@Real Music,
Real Music wrote:The democrats used the nuclear option to force Obama cabinet nominees through, because the republicans were not allowing up or down votes of his cabinet nominees at an unprecedented level.
Hardly unprecedented. The Democrats had just done the very same thing to Bush. And for no reason other than spite.
If the Democrats don't want to lose fights, they should stop picking fights.
I don't mean the Democrats shouldn't take a stand on things that are important. But when they blocked Bush's nominees out of spite, they weren't making a stand on principle. They were just picking a fight for no reason.
Real Music wrote:Let's be clear, cabinet positions are not lifetime appointments. The democrats never used the nuclear option to force Obama's federal judges or supreme court nominees through. The then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made sure that the nuclear option only applied to cabinet positions and not be applied to lifetime federal judges or supreme court nominees. This is a clear important distinction.
I acknowledge the distinction. I don't see why it matters.
If you go up to a biker gang and punch one of them in the nose for no reason, they might do more to you than just punch you in the nose.
Real Music wrote:As I stated above, the democrats never used the nuclear option to force through any federal judges or supreme court nominees. Only, this republican congress is guilty of this behavior.
The Democrats picked the fight. The Republicans won the fight.
Moral of the story: Don't pick unnecessary fights.