you,

You failed to address my point that calling for beheadings of those who have not been charged with crimes is not a christian belief, not in the slightest, and in fact slaughter of the innocent is diametrically (look it up) opposed to the tenets of Jesus Christ.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:43 pm
RexRed wrote:
Maybe your stupidity is that you do not understand the simple concept, together we stand, divided we fall. When a country is divided, soldiers in the field die. Does not take the reasoning facilities of a five year old to understand that.


i'm no christian, but i've been to a few church services and read my bible, and i'm pretty sure that god is not particularily fond of lying

but

following your logic, the media and all the people who disagree with the war and the president, should lie to them selves and others and support the war and the president for the benefit of the country
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:45 pm
RexRed wrote:
And what WMD did Saddam use on the Kurds, his good looks?


Hell no, he used the chemical weapons old Rummy sold him just after he showed up in Baghdad with a shiteatin' grin on his face to shake old Saddam's hand . . .

http://michael.ellerman.id.au/misc/Rumsfeld-Saddam.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:03 pm
djjd62 wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Maybe your stupidity is that you do not understand the simple concept, together we stand, divided we fall. When a country is divided, soldiers in the field die. Does not take the reasoning facilities of a five year old to understand that.


i'm no christian, but i've been to a few church services and read my bible, and i'm pretty sure that god is not particularily fond of lying

but

following your logic, the media and all the people who disagree with the war and the president, should lie to them selves and others and support the war and the president for the benefit of the country


The left media is simply special interest brainwashing unsuspecting Americans with their foreign supported George Soros anti war rhetoric. The same thing happened with Viet Nam... the reason why there have not been "mass anti war protests" is because these socialist rats (Cindy Sheehan friend of dictators) did not count on Fox News to give an alternative view other than the left's special interest LIES.

This is why Fox news is watched more than all three other major news outlets combined... Your are digging your own pit deeper. Your lack of Christian discernment shows BTW. You are the minority...

Even congress agrees we should not pull out and leave a power vacuum...

Even the report released today clearly states that.

Without WMD Saddam was a growing and imminent threat to democracies around the world.

The oil for food debacle and Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan, Libya stockpiling WMD... the list goes on but your Bush bash take priority, you are sick in the head.

Get your head out of your ... before we have a dung hill here
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:05 pm
Setanta wrote:
RexRed wrote:
And what WMD did Saddam use on the Kurds, his good looks?


Hell no, he used the chemical weapons old Rummy sold him just after he showed up in Baghdad with a shiteatin' grin on his face to shake old Saddam's hand . . .

http://michael.ellerman.id.au/misc/Rumsfeld-Saddam.jpg


Actually congress voted to give Rummy the power to give those weapons to Iraq... (if you want to play the blame game bring it on.)
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:12 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
You seem to think that so called Americans can publically bash our president day after day and this will not have an effect on troop moral and enemy aid and comfort? You belittle the error as a child would. You think you can rationalize your way out of murder. You are guilty.


Yeah, that sounds about right. I don't believe the troops, nor the enemies troops, check the newspapers before they decide to go out and fight for the day. I don't believe that we wouldn't have had waste and fraud if people had been more firmly behind the war.

I call your idea the 'green lantern' theory of war: the idea that Will is the only thing that matters. Ridiculousness, of course, but then again, you aren't interested in facts or logic, but only in confirming your beliefs.

I remind you,

You failed to address my point that calling for beheadings of those who have not been charged with crimes is not a christian belief, not in the slightest, and in fact slaughter of the innocent is diametrically (look it up) opposed to the tenets of Jesus Christ.

Cycloptichorn


An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth... (I don't necessarily endorse that philosophy but liberty and secuity must not go unchecked.)

No they don't have to they read our rags, Al Jazeera, they find all of the pertinent quotes and deliver them to the terrorists in person.. They can read the liberal slants on the front page of Al Jazeera in between their morning prayers and their Cheerios. The problem is that "you don't think"...
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:15 pm
i don't advocate bringing the troops home and causing a power vaccum, i think you guys shouldn't be there at all, you should be helping my country men clean up the problems in afghanistan, if you'd made that your priority after 9/11, and had invested all your efforts there, there would have been plenty of time to invade iraq a few years later

instead you've done a half assed job of two wars and have squandered the the sympathies and support many countries had for you after September 2001
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 07:18 pm
Quote:
The problem is that "you don't think"...


Do you believe that an objective observer of this thread would come to the conclusion that the problem is that 'I don't think?'

I ask in all seriousness

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 07:24:20