@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Quote:One side sincerely believes that the border wall is immoral
Bullshit, unless they are idiots. Or should I say sincere idiots. They want illegals or their handlers do. It is more than obvious.
On one level, the border wall IS immoral. Using national differences and separation is immoral. That's why discrimination according to national origin is a protected category of discrimination.
The problem is that even if you eliminated borders and merged all the nations of the world into a single nation, you would still have national ethnic differences causes people to abuse and exploit each other. I.e. there would still be class warfare where people view each other in terms of national stereotypes and who wouldn't hesitate to exploit other ethnicities for money by selling them drugs or using them as drug couriers or whatever.
So in other words, ask yourself the following: If all of North and South America were merged into a single nation, would cocaine and other drugs stop being produced south of Texas and brought to cities north of Texas for sale? If not, why not? If there were no national borders, why wouldn't cross-border crime and human exploitation/abuse not stop? Answer: because it's not the border control that's creating nationalist divisions or the will to exploit national differences for money and power. The borders and border control are just a byproduct of something deeper and more sinister, and the sad thing is that they become part of the solution for stopping the crime and abuses that are being perpetrated as a byproduct of national differences, which is the only hope for liberating migration to occur freely throughout the world.