@oralloy,
Quote oralloy:
Quote:What part of the Constitution would be violated by giving Kavanaugh the same pass that the Democrats gave to Bill Clinton?
Constitutionally the standards are different. An elected official-an official sent to office by the people he represents-does not have to meet any standards the Senate has for him. The Founding Fathers were entirely unconcerned if the Senate thought he was a good choice or not-the Senate is stuck with him.
However, as a check against Presidential power, the Founding Fathers gave the Senate the power to veto the president's Cabinet appointments. So if the president the people elected is really out of line, the Senate can make the functioning of his government difficult. Bottom line, the Senate has to approve the Presdent's Cabinet choices.
The House and Senate together can remove the President from office, but not merely because they don't approve of him. He has to have done something really, really bad for them to remove him, that's why they make removal a two step process involving first the House, then the Senate.
Clearly, the Founding Fathers wanted two different standards for Cabinet appoinntments and impeaching of a President. The Cabinet appointment can be vetoed merely because the Senate does not think the nominee is particularly good. He doesn't have to be terrible, just not particularly distinguised enough to do justice to the Supreme Court of the United States. The President, however is already in office and cannot be removed except for the most dire reasons.
Therefore, the Constitution, and the Founding Fathers who authored it, intended for there to be entirely different standards for the Senate to confirm a President's nominee for Supreme Court or any other high office, and removing a President elected by the people he represents to serve them.