29
   

Rising fascism in the US

 
 
hightor
 
  4  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 09:35 am
Looks like someone didn't bother to check his source before parroting them:

Fact Check: Myocarditis, Pericarditis Did NOT Increase Nearly Eightfold In Swindon, England, After COVID Shots Began

Quote:
Did the incidence of the heart conditions myocarditis and pericarditis increase nearly eightfold in the English town of Swindon after the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine? No, that's not true: The numbers, which were released through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, were initially misreported by the Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust due to an Excel spreadsheet "formula error." The corrected numbers were a small fraction of what was originally reported.

The claim appeared in a video on YouTube (archived here) by John Campbell that he recorded on January 6, 2023, under the title "Swindon data." The description for the video includes this information:

Totals for inflammatory heart disease [myocarditis and pericarditis]
2019 3,151 (baseline)
2020 12,267 (x 3.8)
(December 2020, UK covid vaccinations start)
2021 18,963 (x 6)
2022 24,642 (x 7.8)


This is what the video looked like on YouTube at the time of writing:

https://leadstories.com/assets_c/2023/01/Dr.%20John%20youtube-thumb-900xauto-3101759.png



Quote:
The original numbers can be found in a spreadsheet released on November 30, 2022, by the Trust (which is part of the National Health Service, the publicly funded health care system in England) in its FOIA response to a request by Shaun King. The image below matches Campbell's figures from his YouTube video and its description:

https://leadstories.com/assets_c/2023/01/First%20numbers-thumb-900x473-3101764.png
A day after the initial video from Campbell, the Trust issued a revision with a new spreadsheet showing the corrected numbers. This is what the Trust's response said:

Good Afternoon Shaun

Further to our response to this request which was provided on 30th November 2022, an error has been found in the figures that were originally provided in relation to ED attendances for Myocarditis and Pericarditis. This was a formula error that occurred during the process of simplifying the data into a pivot table. The value that was displayed was the sum total of a numeric value within the raw data, specifically a row count, as the years progressed the row count increased meaning the sum was greater. The value displayed should have been a count and not a sum.

I have provided the correct information in attached spreadsheet. Please accept my sincere apologies for this. Please be assured that this was a genuine error and that we have implemented an additional checking process for requests that ask for statistical information in the future.

Best Regards
Carole Sheppard
Freedom of Information Team
Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust


Here are the revised numbers as they appear in the updated spreadsheet from the Trust:

https://leadstories.com/assets_c/2023/01/revised%20numbers-thumb-900x432-3101773.png

The updated numbers are a small fraction of what was found in the original spreadsheet and do not show an increase in the two heart conditions. On January 7, 2023, Campbell published a new video on YouTube (archived here), noting the revised numbers. However, he did not pull down the original video with the incorrect information.

John Campbell

Campbell is a popular YouTube host with more than 2.6 million subscribers to his channel. Campbell is not a physician but a retired emergency department nurse. According to the About section of his YouTube channel, his Ph.D. "focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally." Since starting his channel in 2007, he has posted thousands of videos on a variety of medical topics but has focused primarily on COVID since the start of the pandemic, promoting unproven treatments like ivermectin, spreading misleading death statistics minimizing the number of victims and misinterpreting data about vaccine safety.

The About page (archived here) on Campbell's YouTube channel features a disclaimer that states:

These media including videos, book, e book, articles, podcasts are not peer-reviewed. They should never replace individual clinical judgement from your own health care provider. No media-based material on this channel is suitable for using as professional medical advice. All comments are also for educational purposed only and must never replace advice from your own health care provider.

leadstories
Lash
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 11:35 am
Sure.

0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 11:41 am
https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/longevity/588738-huge-huge-numbers-death-rates-up-40-percent-over-pre/amp/

‘Huge, huge numbers:’ insurance group sees death rates up 40 percent over pre-pandemic levels

By Shirin Ali | Jan. 7, 2022 | Jan. 07,2022
___________

One insurance company executive estimated that death rates are currently up 40 percent over what they were pre-pandemic.
As the pandemic enters its second year running, the number of deaths the virus has caused is likely much greater than official numbers indicate, setting a historic record.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) explains that excess deaths are associated with COVID-19 directly or indirectly, typically defined as the difference between the observed number of deaths in specific time periods and the expected number of deaths in the same time periods.

Currently, since Feb. 1, 2020, the CDC estimates there have been 942,431 excess deaths in the U.S.

That’s a staggering amount, as J Scott Davison, CEO of insurance company OneAmerica, explained during a health care conference organized by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce this week. Davison said that his company is seeing the highest death rates now than he’s ever seen before since he started in the insurance business.

