40
   

I'll Never Vote for Hillary Clinton

 
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 01:04 pm
@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:
Nice tautology. If she were not to become who she is then she wouldn't be who she is.

Ask me sometime to explain to you what a tautology is.

DrewDad wrote:
Edit, with better phrasing: If only she weren't Hillary Clinton then she wouldn't be Hillary Clinton.

Indeed. She'd be Hillary Rodham.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 01:07 pm
@joefromchicago,
and as I posted in the other thread, we studied Hillary Clinton's work on child advocacy years before we heard of Bill Clinton, so your whole nobody would have heard of her shtick is just that, shtick. People had already heard of her before he became a thing.


if she hadn't thrown in with him, I believe we would have continued to hear/read a lot more from / about her . They made a choice to push his political career rather than hers initially. He's a good-looking political schmoozer. She's the smart wonk.
revelette2
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 01:12 pm
@ehBeth,
Needless to say I disagree with both of you. I think both have strengths and weaknesses and you underestimate Bill Clinton's by a long shot; something I am glad Hillary does not do.
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  2  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 01:18 pm
Sanders vows to work with Clinton as Dems move toward party unity
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 01:20 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

and as I posted in the other thread, we studied Hillary Clinton's work on child advocacy years before we heard of Bill Clinton, so your whole nobody would have heard of her shtick is just that, shtick. People had already heard of her before he became a thing.

I'll admit that when I used the phrase "nobody would have heard of her," I failed to make it clear that I was using it in a figurative sense. Of course, I recognize that she wouldn't have been totally unknown. Her family, friends, neighbors, fellow students, teachers, co-workers, other acquaintances, and a circle of persons within her chosen profession would also have heard of her. I should have known that, by saying "nobody would have heard of her," I was leaving myself open to the risk that somebody would take it literally and say something like "I knew her in the third grade! She gave me a stick of gum!" So let me amend my previous statement and say that, if she hadn't married Bill Clinton, she would not be as well-known as she is today.
sozobe
 
  3  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 01:56 pm
@joefromchicago,
She wouldn't be exactly who she is today if she hadn't married Bill Clinton, no. But that observation doesn't lead to the conclusion that she's unqualified, either.

There are convincing cases for alternative histories to be made where she achieved this status without having had a political husband of any sort, but lacking access to alternate timelines, we're unable to confirm or deny those possible outcomes.

Leaving the only pertinent question: Do you think that as of right now, she is unqualified for the presidency?
engineer
 
  4  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 01:59 pm
@sozobe,
To start this thread, joefromchicago wrote:
Set aside for the moment Hillary Clinton's questionable ethics, her weather-vane shifts in position, her eagerness to use force in foreign affairs, the taint that still clings to her from her husband's presidency and its regressive policies -- all that could be forgiven. But I cannot forgive Clinton for her vote in favor of the Iraq War. ...

But giving George W. Bush and his fellow brigands the authority to invade a country that posed no threat, in full violation of international law, was the sort of enormous, mind-boggling mistake that automatically disqualified her (and every on of her colleagues who voted along with her) from ever holding higher office.

This morning, joefromchicago wrote:
She is manifestly unqualified for president.
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  4  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:03 pm
@joefromchicago,
... And, conversely, neither would Bill C. beCome as well-known as he was if it weren't for her. She contributed a lot to his campaigns and terms as President.?They're Clinton Incorporated .
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:08 pm
@sozobe,
sozobe wrote:

She wouldn't be exactly who she is today if she hadn't married Bill Clinton, no. But that observation doesn't lead to the conclusion that she's unqualified, either.

I never made that conclusion.

sozobe wrote:
Leaving the only pertinent question: Do you think that as of right now, she is unqualified for the presidency?

Indeed. She disqualified herself when she voted in favor of dragging the US into a war led by Bush Jr. and his merry band of nincompoops.
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:09 pm
@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:

... And neither would Bill C. beCome as well-known as he was if it weren't for her. She contributed a lot to his campaigns and terms as President.?They're Clinton Incorporated .

You say that like it's a good thing.
sozobe
 
  3  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:15 pm
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:

sozobe wrote:

She wouldn't be exactly who she is today if she hadn't married Bill Clinton, no. But that observation doesn't lead to the conclusion that she's unqualified, either.

