Rising fascism in the US

Michael McAuliff
@mmcauliff
Schumer defends Biden re China's balloon: "We got a far greater look at these balloons, which are relatively new. We didn't know about them, our military and our surveillance, NSA.. 3 of them went over when Trump was there. But you can't blame Trump because he didn't know."

What it looks like when honesty and integrity is displayed...

Quote:

Michael McAuliff
@mmcauliff
Schumer defends Biden re China's balloon: "We got a far greater look at these balloons, which are relatively new. We didn't know about them, our military and our surveillance, NSA.. 3 of them went over when Trump was there. But you can't blame Trump because he didn't know."

Weak-minded MAGADemocrats like Blatham were heavily propagandized for 7 years (immediately after Hillary Clinton’s crushing loss to Donald Trump) to accuse anyone questioning their political heroes as Russian or bots or secret Republicans. LOL. It actually happened. Blatham is probably the best representative of this phenomena on this site, although almost everyone on this site bought the fakery.

Here, he’s referring to me asking questions about the inconsistencies in a couple of police reports and strange media behavior around an incident at the Pelosi home in SF.

The trained behavior is apparent in his language

A bill in the state Legislature seeking to regulate science curriculum in public schools got its first hearing Monday. The legislation’s sponsor says by banning scientific theories, the policy aims to prevent kids from being taught things that aren’t true.

More than 20 people testified against Senate Bill 235, concerned that it could keep teachers from including gravitational theory, evolution and cell theory in curriculum.

Mia Taylor is a sophomore at Helena High School. She told the committee, "If we remove scientific theory from science curriculums, what can be taught will be limited. It is the school's job to educate its students."

The bill is sponsored by freshman Republican Senator Daniel Emrich from Great Falls. In his testimony, Emrich said the bill would make sure students are taught what a scientific fact is.

"If we operate on the assumption that a theory is fact, unfortunately, it leads us to asking questions that may be potentially based on false assumptions," Emrich said.

A legal note from legislative staff says the bill could overstep the Board of Public Education’s constitutional authority to oversee schools in the state.

The committee did not take immediate action on the bill.

Re: Lash (Post 7302607)

I had thought you were merely biased with skewed perspectives. But this behaviour / quote etcs, is a reflection on your level of personal honesty.

It's open season on education:

Bill would ban the teaching of scientific theories in Montana schools

She remembers the Genocide that was committed by woke China[/quote]

Re: blatham (Post 7302906)
Yet her response was like that of Oralloy's when his lies are caught out, denial and obfuscation.

Yet her response was like that of Oralloy's when his lies are caught out, denial and obfuscation.

I truly do not understand dishonesty at this level.

I truly do not understand it either but it does seem to be epidemic amongst Republicans?!!

I don't either, she's had absolutely zero success in convincing anyone she's not far right.
Other right wingers like Oralloy go along with it, but nobody believes her.

Quote:

Weak-minded MAGADemocrats like Blatham were heavily propagandized for 7 years (immediately after Hillary Clinton’s crushing loss to Donald Trump) to accuse anyone questioning their political heroes as Russian or bots or secret Republicans. LOL. It actually happened. Blatham is probably the best representative of this phenomena on this site, although almost everyone on this site bought the fakery.

Here, he’s referring to me asking questions about the inconsistencies in a couple of police reports and strange media behavior around an incident at the Pelosi home in SF.

The trained behavior is apparent in his language

Asking questions? That’s a very innocuous revision of history, where:


1. You very clearly made statements accusing the Pelosi’s of a gay coverup:
They were either naked or in underwear—admitted by cops

Quote:

In a police report

Nancy’s team has tried to cobble together a story that makes it look like this was politically motivated to cover for the fact that her horndog husband got sloppy with who he brought home

Quote:

A reasonable guess as to why the cops couldn’t get their stories straight in the first few days.

2. You very clearly implied they were lying to (or coercing) the cops
Some cop or security guard is going to refuse to file a bogus report to cover for them

Quote:

A reasonable assertion at conflicting police reports.

3. You clearly accused Pelosi of forcing police to lie
Pelosi is forcing law enforcement to lie.

Quote:

A reasonable assertion based on conflicting police reports.

4. You Plainly kept intimating they were lying
I’ll take a neighbor’s eyewitness account over someone who knows nothing— who says they know nothing— but who would be *afraid* to discredit the most powerful resident of California.

Quote:

Based on neighbor’s eyewitness account.

The official story makes even less sense. A malevolent Trump-fueled murder guy doesn’t allow bathroom breaks for calling 911. Paul Pelosi knew the guy’s name and said he was a friend to the dispatcher. Why did he call? To ward off a cop visit — because an alarm had been tripped? This makes NO sense.

Quote:

Based on police and dispatch reports.

….claiming the above statements were you merely 'asking questions' is a clear attempt to rewrite and downplay recorded history. Only (4) could be argued to be questions. The rest were clear statements / accusations.