40
   

I'll Never Vote for Hillary Clinton

 
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 05:24 pm
@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:

I find this typical of JoeFromChicago....

Both statements snidely hinting that she's unqualified, but never stating it explicitly or giving a reason why.

I'll leave to other, more acute readers to discern what I meant to say.
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 05:26 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
and all three or four people who read Life magazine in 1969

yup

it's likely she'd have been an unknown Rolling Eyes

Do you know who else was profiled in that issue of Life?

No?

Didn't think so Rolling Eyes
revelette2
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 05:43 pm
@joefromchicago,
One thing about the Iraq war vote, Kerry and Clinton voted on a process and the Bush administration ignored that process and rushed to war right in the middle of the UN inspections. If there had been WMD and if the UN decided to go to war, in voting for the war, Bush had the authority to go do it along with other nations. However, that wasn't how it went down as Kerry tried unsuccessfully to explain in 2004.

Anatomy of a Smear Video

I don't really know if Hillary had similar views on it or if she came to see the Iraq war as wrong long after most already had or not.
Lash
 
  -1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 07:42 pm
@snood,
He was a liberal. You're not.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 07:44 pm
@snood,
The GOP doesn't have super delegates.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 07:48 pm
@revelette2,
Yea, I remember that when Bush chased out the UN weapon's inspectors to start his war.
I wrote to Senator Feinstein not to approve the war, but she told me with the information they had, they had to approve the war. SHE WAS WRONG! No WMDs.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 08:00 pm
@snood,
Yeah. All the so-called disenfranchised need to get over it, huh?
snood
 
  3  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 08:07 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

Yeah. All the so-called disenfranchised need to get over it, huh?

Which of the two of us promised the other to rub our candidate's victory in the other's smug face?
Why don't you give it a fricking rest, Lash?
Lash
 
  -1  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 08:13 pm
@RABEL222,
I'll buy your ticket.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Thu 9 Jun, 2016 10:54 pm
@sozobe,
I thought alternative histories were infinite so on some other time line she would be president and Lash would be her Vicepresident.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 05:03 am
@DrewDad,
Quote:
2) Our govenment is not a true democracy. It's a representative democracy.


It's an oligarchy.

Quote:
Get over it, already.


Wake up and smell the BS.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 05:07 am
@snood,
Quote:
That doesn't take away from the fact that her candidacy can still be an inspiration to a generation of women.


Are you still believing that she is the first?

She's not an inspiration, either, unless being a lying theiving bitch is what you aspire to.
engineer
 
  3  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 06:03 am
@Builder,
Many women know that as they become more successful, there will be people who attribute their success to them being lying, thieving bitches. Clinton inspires by succeeding anyway.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 06:15 am
@snood,
I don't think either of us did that. I think I promised to rub her warmongering, TPP pushing, fracking and Republican behavior in your face when she inevitably dances back to the right.
snood
 
  4  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 06:21 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

I don't think either of us did that. I think I promised to rub her warmongering, TPP pushing, fracking and Republican behavior in your face when she inevitably dances back to the right.

Oh, Lash don't be a lying...........

Do you need me to find the post where you said "I can't wait for when Bernie wins, so I can rub it in your smug face?" Are you actually going to deny saying that now? Why don't you just own all your empty bitterness? After all, with Bernie joining the Hillary team,your petulant whining is all you're going to have to offer to discussions on this election anyway.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 07:11 am
@joefromchicago,
joefromchicago wrote:

I'll leave to other, more acute readers to discern what I meant to say.

...and then you stand around saying, "tell me where I said that" and try to impugn their honesty.


Anyone who doesn't clearly and accurately state their opinion is either unable to do so, in which case I don't have a very high opinion of their reasoning skills, or is unwilling to do so, in which case I don't have a very high opinion of their character.

Until you're ready to stop playing word games and "who, me? did I do that?" you're not really worth engaging.



And I don't have any high hopes of you changing your ways. I just hope people will start calling you on your ****.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 07:12 am
@snood,
Never wrestle with a pig....
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 07:21 am
@snood,
Yes. I'd like to see. It doesn't sound like me. I'll definitely apologize if I'm wrong.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 07:26 am
@joefromchicago,
Incorrect. I knew Ira Magaziner was covered in the same profile.
Lash
 
  0  
Fri 10 Jun, 2016 07:31 am
@snood,
Calling Hillary Clinton on her crap is no more "empty bitterness" than when you express disagreement with something. The overwhelming compulsion to attack me for it is your problem.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 10:00:42