@engineer,
engineer wrote:
The "pro-woman" person who takes significant liberties with women in private is almost cliche at this point as are the "many women" who jump to his defense.
I don't think anyone has accused Joe of anything inappropriate in private. Which leads credence to his claim of (paraphrasing) "I didn't know this was inappropriate." - the fact that he does it to men, women, and in public, and it apparently has no sexual connotation or harassment (according to the accusers themselves).
Quote:
When obnoxious people say "me too" is just a political attack line, something you use to bash other people but something that you don't hold your people to, this makes that case.
I disagree. I don't think this is a #metoo moment on the scale of the sexual assaults and rape that started the #metoo movement.
At some point the #metoo movement can possibly go too far, would you agree? I'll tell you something else to show you that it's not a partisan opinion...I said at the time, and still agree, that I don't think that without proof, Kavanaugh should have been disqualified from being on the SCOTUS -- I believe Dr. Ford. I don't believe Kavanaugh, but without proof in a he said/she said situation, I think he should be allowed to serve.
I think we've reached the station where I'm ready to get off the #metoo train. I'll support #metoo up until this station but when we get to the point of ruining peoples careers because they gave too long of a hug and rubbed someone shoulders in public. Well, this left leaning person has to question if it's gone too far.
I wonder where everyone else's point is?