33
   

The Case For Biden

 
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Wed 3 Apr, 2019 03:21 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:

You keep saying "career."
And what career is that, exactly?


Politician. Potential Presidential candidate. Potential President. Potential ex-president.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  0  
Wed 3 Apr, 2019 04:55 pm
@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:

maporsche wrote:
One might also go so far as to say that they care very much about #metoo but don't think what Biden has done rises to the level of a #metoo moment.

Bingo.
People seem to think they can just weaponize #metoo to ruin people's careers.... That's not how it works.

So far, both in business and in government, it does indeed work that way. Hard to see how you believe otherwise.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 12:02 am
@RABEL222,
FAUX doesn't matter, in this case. The debate is on the left. The reason I believe his candidacy is toast is that respectable news sources on the left or center, such as the NYT, will keep looking into his past and dig more of the same stuff, and many dem-leaning women and men will take note.

Don't get me wrong. I like Biden. If he was good enough to be Obama's VP, he's good enough for me. But in the current context on the US left, these sorts of accusations are lethal.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 03:17 am
@DrewDad,
Quote:
People seem to think they can just weaponize #metoo to ruin people's careers.... That's not how it works.

Tell that to Al Franken.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 05:20 am
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  4  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 05:24 am
The Biden Sort-Of Lovefest

If you don’t want to vote for him, at least buy a mug.

Quote:
One of the great political themes of the Democratic presidential campaign is how much everybody loves Joe Biden.

Really. Just Google “I love Joe Biden.” Go past the T-shirts and memorial coffee cups and you’ll see a ton of stuff.

“I love Joe Biden. He’s a great guy and a great politician,” said Jerry Shriner, a Democratic National Committee member from Idaho, when the question of a Biden return came up. “I wish he were the president right now. But I’m not sure I wish he is president in 2021.”

“I love Joe Biden. I really do,” said Tom Courtney, a Democratic leader in Iowa. “But there comes a moment when it’s time to not run.”

In the past, whenever Biden has tried to run for president, things didn’t go well. In part it’s been because of his tendency to sound … goofy. In 2007, he described one of his opponents, Barack Obama, as the “first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

He didn’t mean it the way it sounded, but he still finished fifth in the Iowa caucuses. He dropped out and became vice president. When asked about Biden as a possible successor, Obama just said, “I love Joe Biden.”

Now, Biden seems ready to give it one more shot. He hasn’t announced yet, but he’s ahead in the polls. And thrashing around in the controversy over his longstanding habit of affectionately putting his hands all over women he meets.

“Social norms are changing,” said the former vice president via Twitter. It was not quite an apology. More like: “O.K., O.K. I’ll do it another way.”

Well, remember that old movie line about how love means never having to say you’re sorry?

On Wednesday, Biden sent out a video promising the world he’d be “more mindful and respectful of people’s personal space.” It was a pretty good presentation. He managed to look fairly normal, all things considered. When you’ve spent a week being savaged for old-uncle-creepiness, it’s easy to get a little self-conscious.

“I worked my whole life to empower women,” he told the camera “ … so the idea that I can’t adjust to the fact that personal space is important, more important than it’s ever been, is just not thinkable. I will. I will.”

Two problems here. One is that Biden is acting as though the whole don’t-touch business is a brand-new product of the #MeToo movement. That a person in his position could have accidentally missed the message until recently.

Let’s go back to 2006. At a G-8 summit in Russia, President George W. Bush came up behind German leader Angela Merkel and inflicted a quick back rub. Merkel appeared … grossed out. The picture went around the world. Comedians had a field day. Hard to believe a powerful U.S. senator with an expertise in foreign affairs could have missed the story.

A few months earlier, New Mexico Lt. Gov. Diane Denish had told a reporter she tried to avoid being around the governor, Bill Richardson, because “He pokes me. He pinches my neck. He touches my hip, my thigh, sort of the side of my leg.” Like Biden, Richardson was a Democratic presidential hopeful.

People were talking about it a lot. “Have our leaders gone mad?” demanded a Times writer, who traced the new touchy-feely trend to political consultants like Republican Frank Luntz, who were trying to create more human interaction between their clients and the public.

Luntz was indeed encouraging his clients to go beyond the traditional handshake when it came to making contact. These days, he’s still consulting but he’s pretty clear that times have changed. “What used to be seen as a demonstration of endearment is now seen as invasion of space,” he said in a phone interview. Nevertheless, he loves Joe Biden. (“One of the warmest people I’ve ever met.”)

Second problem with Biden’s video pitch. He has indeed worked to empower women — he was an author of the Violence Against Women Act. But he also has that really nasty history on the Anita Hill matter. Hill had the courage to show up and testify before the world about Clarence Thomas’s lecherous behavior as a boss. This was in 1991, when no one ever talked about that stuff in public. And Biden, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, did nothing but ask her embarrassing questions. (“Were you uncomfortable, were you embarrassed, did it not concern you?”)