I never made that conclusion.


Good. 'Cause it doesn't follow. (What ARE you arguing re: where she'd be if she hadn't married Bill? Does it have any bearing on anything?)

joefromchicago wrote:
She disqualified herself when she voted in favor of dragging the US into a war led by Bush Jr. and his merry band of nincompoops.


OK. That's at least arguable, unlike this alternative-history thing you had going. My argument would be: Yeah, that sucked, and I don't like it. I don't find it disqualifying though, especially since I wouldn't vote for someone I find unqualified for the presidency and I'm unwilling to contribute in any way to the election of someone I find truly unqualified -- Donald Trump.
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:22 pm
@sozobe,
sozobe wrote:
Good. 'Cause it doesn't follow. (What ARE you arguing re: where she'd be if she hadn't married Bill? Does it have any bearing on anything?)

See this post.

sozobe wrote:
OK. That's at least arguable, unlike this alternative-history thing you had going. My argument would be: Yeah, that sucked, and I don't like it. I don't find it disqualifying though, especially since I wouldn't vote for someone I find unqualified for the presidency and I'm unwilling to contribute in any way to the election of someone I find truly unqualified -- Donald Trump.

They're equally unqualified, albeit for very different reasons.
sozobe
 
  3  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:27 pm
@joefromchicago,
I see.

That still comes back around, though -- it's impossible to say for sure whether she would have been in a position to work hard and form relationships (which I agree has been important in her continued rise in the 15 years since she left the White House) if she had or hadn't married Bill Clinton.

So, you're comfortable just sitting this one out and if Trump wins, oh well?
engineer
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:39 pm
@sozobe,
He's answered that here.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:41 pm
@sozobe,
sozobe wrote:
So, you're comfortable just sitting this one out and if Trump wins, oh well?

I always vote. I consider it my civic burden. And if Trump wins, well, then he wins. That's how elections work.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:44 pm
@joefromchicago,
I find this typical of JoeFromChicago.

He says a few things that are similar, but not exactly the same, and then dodges back and forth claiming you're misunderstanding and/or misquoting him.

Take these two items:
joefromchicago wrote:
If she were just Jane Schmoe, valedictorian of the Wellesley class of 1969, nobody would have ever heard of her. After all, do you know who the valedictorian of the Wellesley class of 1970 was? Thought not.


joefromchicago wrote:

Lots of people work hard and make relationships, but they aren't married to a former president.


Both statements snidely hinting that she's unqualified, but never stating it explicitly or giving a reason why.
Robert Gentel
 
  2  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 02:48 pm
@sozobe,
His vote doesn't matter anyway, all his state's electoral votes will go to Hillary regardless of who he votes for because it is winner take all. I don't get all the handwringing from progressives about Joe's position in this thread, it's not like he lives in a swing state.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 03:06 pm
There have been many many posts on this thread explaining why some of us consider her unqualified. It's not like the pro Hillary posters here just dropped in from Albania. and didn't get the chance to know these reasons long ago. Iraq and Libya are just the beginning. But it does not matter. A person could go back and round up the best such posts and present them all here, and the pro Hillary would be asking for our reasons within a day or two.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 04:29 pm
@joefromchicago,
Quote Ragman:
Quote:
... And neither would Bill C. beCome as well-known as he was if it weren't for her. She contributed a lot to his campaigns and terms as President.?They're Clinton Incorporated .


Quote joefromchicago:
Quote:
You say that like it's a good thing.

It obviously is. 16 Million Full Time jobs created in 8 years, a murder rate that was absolutely skyrocketing when Clinton took office and it not only levels off, it drops 36%. Looks pretty good from here.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 04:38 pm
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:
Her family, friends, neighbors, fellow students, teachers, co-workers, other acquaintances, and a circle of persons within her chosen profession would also have heard of her.


and all three or four people who read Life magazine in 1969

yup

it's likely she'd have been an unknown Rolling Eyes


__

she's not a candidate I'd pick for the Democrats, but she's the one who got the popular vote in the party's primary, in part because of her qualifications unrelated to marriage to Mr. Clinton

hopefully there are some significantly younger candidates coming up through the ranks
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 01:43:29