The Case For Biden

Here’s another question for you Do you know where you can stick this whole goofy exchange? You must be stupid or you think I am. Because anyone else reading this would not be confused about what I was asking or who I was asking it about. I understand though, why you have to play dumb. It can’t be easy to defend Bernie’s wishy washy stance on Venezuela, for one thing.

Hilarious. You start the half-assed thing, refuse to even say wtf you’re talking about, and then get twisted like I’m at fault.

Check yourself for Alzheimer’s.

Bernie’s against military involvement in Venezuela and pro-Jacobsons vacation plans.

When and how did anyone named Jacobson or anything about his vacation plans involve itself in my question about Bernie and Venezuela?

You should check for Alzheimer’s and dementia. You’re older.

I don't think we have a military presence in Venezuela do we? Are you asking if Bernie Sanders thinks we should break ties with the current government and pull our diplomates out of the Embassy there?

If you trace this thread back one page, you’ll see that brand x disparages Biden’s judgement by saying he should want the US not just out of Yemen, but out of Venezuela as well. Lash immediately jumps in to sneer that the reason for that’s because there’s oil in Venezuela.

Which prompted me to ask her hero Bernie’s view on the matter - whether we should be in, or out of Venezuela. If it’s an important enough to smear Biden about, it seemed reasonable to ask where Saint Bernie stands. For some reason, from that point on, no one has seemed to be able to understand what’s being said about who.

Lash said my question is bizarre. I think the reaction to my question is what’s bizarre, and I am over trying to explain it.

For the record, Biden is NOT my first, or even my second, pick to be the nominee. The thing is, I’m of the mind that we Democrats can ill afford to be ruling anyone out right now. I’ll support Bernie or Biden or even Tulsi fricking Gabbard if they are the nominee. My defense of Biden is because of that, not from the belief that all of his baggage means nothing.

It’s impossible to answer if you don’t know who exactly he’s talking about.

This is not true. Just a bold lie because the proof is on this thread.

I answered the question, he said that’s not what he was asking—and he REFUSES to clarify.

That IS bizarre.

You’re a liar. And a not very convincing one.

If you find yourself confused about what’s been said on the thread, don’t take Lash’s word for it. Or mine, for that matter. Read over it for yourself.

I invite anyone to read back, see that I answered, he said I didn’t, I asked for clarification, and he refused.

Lash is doing what she always does when caught in an untruth. She attacks and insults. That's one of the reasons I don't text with her. She is an Ollie lite.

That would explain a lot. But she’s not just caught in an untruth- she is an untruth. Pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-liberal, pseudo-educator, pseudo everything.

Where’s the attack?

Oh, I didn't get the connection to Brandx post. Sorry, carry on. We aren't even in Venezuela militarily (yet.) So Brandx post was a red herring to start with. Feel slow.

Lash wrote:


That’s the other thing she does when called on her pejorative nastiness:
Who? Lil’ ole me?!

Rabel, I see plenty of attacks and insults from snood. You must have him on ignore.

Where was my attack? I’ll be happy to point out snood’s attacks for you, since attacks and insults are so important to you.

What is Bernie’s wishy-washy stance on Venezuela?

You must be demented to be asking me what I think about Robertson’s vacation time. Come back when you figure out who you’re asking about and how that is relevant to the original question.

You refuse to clarify your question.
I know of no US entity currently in Venezuela. I don’t think you do either. You’re just ******* around, and I’m not playing.