0
   

Re: The Portrayal of Blacks in Popular Media

 
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2005 03:50 pm
"Friday" was a very good movie.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2005 05:42 pm
McGentrix wrote:
"Friday" was a very good movie.


You'd probably love stepinfetchit.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2005 07:22 pm
McG. You're not allowed to like Friday.

We should consult the acceptable list of movies starring black actors. It won't take but a second.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2005 07:41 pm
Apparently nobody liked the list I provided, either.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2005 08:10 pm
Trying to think of my favorite "black" movie, but considering the discussion, it seems hard to figure out what would qualify.

Black main character--with mixed cast:

Black sidekick of white guy:

All black cast:

Black main character, with theme NOT dealing with race:

Main cast, black, white people stupid:

Black main character, with race theme:

Black main character that was written for a white guy:

(We should disqualify Denzel. He's a gimmee in all categories.)

For Main cast, black, white people stupid:
Waiting to Exhale. A great chick flick--but I'm sure someone will say it bashes black men....
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2005 08:24 pm
I sort of watch this thread with bemusement.

My ex tried writing both plays and screenplays involving characters of varied backgrounds as he was raised as a white boy, one of few, something like three, in his class. His best friends, as the saying goes were


not white/anglo. So his characters drew from the real people he knew. I guess he was before his time. Plus, he wasn't that mature a writer when he started and didn't know the right people and so on. Lotta people writing scripts that don't get made.

I am trying to remember, Snood said a few pages back that things would be good when the main heroic character was black, I think. I should double check but I won't. I remember thinking the thought - yes, that would be good.
But then, after that, it would be getting there when the main character could be black (whatever) and evil, as in one of those movies with Laurence Olivier..
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2005 08:39 pm
Denzel--Training Day?

I don't think snood likes that one, either.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Nov, 2005 08:40 pm
Lash wrote:
(We should disqualify Denzel. He's a gimmee in all categories.)


Smile
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 03:20 am
Snood - Have continued reading along. I think the answer has become pretty clear - the majority of the paying public doesn't care if blacks are portrayed realistically in the media because
a)they're not black
b)noone else is portrayed realistically either (as if that's a legitimate reason - scuse me but it smells an awful lot like bullshit to me).

The majority of the replies here are as "one-note" (defensive) as they say your topic is. It's not their problem because they don't have to deal with it everyday. What I don't understand is why they don't seem to care about the feelings of the people who do.

Have a Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 06:26 am
Many of my all time favorite people have been black actors, and if they don't generally get the ideal parts, that does not diminish my admiration of their skill in their chosen profession. James Earl Jones is one of the finest actors I have ever seen. There are many others, but, lists are probably counter productive to a thread such as this. Some black performers would be accepted in almost any role they chose to play. Thinking of Will Smith, Morgan Freeman and Halle Berry as examples. I would think there are enough wealthy black actors that they could put together projects that depict themselves in whatever light they wish to be viewed.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 07:02 am
aidan wrote:
Snood - Have continued reading along. I think the answer has become pretty clear - the majority of the paying public doesn't care if blacks are portrayed realistically in the media because
a)they're not black
b)noone else is portrayed realistically either (as if that's a legitimate reason - scuse me but it smells an awful lot like bullshit to me).

The majority of the replies here are as "one-note" (defensive) as they say your topic is. It's not their problem because they don't have to deal with it everyday. What I don't understand is why they don't seem to care about the feelings of the people who do.

Have a Happy Thanksgiving everyone!


I think the comment unfair, Aiden. Most of us are not insensitive to other peoples' feelings, but there comes a time when you simply have to go with what is practical and reasonable even though some would prefer it to be different. The earlier deviation into television and movie codes, for instance, was not off base. Fifty years ago, blacks were generally stereotyped, yes, but stereotyped as maids, porters, news vendors, shoeshine boys etc. This did not 'feel' like stereotyping since the only black people that most white people knew were in fact living those kinds of real life roles.