He’s been trying to make amends, without really taking responsibility. (“I am so sorry if she believes that … I am so sorry that she had to go through what she went through.”)

Maybe that’s why he made a particular point of lacing into Donald Trump’s history of grabbing women’s private parts. Last year Biden told some college students that if only he and Trump were in high school together, “I’d take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.”

At the time, I wrote a column about the inadvisability of advocating an assault on the president, even in the past tense. And the next day Biden called up to say thanks “for showing me what a jerk I was.”

See, this is the reason people keep saying they love Joe Biden. Right before they say they hope he doesn’t run for president.

collins/nyt
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  5  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 10:58 am
@maporsche,
maporsche wrote:
I'm just not ready to ruin the career of somebody for something like this.

I think there's a lot of subconscious assumptions of entitlement in the "if you won't let him win the US Presidency, you are literally ruining his career" stuff.

The man was a US Senator for 36 years. He was Vice President for 8 years. He was able to have that by any definition long and illustrious career despite his arguably all too gropy behaviour around people, which people had been grumbling about for a while already before Flores brought it to the foreground.

Literally the only consequence might be that he might not end up occupying the most powerful elected office of the world. Does that really qualify as "ruining the career of somebody"? It's the most powerful elected office of the world. Is it really that unjust to apply the highest standards to who deserves it as well (even if the Republicans obviously won't)?

Mind, I don't even really have all that strong opinions about Biden's case. He's not being accused of anything remotely as bad as Trump's done. I don't doubt he never meant any ill. I don't doubt there are many women who actually appreciated his style. But I also don't doubt other women have found it inappropriate, uncomfortable and unprofessional. And I think they have as much a right to speak up about that as anyone.

I find the argument credible that the fact he never meant ill, but never came upon any reason to stop to rethink his behaviour, is itself a manifestation of the kind of problematic privilege powerful men have enjoyed. And that it's a good thing that this is being called out now. At the same time I find the argument plausible that there's also just a bit of a generation clash at work here, with changing mores. And personally I also feel a bit nonplussed about just how averse Americans tend to be of casual physical touch -- how large the personal space is they require -- compared to many other cultures, and find it a bit problematic how explicitly gendered the extent of that phenomenon is. I.e. many women hug each other fine, even in work settings, but when it comes to men/men and men/women relations, there's an aversion that seems to hint at ... issues, when I compare it with eg how people around here behave.

So, all in all, I'm personally pretty ambivalent. But I take the outrage about "ruining his career" with a pinch of salt. When I see calls for people being fired from every day jobs because they have offensive views, I have hesitations. Like, for random example, I saw a case a couple of years ago about a woman who had a doubtlessly very low-wage job selling snacks at football games, and it turned out she expressed extreme-right, racist views online (IIRC), and people were agitating for her to be fired. That kind of thing gives me pause... like, however horrible someone's views are, literally condemning them to life on welfare by getting them fired from even the most precarious and irrelevant of jobs seems.. unhelpful.

But "famous, wealthy politician with a life-long successful career in the top political elechons of the world's most powerful country might not get to realize his dream of becoming President of the USA", we're supposed to cry tears about ruining his career, really? It's the highest imaginable office, people have seen their presidential bids quashed over all kinds of personal flaws and peccadilloes, I don't see why it would be such an injustice if "a life-long tendency of touching people in a way many found uncomfortable and inappropriate" would be it for him.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  4  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 11:46 am
@maporsche,
maporsche wrote:

I don't think anyone has accused Joe of anything inappropriate in private. Which leads credence to his claim of (paraphrasing) "I didn't know this was inappropriate." - the fact that he does it to men, women, and in public, and it apparently has no sexual connotation or harassment (according to the accusers themselves).

I think you are minimizing this behavior. He does not do this to men. There are no male politicians in their 30's saying that Biden smelled his hair and kissed his on the head unless he is recalling a story from when he was eight. That he does this in public just means that he feels entitled to do so. That he does it to people over whom he has some clout as opposed to strangers he meets on the bus is telling and not in a good way. Do I think that Biden was getting a sexual thrill here? No. Do I think Biden should be taken out back and shot? No. Do I think these women should speak up and say stop this, this is not alright, what is wrong with you? Yes. Do I think Biden should be forbidden from running? No. Do I think that a number of women who have experienced such behavior in their lives will find Biden a less than desirable primary candidate? Yes. Do I think it would matter in a general election? Clearly not given the current President.

As for "me too", these women have every right to stand up and say "this man did this creepy thing and it was wrong" and be believed and not have their stories downplayed or ignored. Hopefully every other guy who thinks this is ok will get a clue.
maporsche
 
  2  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 11:53 am
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

Do I think that Biden was getting a sexual thrill here? No.
Do I think Biden should be taken out back and shot? No.
Do I think these women should speak up and say stop this, this is not alright, what is wrong with you? Yes.
Do I think Biden should be forbidden from running? No.
Do I think that a number of women who have experienced such behavior in their lives will find Biden a less than desirable primary candidate? Yes.
Do I think it would matter in a general election? Clearly not given the current President.


