@maporsche,
maporsche wrote:I'm just not ready to ruin the career of somebody for something like this.
I think there's a lot of subconscious assumptions of entitlement in the "if you won't let him win the US Presidency, you are literally
ruining his career" stuff.
The man was a US Senator for 36 years. He was Vice President for 8 years. He was able to have that by any definition long and illustrious career despite his arguably all too gropy behaviour around people, which people had been grumbling about for a while already before Flores brought it to the foreground.
Literally the only consequence might be that he might not end up occupying the most powerful elected office of the world. Does that really qualify as "ruining the career of somebody"? It's the most powerful elected office of the world. Is it really that unjust to apply the highest standards to who deserves it as well (even if the Republicans obviously won't)?
Mind, I don't even really have all that strong opinions about Biden's case. He's not being accused of anything remotely as bad as Trump's done. I don't doubt he never meant any ill. I don't doubt there are many women who actually appreciated his style. But I also don't doubt other women have found it inappropriate, uncomfortable and unprofessional. And I think they have as much a right to speak up about that as anyone.
I find the argument credible that the fact he never meant ill, but never came upon any reason to stop to rethink his behaviour, is itself a manifestation of the kind of problematic privilege powerful men have enjoyed. And that it's a good thing that this is being called out now. At the same time I find the argument plausible that there's also just a bit of a generation clash at work here, with changing mores. And personally I also feel a bit nonplussed about just how averse Americans tend to be of casual physical touch -- how large the personal space is they require -- compared to many other cultures, and find it a bit problematic how explicitly gendered the extent of that phenomenon is. I.e. many women hug each other fine, even in work settings, but when it comes to men/men and men/women relations, there's an aversion that seems to hint at ... issues, when I compare it with eg how people around here behave.
So, all in all, I'm personally pretty ambivalent. But I take the outrage about "ruining his career" with a pinch of salt. When I see calls for people being fired from every day jobs because they have offensive views, I have hesitations. Like, for random example, I saw a case a couple of years ago about a woman who had a doubtlessly very low-wage job selling snacks at football games, and it turned out she expressed extreme-right, racist views online (IIRC), and people were agitating for her to be fired. That kind of thing gives me pause... like, however horrible someone's views are, literally condemning them to life on welfare by getting them fired from even the most precarious and irrelevant of jobs seems.. unhelpful.
But "famous, wealthy politician with a life-long successful career in the top political elechons of the world's most powerful country might not get to realize his dream of becoming President of the USA", we're supposed to cry tears about ruining his career, really? It's the highest imaginable office, people have seen their presidential bids quashed over all kinds of personal flaws and peccadilloes, I don't see why it would be such an injustice if "a life-long tendency of touching people in a way many found uncomfortable and inappropriate" would be it for him.