@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:Your entire argument about pistol grips is sophistry of the most unmitigated sort.
"That you cannot provide any justification for outlawing pistol grips" is a fact, and there is no sophistry in pointing out this fact.
MontereyJack wrote:it has always been pure nonsense.
"That you cannot provide any justification for outlawing pistol grips" is a fact.
While progressives do have a very strong dislike for facts, facts are not nonsense.
MontereyJack wrote:The weapons are the means for murderous denials of american civil rights,
Adding a pistol grip to a weapon causes no murder and denies no rights.
MontereyJack wrote:not the grips.
Your word games are sophistry.
"Outlawing a weapon whenever a pistol grip is added to it" is the same thing as "outlawing pistol grips on that kind of weapon."
MontereyJack wrote:the essentially unrestricted weapons whose proliferation you vociferously defend are the means to violate constitutional rights,
Having a pistol grip on a gun violates no constitutional rights.
The only violations of constitutional rights here are your attempts to outlaw pistol grips.
MontereyJack wrote:not the grips.
Your word games are sophistry.
"Outlawing a weapon whenever a pistol grip is added to it" is the same thing as "outlawing pistol grips on that kind of weapon."