We completely agree here. I've said as much on this thread. There are others here, and in the broader world, that think Joe Biden should be denied the ability to run and I've seen on Twitter (which is full of idiots, admittedly) that the Democratic party should kick him out.

Quote:

As for "me too", these women have every right to stand up and say "this man did this creepy thing and it was wrong" and be believed and not have their stories downplayed or ignored.


Here we also agree. No one is not believing these women (how can we when there is video and photographic evidence of his behavior).

No one is ignoring them either, it's all over the news. I certainly have not said anything negative about these women and I've said repeatedly that they should speak up and Joe should listen.


I saw a woman journalist on TV the other day (I'm sorry, I don't remember her name) and she asked if it was ok for people to question the motives of those who've spoken out (it appears most (if not all) of them are Sanders supporters). She also said, while stating that they should of course be listened to and believed, but that it's also true that they could be #meTOOLS in someone's political toolbox. I thought it was an interesting thought; not sure I agree, but it's interesting.
engineer
 
  4  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 12:59 pm
@maporsche,
While no one is "not believing", a lot of people are minimizing: "that's how they did it in Joe's day", "it's not like it is sexual assualt", "Joe does that to everyone", "you're helping Republicans", "you're going to ruin Joe's career". All those comments are effectively say "stay quiet" which is the problem in the first place. If someone had given Joe a hard reality check thirty years ago, we wouldn't be here today, but "that's just Joe being Joe, keep it to yourself" and "the senator is a good guy who does good stuff for women so stay quiet" were the lines and Joe never got the feedback he needed. There is no need to run to Biden's defense here.

Joe, you don't put your hands on strangers and kiss their heads. Stop doing that.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 01:34 pm
Have you all noticed none of this stuff was shouted from the housetops until it became apparent that Joe was running for president? Republican damage control through their smear campaigns.
maporsche
 
  2  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 01:49 pm
@engineer,
I think you're right on several fronts. But, this is how it was done in Joe's day (and how it's still done today in many instances). The MeToo movement has brought A LOT of things to light for all men (myself included) in the last 2 years. This is wonderful and great and should continue until the end of time. All women should speak up and all of them should be believed and all charges should be investigated.

I've learned things from #metoo. Should I be flogged and punished because I didn't know those things before the last couple of years?

I'm not defending Joe's behavior with the women. I'm not.

I'm saying that I don't think this behavior should keep Joe from running for president if he chooses. Others ARE saying that. If being president is in Joe's career plan, then he should be allowed to pursue that career plan, this shouldn't stop him. I don't care that he's had a 50 year career behind him, he's got one huge job potentially in front of him too and he should be allowed to pursue that.


While not attempting to minimize Joe's action. In my mind, and I think many people's mind, a #metoo moment is about sex, molestation, and rape. If this action by Joe becomes the next #metoo movement where people are going to be fired and promotions are going to be denied and movie stars are going to lose parts in movies and I'm going to have to be as mad at Joe Biden as I am at Harvey Weinstein then I'm getting off the train.


I think I've said all my thoughts on this. I'm just repeating myself.

In closing, if Joe is the candidate in November 2020, I'm voting for the guy even knowing what I know as of today.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  4  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 01:56 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

Have you all noticed none of this stuff was shouted from the housetops until it became apparent that Joe was running for president? Republican damage control through their smear campaigns.


I don't think this is a republican smear campaign.
revelette1
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 03:38 pm
@maporsche,
Me either, I think its from the leftist wing of the progressive party. The scorched earth ones.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 03:39 pm
@engineer,
No one said they had to keep quiet, I just object to it being disqualifying because I don't think he meant any of it sexually.
Lash
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 03:59 pm
@revelette1,
Think about exactly what he did, and tell me how he DID mean it.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 04:05 pm
Yeah we scorched earth for Roosevelt types don't understand the part of grabbing of a girl by the thigh when she is in the process of explaining her experience, re getting sexually assaulted.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 04:11 pm
@Lash,
He was probably patting her in sympathy. Wrong in this day and age, but, he probably felt fatherly towards her.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 04:18 pm
No More Neoliberals Bunny 🌹🐰
@tobosbunny
·
5m
Remember when Romney had "binders full of women" and people were outraged? It seems so quaint when you look back and realize people in this country are now okay with pussy grabbers, hair sniffers and touching without permission on both sides of the aisle.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Thu 4 Apr, 2019 06:38 pm
@neptuneblue,
How old are you? Maybe you need to read up on Biden career. He has been in politics since 1973 and has a very good reputation. He hasent grabbed a woman by the p****y, not, once.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Case For Biden
  3. » Page 39
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/11/2025 at 11:42:59