OneAmerica offers employers across the country group life insurance, which generally covers people 18 to 64-years-old.

Even more alarming is where those death rates are hitting, with Davison saying it’s primarily among working aged people between the ages of 18 and 64 who are covered by OneAmerica’s group life policies. The insurance company says that’s similar to what the rest of the group life industry is seeing and is consistent with CDC data.
_______________

And this?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 12:09 pm
@hightor,
hightor wrote:


Looks like someone didn't bother to check his source before parroting them:




So in response, Lash wrote: "There's just no pleasing them."

And after you rebutted the supposed information she posted in rebuttal to you, she wrote, "Sure."

She was correct. There just is no pleasing some people.

Her, for one.

And now she seems to be attributing the higher death rate to the vaccines. Is there any possibility that the higher death rate came from Covid...rather than the vaccines used to combat it?

hightor
 
  3  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 12:16 pm
@Frank Apisa,
I wonder if fentanyl was taken into account as well?

0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 01:01 pm
@hightor,
*Only after an FOIA* are numbers —that should be public without request— released.

Why is that?

Then, whoops! Er um. Disregard those numbers. *cough cough* Here, take these new numbers.

You are welcomed to believe what you will.
A glut of information that was suppressed previously is being released.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 01:09 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:



You are welcomed to believe what you will.



Said without a hint of irony.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 01:11 pm
@Glennn,
This has got to be the greatest psyop in the history of the world.
Glennn
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 01:23 pm
@Lash,
It is!

That you can't shake their faith in proven liars is a testament to the effectiveness of the show. Worse, they react badly to anyone who doesn't share that unjustified faith in known liars, attacking them for pointing out that they've been lied to.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 03:17 pm
The truth is out there.
Glennn
 
  -2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 03:19 pm
@InfraBlue,
What do you mean it's out there? It's right in here.

What is your unjustified faith in liars based on?
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 03:43 pm
@Glennn,
Where is here.?

Still beating your wife?
Glennn
 
  -1  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 03:52 pm
@InfraBlue,
Yes, it was a trick question, wasn't it? How could you possibly justify putting your faith in liars? Of course, this just begs the question of why you do.
InfraBlue
 
  3  
Tue 10 Jan, 2023 04:01 pm
@Glennn,
So, you're still beating your wife. 10-4.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Wed 11 Jan, 2023 08:15 am
Garland Nixon and Scott Ritter discussing Solodar.

https://youtu.be/cG5OOzJIbCM

0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Wed 11 Jan, 2023 09:31 am
Russia Russia Russia
A democrat construct.
https://youtu.be/baFTYloKpCI
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Wed 11 Jan, 2023 09:54 am
@Lash,
Two days ago, there was a report about that in the WP:
Russian trolls on Twitter had little influence on 2016 voters

Quote:
Key findings of the report:

• Only 1 percent of Twitter users accounted for 70 percent of the exposure to accounts that Twitter identified as Russian troll accounts.
• Highly partisan Republicans were exposed to nine times more posts than non-Republicans.
• Content from the news media and U.S. politicians dwarfed the amount of Russian influence content the electorate was exposed to during the 2016 race.
• There was no measurable impact on “political attitudes, polarization, and vote preferences and behavior” from the Russian accounts and posts.


Study: Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior
hightor
 
  2  
Wed 11 Jan, 2023 10:07 am
Quote:
A democrat construct.


Typical bait and switch.

The effectiveness of the cyber warfare conducted by Russia and Eastern European trolls or the data mining of Cambridge Analytica isn't the issue. How would it even be measured? However, the fact that disinformation was spread by hostile parties in an effort to disrupt the US elections (and elections in the Europe) and that social media platforms were appropriated for the effort is not in dispute.

https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/nationalpost/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/screen-shot-2017-11-02-at-12-25-33-pm.png?quality=90&strip=all&w=564&type=webphttps://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/nationalpost/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/vets.png?w=564&quality=90&strip=all&type=webp

I have a pretty low opinion of the average voter's critical thinking skills but, really, how many people would change their vote because of these sorts of ads? This crap is primarily consumed by those already primed to agree with it. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be exposed for what it is – election meddling.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Wed 11 Jan, 2023 10:49 am
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/white-house-covid-censorship-twitter-facebook/

01/10/23

Biden Officials ‘Relentless’ in Pressuring Social Media Companies to Censor COVID Content
The authors of a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Sunday called out the “relentless, coercive pressure” the White House put on social media companies to censor COVID-19-related information that contradicted the government and mainstream media narrative.
Lash
 
  -1  
Wed 11 Jan, 2023 10:51 am
@Walter Hinteler,
We should tell Hillary!
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.21 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 04:55:50