2
   

Is abortion really wrong?

 
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 03:58 pm
echi wrote:
RL--
I can get with that, assuming that by "abortionists" you only mean those who perform abortions and not the pregnant women, themselves. I see no need to punish them, although they obviously need some kind of help.


That is my understanding of how the laws were enforced pre Roe. The 'medical practitioner' was the one prosecuted if a violation occurred.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 04:06 pm
[echi lowers his head, shuffles back over to real life's corner]
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 04:13 pm
Diest TKO wrote:
Real life doesn't answer questions.


If you are referring to this:

Diest TKO wrote:
Real Life - "If all abortion was illegal. Would we as a culture be able to take care of all of the children?"


then I am still trying to figure out how that relates to whether or not the unborn should be killed.

Are you saying that poor folks should abort, but the rich need not do so?

That was certainly the attitude of the early abortion advocates such as Margaret Sanger. They advocated abortion as being helpful in eliminating the poor, the uneducated and minorities.

Today Planned Parenthood continues that focus, having the majority of their US abortion clinics in areas with a high percentage of minority population, and expending considerable effort in third world countries among poorer and less educated populations.
0 Replies
 
kate4christ03
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 04:48 pm
reallife i have read alot about sanger and she held some sick beliefs....not only did she believe the things you stated but she also was a big fan of hitler.....she also believed babies that had any mental or physical defects should be killed to ensure a superior race.
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 05:06 pm
real life wrote:

then I am still trying to figure out how that relates to whether or not the unborn should be killed.


And whether it is your call to decide for everyone else.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 05:14 pm
flushd wrote:
real life wrote:

then I am still trying to figure out how that relates to whether or not the unborn should be killed.


And whether it is your call to decide for everyone else.


... to decide whether it is should be permitted by law. Anyone can choose to break the law.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 10:13 pm
real life, I do like this new soft approach but just to be clear....

You want a foetus to have full human rights from day one, and you want the death penalty for murder?

Perhaps we should give some thought to which actions (by any woman who has sex) may be considered negligent homicide for miscarriage? Remember that almost 50% of pregnancies end in miscarriage.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Sep, 2006 10:43 pm
Eorl wrote:
real life, I do like this new soft approach but just to be clear....


Nothing new from me.

Eorl wrote:
You want a foetus to have full human rights from day one, and you want the death penalty for murder?


We already have the death penalty for murder. I am not seeking anything in this regard.

Eorl wrote:
Perhaps we should give some thought to which actions (by any woman who has sex) may be considered negligent homicide for miscarriage? Remember that almost 50% of pregnancies end in miscarriage.


I think your figures for miscarriage are quite high.

Even if they were accurate, you would admit, I'm sure, that in most of these cases the woman was not even aware she was pregnant.

If she didn't know she was pregnant, you'll have a difficult time arguing she was negligent.

However, there are some states in which you can be charged with murder for killing an unborn child.

from http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003275760_ndig26.html

Quote:
East St. Louis, Ill.

Psychological exam ordered for woman

A judge on Monday ordered a psychological examination for a woman accused of killing a pregnant acquaintance and cutting her fetus from her womb.

Tiffany Hall, 24, is being held on a $5 million bond. Prosecutors say she killed Jimella Tunstall, 23, who was about seven months pregnant, and her fetus.

St. Clair County Associate Judge Heinz Rudolf entered not-guilty pleas on Hall's behalf on charges of first-degree murder and intentional homicide of an unborn child.


from http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060920/BREAKING01/60920014

Quote:
Pulaski County jurors convicted Luther D. Martin, 25, on Tuesday of two counts of first-degree murder in the death of Jerae James, 17, and her unborn child.

On Wednesday, jurors began hearing testimony in the sentencing phase of the death-penalty trial, hearing from James' mother about the effect of the killing on her family, from relatives of Martin and from jailers who said he was a model inmate.


from http://www.post-trib.com/news/davich/43393,Davich03.article

Quote:
A jury of David Green's peers found him guilty of the murder of his wife and unborn son. He killed her, for whatever reasons.



