@neologist,
neologist wrote:
Romeo Fabulini wrote:Only God knows whether he finds the trinity doctrine offensive. Personally I don't attach any importance to it, it's just something cooked up by mostly catholics.
You don't see how equating Jesus with his father dishonors God and demeans Jesus' sacrifice?
Surely you jest.
More than likely the invention of the trinity is a way to tie up lose ends in the narrative. From my point of view it is a new religion being built upon the back of another religion. If you compare ancient judaism with modern christianity they are nearly at odds if not fully at odds. In the torah and the old testament god is portrayed as wicked, vengeful and out right brutal to anyone it sees fit to want to mess with or destroy.
But modern christians want to ignore these things because the hippy jesus has changed things. But how is it that jesus is the change? Unless they are implying that the ancient jews got god all wrong and jesus was god's attempt to correct the wrong perception? Modern christians don't specifically address it but they imply it with the dismissal of all those characteristics.
So what they attempted to do was square the round peg. You can fix the problems of a wicked and vindictive ancient interpretation of god by claiming jesus was god in the flesh. But to do this you also need a way of separating the two because it doesn't make any sense how a god that is suppose to be seperate from the universe can impact it. This is why they invent the holy ghost concept.