Not Much Brighter
msolga wrote:ferrous
That's enough ... Stop being personal & unpleasant!
Ad hominem:
Definition:
The person presenting an argument is attacked instead of the argument itself. This takes many forms. For example, the person's character, nationality or religion may be attacked. Alternatively, it may be pointed out that a person stands to gain from a favorable outcome. Or, finally, a person may be attacked by association, or by the company he keeps.
There are three major forms of Attacking the Person:
1. ad hominem (abusive): instead of attacking an assertion, the argument attacks the person who made the assertion.
2. ad hominem (circumstantial): instead of attacking an assertion the author points to the relationship between the person making the assertion and the person's circumstances.
3. ad hominem (tu quoque): this form of attack on the person notes that a person does not practice what he
preaches.
Seems littlek just had to get her "cute" little barb in... attacking me and maxdadeo, personally, while not dealing with specific issues, I addressed in my comment.
Now I get more of the same from you. Your lack of insight and thoughtful expression, is only surpassed by your rhetoric.
Is this what A2K calls civil discussion, or is it only civil, when everyone is toteing the same ideology?