Now the black people in television and movies are doing all the same stuff that people do in the world I live in: they are good guys and bad guys and everything from chauffeurs to nuclear scientists. Because they are living the kinds of lives that I see black people, in my world, living every day, again this does not 'feel' like stereotyping to me. It seems as realistic as any television or movies are realistic which is a whole different subject.

Maybe it would be helpful to understand better if Snood would be more specific about what he would like to see on television or in the movies.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 08:04 am
Aidan:

Quote:
Snood - Have continued reading along. I think the answer has become pretty clear - the majority of the paying public doesn't care if blacks are portrayed realistically in the media because
a)they're not black
b)noone else is portrayed realistically either (as if that's a legitimate reason - scuse me but it smells an awful lot like bullshit to me).


D'you smell that, too? Crying or Very sad

Quote:
The majority of the replies here are as "one-note" (defensive) as they say your topic is. It's not their problem because they don't have to deal with it everyday. What I don't understand is why they don't seem to care about the feelings of the people who do.


It's exactly the same as those who pooh-pooh the protestations Native Americans who have a huge problem with the mascots' names on sports teams. The Native Americans who complain say that to them it is offensive, backwards and hurtful. I take them at their word - I ain't Native American. But there are so many who can't or won't know how they feel that say their complaints are baseless and empty. They just cannot understand. And to hell with them.

Quote:
Have a Happy Thanksgiving everyone!


May yours be peaceful and warm and full of quiet joy, as well. Hey, Aidan, here's a case-in-point....

Foxfyre:

Quote:
I think the comment unfair, Aiden. Most of us are not insensitive to other peoples' feelings, but there comes a time when you simply have to go with what is practical and reasonable even though some would prefer it to be different.


So, by "most of us", I take it you are speaking for the whites in America? well, that's helpful - no need to ask araound, we can just listen to Foxfyre.
"Go with what's practical and reasonable"? Again, we are so lucky to have someone like you to clue us in to when to "go with" the status quo.
Are you from the moon?

Quote:
The earlier deviation into television and movie codes, for instance, was not off base. Fifty years ago, blacks were generally stereotyped, yes, but stereotyped as maids, porters, news vendors, shoeshine boys etc. This did not 'feel' like stereotyping since the only black people that most white people knew were in fact living those kinds of real life roles.


It didn't "feel" like stereotyping to you, huh? Well then, it must not have been. And anyway, there probably wasn't any disconnect between hollywood and reality then either, right? And the depictions that are out there now are still by and large accurate depictions of the "roles" blacks are playing today, right? You sure you're not from the moon?

Quote:
Now the black people in television and movies are doing all the same stuff that people do in the world I live in: they are good guys and bad guys and everything from chauffeurs to nuclear scientists. Because they are living the kinds of lives that I see black people, in my world, living every day, again this does not 'feel' like stereotyping to me. It seems as realistic as any television or movies are realistic which is a whole different subject.


Hey, if you're happy with the status quo, that's all that really matters.

Quote:
Maybe it would be helpful to understand better if Snood would be more specific about what he would like to see on television or in the movies.


I sincerely doubt that you will ever understand, foxfyre. But if I had hope for you, I would try to explain how I as a black man want to see nuance and complexity and weakness and madness and romance and grandeur depicted in those who look like me. I would try to explain how, while there are exceptions (as have been pointed out to me in this very thread), the rule is to package ethnics in the most easily digestible form for the unthinking public, along with the rest of the commercial-driven industry - packaged for those with nanosecond-long attention spans and rapidly shrinking souls.

