@joefromchicago,
You were right earlier when you pointed out that this is going to turn into another debate about moral absolutism. There is an interesting question if the ideology of feminism is possible without moral absolutism.
You probably already know the answer I will give for this (and you will likely disagree with it, as you have in previous discussions).
Western values are the correct values in a Western cultural setting. Our values are designed to function inside of our own society. The vast majority of us share roughly the same values (a very narrrow range of values compared to all of the other cultures).
Any person who was raised in a Western culture will feel very strongly that these values are the only way to do thing.
I don't think we can say any more than that.
Of course, someone raised in a non-Western culture will have equally strong beliefs about what is correct that will conflict with our beliefs.
The question is what happens when two very different cultures come into contact with each other. The people will disagree greatly, and everyone will have the same certainty that you do. How do you decide who is correct and who is wrong?
In reality, what happens if that
the culture with the best guns wins. Western European culture has the best guns... and you have the ability to ignore the fact that other human beings disagree with you because your culture can impose itself on everyone else.
All I am saying that as members of the dominant culture, we should at least be honest about why we are right and everyone else is wrong.