BP wrote:
Quote:Eva I don't believe the creator is a female. If that were the case
1. Men would have periods
2. Men, like women, would have to "feel close" in order to have sex.
3. Men would have babies
4. Leviticus, rather than being a book of laws, would be about discussing your feelings.
Cav wrote:
Quote:If the creator were female, she would have cleaned up the world already, knowing that the men weren't going to do it.
Who says women have to feel close in order to have sex? And who says they want the world to be clean? This is a myth propagated by silly men who feel it's un-manly to want closeness and tidiness.
It's an obvious ploy on the part of men to polarize these needs, law vs. feelings, etc. Once they have described ambivalence as mutually exclusive traits, men can then conveniently assign the feared wishes to women, thereby feeling safer, stronger and more in control than they really are. Like ostriches with their heads in the sand, they never seem to realize that they have their fannys in the breeze, just waiting for what ever treatment this stance provokes.
It's very hard to resist such opportunities.
Evil isn't it?