So if you can be charged with murder for killing an unborn child, why is it that you insist abortion must be allowed? Are only doctors allowed to kill with impunity?
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 08:25 am
flushd wrote:
real life wrote:

then I am still trying to figure out how that relates to whether or not the unborn should be killed.


And whether it is your call to decide for everyone else.


It is no more or less RL's call to decide this than to decide if/when/how born should be killed!

I don't get the impression that RL is so self-important as to make a claim such as this.

Why would you say such a thing?
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 05:32 pm
rl, I don't think killing a foetus against the mother's wishes should be "murder", however I do think it's an absolutely horrific crime that should be punished as strongly as murder.... (although, as you know, I'm against capital punishment entirely)

(Is this a good time to remind you of the bibles opinion about such a crime.?...it's up to the woman's husband to decide the punishment)

..but I don't think it's a relevant point to abortion law.

Late term abortions I personally find absolutely horrific, but still...it's not my decision, I'm not the life support system involved....and I still prefer safe sterile legal late term abortions to unsafe, dirty, illegal late term abortions.
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 05:49 pm
Making abortion illegal would not force women to have "unsafe, dirty" abortions. Obviously, a qualified practitioner would probably be harder to find. But then again, if a woman decides to abort in a back alley with a clothes hanger, that's her choice.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 06:10 pm
Ahhh, the old "no longer my problem" defense echi. Quite logically defendable, but from where I sit, cruel and inhuman.

Consider the case of a 14 year old girl pregnant with her father's child who fears being killed by her father if anyone finds out. Back alley is fine with you is it?

As for your claim "Making abortion illegal would not force women to have "unsafe, dirty" abortions" what do you make of this:

Quote:
Consequences of illegal abortion in Portugal
At least 20.000 illegal abortions are performed in Portugal each year. As a result of complications of these illegal abortions around 5000 women are attended in hospitals every year and approximately 100 women have died unnecessary in the last 20 years. (figures of Portuguese health ministry, information AFP). This means a woman in Portugal has an up to 150 times higher risk to die from an abortion than a woman living in the Netherlands.

The restrictive abortion laws in Portugal also result in abortion tourism to Spain. But many women can not afford a journey to Spain or a safe illegal and expensive abortion in Portugal. Especially women without the means for a medically safe abortion (poor women, minors, less-informed women and those living in rural areas) will turn to unsafe abortion practices with little emotional support.

Source: http://www.womenonwaves.org/article-1020.52-en.html
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 06:21 pm
Eorl wrote:
Ahhh, the old "no longer my problem" defense echi. Quite logically defendable, but from where I sit, cruel and inhuman.

Consider the case of a 14 year old girl pregnant with her father's child who fears being killed by her father if anyone finds out. Back alley is fine with you is it?


Definitely cruel. No doubt about that. But I have said all along that it's impossible to stop abortion. Legal or not, the practice will continue as long as it's considered a valid choice, and I will consider it my problem as long as it is.

Also, I happen to have a good friend who is a product of incest. She is well-adjusted and has a good relationship with her whole family. Don't ask me how.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 07:02 pm
The World Health Organisation states that:
Quote:
"Governments have to assess the health impact of unsafe abortion, reduce the need for abortion through expanded and improved family planning services, and frame abortion laws and policies on the basis of a commitment to women's health and well-being rather than on criminal codes and punitive measures. [...] Women who wish to terminate their pregnancies should have ready access to reliable information, compassionate counselling and in parallel, services for the prevention of unwanted pregnancy and management of complications." (From: Unsafe abortion: Global and regional estimates of incidence of a mortality due to unsafe abortion with a listing of available country data - Third edition, 1997 - Ref. WHO/RHT/MSM/97.16).
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 10:22 pm
Eorl wrote:

Consider the case of a 14 year old girl pregnant with her father's child who fears being killed by her father if anyone finds out.


A 14 year old who is pregnant with anybody's child is a victim of statutory rape in many jurisdictions.

Why should the rapist be protected?

