This really has little to do with Cindy Sheehan, but the issue has been raised, so here goes.
Ticomaya wrote:But after being confronted with what happened to Jack Ryan, you amended your initial claim that it is unacceptable to examine the divorce records of a person (whose marriage is their "private life"), and say it is acceptable under certain circumstances.
If you examine
the post I made before your own, you will see that I have not taken a position on the rightness or wrongness of examining Ryan's divorce records. I will not, until I see the judge's decision explaining why he unsealed them.
Fact is, I have qualms about the original decision to look at Ryan's divorce in the first place. However, once that was done, the allegations made by his wife in the trial, along with Ryan's admission that he did indeed go to S&M clubs, had to enter into the race, for the simple fact that most people would think this is far beyond the usual hanky-panky. It is more than they can overlook.
Politicians never got complete green light to do what they want with whomever they want. Instead, there was a wise and workable tradition that as long the person kept things discreet, the press wouldn't pick it up.
Perhaps Ryan's divorce papers never should have been unsealed. However, once they were, it was pretty obvious that his candidacy was over. And it was his own party, the GOP, which made it clear that they would not support him and made him withdraw from the race..