Jeb Bush for prez "08"

I'll step up and second Brandon's proposition.

0 Replies

BVT, I don't understand how a person could believe himself to be in the right, yet assume a debating technique of jabbing with irrelevant snipes and then running from any attempt to match competing philosophies fairly. Your debating technique says it all about most of the board liberals.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Sturgis wrote:
Bush is top of the line as a President...it is sad that so many fail to see this.

I second this...

This is as a joke, right? I mean, you guys like him more than a Democrat, OK, fine. But you really think he's "top of the line"?

Sad...

0 Replies

Brandon9000 wrote:

BVT, [..] Your debating technique says it all about most of the board liberals.

Brandon, you seriously think that BVT's debating is representative for that of most of the liberals on this board?

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

I'll step up and second Brandon's proposition.

I'm shocked.

0 Replies

nimh wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
BVT, [..] Your debating technique says it all about most of the board liberals.

Brandon, you seriously think that BVT's debating is representative for that of most of the liberals on this board?

nimh you seriously think I'm trying to debate any of these mouth breathers? :wink:

0 Replies

Brandon, my post clearly said that the evidence of corruption is now emerging. Lets see what transpires. Hell the GOP tried for 7yers to get something on Clinton and he finally did it himself, Bush isnt even half as intelligent.

0 Replies

D'artagnan wrote:

RexRed wrote:
Sturgis wrote:
Bush is top of the line as a President...it is sad that so many fail to see this.

I second this...

This is as a joke, right? I mean, you guys like him more than a Democrat, OK, fine. But you really think he's "top of the line"?

Sad...

No, what is sad is wish washy Kerry and the dems either are divided on MOST issues or they simply have no plan.. Then they have the gumption of asking for the president to lay out his plan in front of the enemy... And the dems think the American people can not see their idiocy... They insult the presidents intelligence but every one knows they are only attacking the president out of their own low self esteem and disarray...

0 Replies

farmerman wrote:

Brandon, my post clearly said that the evidence of corruption is now emerging. Lets see what transpires. Hell the GOP tried for 7yers to get something on Clinton and he finally did it himself, Bush isnt even half as intelligent.

Every party has their corruption and if there is going to be an implosion of corruption within the repub party then bring it on... It is better to get rid of this so called corruption so the party will outshine the dems even more... Especially when the corruption is really with the dems and their obsession with special interest... Let the dems point a finger if it eases their own guilty consciences...

0 Replies

Brandon9000 wrote:

BVT, I don't understand how a person could believe himself to be in the right, yet assume a debating technique of jabbing with irrelevant snipes and then running from any attempt to match competing philosophies fairly. Your debating technique says it all about most of the board liberals.

If Bush needed more bodies to add to the pile, would you volunteer yours? If you're unwilling to sacrifice yourself, then your philosophical support of the war becomes nothing but words without meaning. In other words, it's EASY for you to support Bush's war of aggression so long as somebody else is doing the dying, Brandon.

0 Replies

GWB = George Wars Blindly, supporters should enlist to prove how right he is.

0 Replies

farmerman wrote:

Brandon, my post clearly said that the evidence of corruption is now emerging. Lets see what transpires. Hell the GOP tried for 7yers to get something on Clinton and he finally did it himself, Bush isnt even half as intelligent.

I respect you, but the obligatory response is: "So you can't give even one example of this corruption you claimed was rampant, right?"

0 Replies

Debra_Law wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
BVT, I don't understand how a person could believe himself to be in the right, yet assume a debating technique of jabbing with irrelevant snipes and then running from any attempt to match competing philosophies fairly. Your debating technique says it all about most of the board liberals.

If Bush needed more bodies to add to the pile, would you volunteer yours? If you're unwilling to sacrifice yourself, then your philosophical support of the war becomes nothing but words without meaning. In other words, it's EASY for you to support Bush's war of aggression so long as somebody else is doing the dying, Brandon.

My personal virtues or faults have nothing to do with the correctness or falsehood of my position. Debating by trying to impeach the character of the source proves nothing, and you really ought to know that.

0 Replies

blueveinedthrobber wrote:

nimh wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
BVT, [..] Your debating technique says it all about most of the board liberals.

Brandon, you seriously think that BVT's debating is representative for that of most of the liberals on this board?

nimh you seriously think I'm trying to debate any of these mouth breathers? :wink:

You are clearly unable to defend your positions by argument.

0 Replies

Debra_Law wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
BVT, I don't understand how a person could believe himself to be in the right, yet assume a debating technique of jabbing with irrelevant snipes and then running from any attempt to match competing philosophies fairly. Your debating technique says it all about most of the board liberals.

If Bush needed more bodies to add to the pile, would you volunteer yours? If you're unwilling to sacrifice yourself, then your philosophical support of the war becomes nothing but words without meaning. In other words, it's EASY for you to support Bush's war of aggression so long as somebody else is doing the dying, Brandon.

I will offer myself for the cause of freedom, so others can live free... It starts by your support...

Also in your narrow minded stereotypes... If Bush is "responsible" for the deaths of our soldiers then what part in this "war on terror" did the terrorists play? You are living in fantasy.