Abortion clinics who do procedures on underage girls do not report that a crime has been committed, although the law often requires that suspected sexual assault, molestation or abuse of a minor must be reported.

Abortion clinics are given a pass on this routinely and the rapists are protected.

Should abortion clinics protect rapists, Eorl?
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 10:43 pm
Yep.

First I would protect the victim. If the perpetrator is protected as a consequence then so-be-it.

Did you think abortion clinics have those policies so that the rapists could drum up more business ?
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 12:12 am
real life wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
Real life doesn't answer questions.


If you are referring to this:

Diest TKO wrote:
Real Life - "If all abortion was illegal. Would we as a culture be able to take care of all of the children?"


then I am still trying to figure out how that relates to whether or not the unborn should be killed.

Are you saying that poor folks should abort, but the rich need not do so?

That was certainly the attitude of the early abortion advocates such as Margaret Sanger. They advocated abortion as being helpful in eliminating the poor, the uneducated and minorities.

Today Planned Parenthood continues that focus, having the majority of their US abortion clinics in areas with a high percentage of minority population, and expending considerable effort in third world countries among poorer and less educated populations.


You've still FAILED to answer the question. You can cite others very well, but answer the question.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 12:13 am
real life wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
Real life doesn't answer questions.


If you are referring to this:

Diest TKO wrote:
Real Life - "If all abortion was illegal. Would we as a culture be able to take care of all of the children?"


then I am still trying to figure out how that relates to whether or not the unborn should be killed.

Are you saying that poor folks should abort, but the rich need not do so?

That was certainly the attitude of the early abortion advocates such as Margaret Sanger. They advocated abortion as being helpful in eliminating the poor, the uneducated and minorities.

Today Planned Parenthood continues that focus, having the majority of their US abortion clinics in areas with a high percentage of minority population, and expending considerable effort in third world countries among poorer and less educated populations.


You've still FAILED to answer the question. You can cite others very well, but answer the question. And it's very related. How can it not be?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 12:30 am
Diest TKO wrote:
real life wrote:
Diest TKO wrote:
Real life doesn't answer questions.


If you are referring to this:

Diest TKO wrote:
Real Life - "If all abortion was illegal. Would we as a culture be able to take care of all of the children?"


then I am still trying to figure out how that relates to whether or not the unborn should be killed.

Are you saying that poor folks should abort, but the rich need not do so?

That was certainly the attitude of the early abortion advocates such as Margaret Sanger. They advocated abortion as being helpful in eliminating the poor, the uneducated and minorities.

Today Planned Parenthood continues that focus, having the majority of their US abortion clinics in areas with a high percentage of minority population, and expending considerable effort in third world countries among poorer and less educated populations.


You've still FAILED to answer the question. You can cite others very well, but answer the question.


Well, in the literal sense in which you phrased the question, it's difficult to give an answer.

'Cultures' do not care for children.

Individuals and families do.

So, what are you asking?

Are you asking if an individual woman decides not to abort, will she be able to care for the child she has chosen not to kill?

Yes, she can, or she can allow the child to be adopted.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 12:41 am
Eorl wrote:
real life wrote:
Eorl wrote:
Consider the case of a 14 year old girl pregnant with her father's child who fears being killed by her father if anyone finds out.


A 14 year old who is pregnant with anybody's child is a victim of statutory rape in many jurisdictions.

Why should the rapist be protected?

Abortion clinics who do procedures on underage girls do not report that a crime has been committed, although the law often requires that suspected sexual assault, molestation or abuse of a minor must be reported.

Abortion clinics are given a pass on this routinely and the rapists are protected.

Should abortion clinics protect rapists, Eorl?


Yep.

First I would protect the victim. If the perpetrator is protected as a consequence then so-be-it.


Do you think the victim is better protected by bringing the rapist to justice, or by letting him off free?

Eorl wrote:
Did you think abortion clinics have those policies so that the rapists could drum up more business ?


The abortionists care nothing about the victim of a rape and flout the law that requires them to report the crime.

This enables them to protect only their own interest -- to make a buck. Apparently you approve of this.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/16/2025 at 03:08:19