But I won't try to explain those things to you, Foxfyre because you are infected with the blindness of those privileged never to have to think about these things until pressed.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 08:51 am
It is interesting that you expect others to see you and your life as you see it, Snood, but you hold in contempt the life others live and see? Could you explain this? Your characterizations of me are so off base, I don't know where to start. But I accept that you do see me that way. I am sorry for it, and I don't know how to explain it any better, and since you don't seem inclined to try, I won't either. You obviously haven't read any of my posts anyway.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 08:58 am
speaking of mascots and team names..

i wonder what would happen if, instead of Redskins, they were called Honkeys..?
or the Crackers?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 09:11 am
A good question Shewolf. Some Native Americans don't mind the team names; in fact the Seminoles and Utes are proud of being the representative mascot and have given full permission for their tribal identity to be used. Both chiefs have stated they consider it an honor.

I can't know how I would feel if I had been raised Native American. I do have some Cherokee blood but no cultural experience. I have a lot of Irish blood and don't mind Notre Dame being the "Fighting Irish" though I'm neither warlike nor Catholic.

"Honkeys" or "Crackers" I think I would laugh at, though I can't imagine a sports team wanting to be called by an unflattering image. Do you think a team being the Cherokees or Apaches or Seminoles or Utes is unflattering?

On this one I'm neutral. If the Utes and Seminoles don't have a problem, then the team name is fine. For those tribes that do have a problem with it, maybe the team should look at it.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 09:19 am
The names like Cherokees, Seminoles.. no.. I dont have a problem with.
And here is where I guess I sound like a hyprocrite..

Redskins? yeah.. I do have a problem with that.
That is a racial slang.. that is how the word started.

I do not believe it still has much power over us ( native americans ) anymore.. no where near the power that nigger has over black people.
There is no comparison there.

But- the idea that a word wich was used as an insult is now a team name?
Hmm.. that bugs me.

In 10-20maybe even 30 years will we have a team named Nigger? It was allowed with the word Redskin.. so why not?

honkey and cracker are in the same ball park.
They are unflattering insulting words.

Two hundred years ago "redskin" would fall under your very words - "" I can't imagine a sports team wanting to be called by an unflattering image""

and I think that is a sad thing.
Out of the millions of words in the english language.. or any language for that matter..
why is it ok for a racial slang to be used as a team name?

( not to de rail.. but .. )
I think it is simply because there are not enough Indians around to fight back anymore. So who cares..

This could very well happen for blacks as well.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 09:22 am
Pekin, Illinois, to the east of Peoria, was named for Peking in China (presently called Beijing by the politically correct), as Chinese from the construction of the transcontinental railroad had once lived there. Although the Chinese then in Peoria and Pekin were likely not descended from those Chinese, there was nevertheless a large population of them. (Peoria is the second city of Illinois, Chicago obviously the first, but Peoria's population was not that much over 100,000.)

Because of the origin of the town's name, the local high school in Pekin called its sports teams the Chinks. This was good until some out-of-town activists got all riled up over it in the late 1970's. It was a non-issue in the local Chinese community, but the name was changed because Pekin, not a large town, simply could not afford to defend itself from a lawsuit brought by an out-of-town, nay, and out-of-state, group. So it goes.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 09:23 am
I just got a Thanksgiving greeting and for the first time it had an ethnic theme. I thought it was cute. Does this offend anyone? I hope this works:

http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/view.pd?i=382219626&m=1652&rr=y&sou
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 09:36 am
Green Witch wrote:
I just got a Thanksgiving greeting and for the first time it had an ethnic theme. I thought it was cute. Does this offend anyone? I hope this works:

http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/view.pd?i=382219626&m=1652&rr=y&sou


I'm not offended. A little puzzled about what this has to do with this thread, but not offended. If a turkey singing Gloria Gaynor with a hint of faux black dialect and an afro counts as "an ethnic theme", I'd say raise the bar.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Nov, 2005 09:41 am
By the way, some email addresses appear on the bottom of the card. They are not mine and I don't know who they belong to. I can't remove them.

Snood - I never saw a Thanksgiving card with any motif that indicated Black people walked this earth and I lived most of that life in NYC. Plenty of Norman Rockwell motifs, but nothing east of 95th St. To me the greeting card industry counts as "media".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 06:11:44