Dixie Chicks withdraw apology to Bush

I thought we were discussing their guts...

Natalie Maines is the ex-"fat one."

Tico(she's the one in the middle)Maya

Ticomaya wrote:

Natalie Maines is the ex-"fat one."

Tico(she's the one in the middle)Maya

Tico(still the misleading one)Maya, your blatant disregard for facts and your relish for tangents is truly a thing of wonder. Why aren't you stridently defending the lady's right to exercise her freedom of speech, especially, ESPECIALLY when she is SOOOO right on.


Once again, the Mirror headline springs to mind;

"How Can 59,054,087 People Be So Dumb".

Nobody has said she didnt have the right to exercise her freedom of speech.
That does not mean that there arent consequences for her because of what she said.

Nobody has said she didnt have the right to exercise her freedom of speech.
That does not mean that there arent consequences for her because of what she said.

Not Ready to Make Nice - Dixie Chicks

"It's a sad sad story when a mother will teach her daughter that she ought to hate a perfect stranger
And how in the world can the words that I said
Send somebody so over the edge that they'd write me a letter sayin' that I better shut up and sing or my life will be over"

Ticomaya wrote:

Natalie Maines is the ex-"fat one."

Tico(she's the one in the middle)Maya

Tico(still the misleading one)Maya, your blatant disregard for facts and your relish for tangents is truly a thing of wonder.

Why aren't you stridently defending the lady's right to exercise her freedom of speech, especially, ESPECIALLY when she is SOOOO right on.

What facts am I disregarding?

Ticomaya wrote:

What facts am I disregarding?

This has got to be the funniest thing that I've ever read. It has been pointed out, time and again, just how blatantly you disregard facts. What you are is a blatant purveyor of deception.

The bumper sticker might well have read;

TICOMAYA, BLIND FAITH IN BAD LEADERSHIP IS NOT PATRIOTISM

Umm, She had a baby last year as did the other two gals, so I guess if you dislike pregnant women you might call her "fat." Or "Fat for 9 months or so."

I am pointing out right now, to you, that it appears you are incapable of enunciating the facts you claim I was disregarding, and that you opted instead to make a general slur against me, which has proven to be your first resort at this site, and the primary reason I usually choose to not feed the troll when you post.

Ticomaya wrote:

I am pointing out right now, to you, that it appears you are incapable of enunciating the facts you claim I was disregarding, and that you opted instead to make a general slur against me, which has proven to be your first resort at this site, and the primary reason I usually choose to not feed the troll when you post.

The truth cannot be a slur, Tico. Whether it's the pointed disception or the sneaky tangents of this thread you disparage yourself with this blind devotion to liars and murderers.

It wouldn't be so bad even if there was some middle ground for you.

But there's just no facing the truth for you. Blind devotion is not patriotism. Turning a blind eye to America's wrongs is precisely the same as those who turned a blind eye to the Nazis' wrongs.

You're nothing but a troll.

Ticomaya wrote:

You're nothing but a troll.

Well, I seemed to have hooked one humongous bottom feeder, Tico.

This is what right wing nuts do. This is what they partake of, sometimes thru tangential diversions, sometimes blatantly. If you're not part of a solution seeking to stop the lying, then you're part of the problem.

Quote:

Hart: I thank the gentleman from Ohio for alloting me time to speak in favor of sustaining the President's veto. It's been a year since this House passed the Castle-Degette bill. In that year, science-not Hollywood-has helped us to debunk the myth of a promise for embryonic stem cell research. Hollywood supports it. Science created fraudulent experiments. Before last year's vote, they made arguments supporting embryonic stem cell research. They were coming fast and furious from our colleagues. During the debate in the Senate, the same arguments came. They cited Dr. Wong Wuk Suk of South Korea and his research. Supporters of his research said that he had cloned a human embryo; that he had found a way to produce embryonic stem cell lines that could be done routinely and efficiently. What happened later?

All of his research was debunked. The ethics of his research were called into question. It was revealed that his publications were faked, his experiments were unsuccessful, and the treatment of their egg donors as ethically grossly appalling. Mr. Speaker, I urge us to reject embryonic stem cell research as the science is not there. Since it is successful in treating patients using adult stem cells, and cord blood stem cells which we agreed to fund and the President signed and I believe we should support that and I yield back.

DeGetter: Of course the gentle-lady from Pennsylvania refers to the South Korea experiment which was not embryonic stem cell research rather it was somatic cell nuclear transfer, not at issue today…