Did Bush "make" the American soldiers enlist? Did Bush pull the trigger on the terrorists guns...

You just don't get it... We are at a war that is not of our choosing. We were chosen by Saddam and by the terrorists. We were chosen every time Saddam attacked our soldiers in the no fly zone... Or Bin Laden... They are both part of the same hate America ideology.

We were chosen at 9/11, Bali, Spain, London... and until each and every terrorist is dead we and our children will continue to be marked by these terrorists for death...

Now you can live oblivious to this fact until death comes to you and your family and then you can cry out and wonder why something was not done sooner... Well because you did everything in your power to stop our military from defending us.

Well something was nearly not done because of your left wing partisan obstructionists... Thank God there are enough courageous and sensible American left to recognize the threat and sacrifice their lives to correct the problem. Even in light of their sacrifice you still don't get it...

Does it make you proud to be part of the problem?

0 Replies

I do hope, RexRed, that otherwise you are feeling fine.

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

I do hope, RexRed, that otherwise you are feeling fine.

I feel fine, but occasionally someone has to just go and burn my onion... Smile

0 Replies

Debra_Law wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:
BVT, I don't understand how a person could believe himself to be in the right, yet assume a debating technique of jabbing with irrelevant snipes and then running from any attempt to match competing philosophies fairly. Your debating technique says it all about most of the board liberals.

If Bush needed more bodies to add to the pile, would you volunteer yours? If you're unwilling to sacrifice yourself, then your philosophical support of the war becomes nothing but words without meaning. In other words, it's EASY for you to support Bush's war of aggression so long as somebody else is doing the dying, Brandon.

Is it easier for you to support our soldiers than to act like you don't?

Is it easier to support the democracy of millions of people over partisan politics?

You should know the answer to these questions...

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

I do hope, RexRed, that otherwise you are feeling fine.

I hope you are fine too Walter... Sometimes I get on a roll... Smile

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

I will offer myself for the cause of freedom, so others can live free... It starts by your support...

Our support should have nothing to do with you backing up you positions by putting your body on the line. I don't know you, so I have to ask ... Have you even served in any of the armed services ??

RexRed wrote:

Also in your narrow minded stereotypes... If Bush is "responsible" for the deaths of our soldiers then what part in this "war on terror" did the terrorists play? You are living in fantasy.

You are probably one of those who can't be convinced that this attack on Iraq has been in Cheney's game book since 1992, but it has. The PNAC (1998) is not a product of our imagination, it's real, and it included the very people who pushed us into attacking Iraq. These people have dreamed if controlling the M.E. since Richard Nixon. You are probably one of those who can't be convinced that this attack on Iraq was based on nothing but lies, but most of us can see it. The war on Iraq has nothing to do with the "War on Terrorism" ... the terrorist attack on the Twin Towers was a convenient reason for those who wanted to attack and control the M.E. for decades. The only fantasy being played out here is that we are fighting the "War against Terror" by being at war with Iraq.

RexRed wrote:

Did Bush "make" the American soldiers enlist? Did Bush pull the trigger on the terrorists guns...

Of course not! However, I will ask you this. How many of those enlisted in the National Guard units actually think they would end up in a desert hellhole? This has not be the traditional deployment of Guard Units even in time of war. Why do you think young people fell over each other joining Guard Units during the VietNam war? THEY weren't being sent! I think I heard at one time that 45% of the troops deployed in Iraq are Guard Units! You will also notice that the services can no longer achieve recruiting goals either.

RexRed wrote:

You just don't get it... We are at a war that is not of our choosing. We were chosen by Saddam and by the terrorists. We were chosen every time Saddam attacked our soldiers in the no fly zone... Or Bin Laden... They are both part of the same hate America ideology.

Sorry Rex, this IS a war of our choosing! It's been desired for decades. We've wanted it since the first gas crises during the Nixon years. We were not "chosen by Saddam and the terrorists". Saddam and the people that were responsible for the taking down of the Towers had no connection. It did work out has a handy reason for invading Iraq though! The "no-fly" zone? Let me ask you, what would the response of the United States be if China designated a "no-fly" zone in the U.S.??

RexRed wrote:

We were chosen at 9/11, Bali, Spain, London... and until each and every terrorist is dead we and our children will continue to be marked by these terrorists for death...

You think we are going to kill each and every terrorist? Now there's a fantasy for you. Do you think there are MORE, or LESS terrorists now than in 2001??

RexRed wrote:

Now you can live oblivious to this fact until death comes to you and your family and then you can cry out and wonder why something was not done sooner... Well because you did everything in your power to stop our military from defending us.

That's outright silly!

RexRed wrote:

Well something was nearly not done because of your left wing partisan obstructionists... Thank God there are enough courageous and sensible American left to recognize the threat and sacrifice their lives to correct the problem. Even in light of their sacrifice you still don't get it...

Even more silliness!!

RexRed wrote:

Does it make you proud to be part of the problem?

The problem Dear Rex, is the U.S. desire to own and control everything.

Look here for the next area that we are going to cause trouble in which it will come back to haunt us !!

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=65962

Anon

0 Replies

Jeb Bush for prez "08"

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know